@galleddrim@DAckert40535@Suzierizzo1 Literally nothing about his comment indicates he would “show” anything. He simply pointed out the obvious - young children are naturally curious and do not fully grasp the concept of privacy. You know better, but they may not.
@Julealice22@galleddrim@Suzierizzo1 Agreed. It has nothing to do with a grown man knowing not to look. Young children are naturally curious beings who wouldn’t fully understand. Also, I imagine that would be a jarring (or at least uncomfortable) experience for young girls their age.
For context, I work in data analytics. So naturally, I was intrigued and wanted to gain new insight into the methodologies used for this analysis. Sadly, I am still none the wiser.
You make many great points though. (1) Suggesting that journalist tell readers when sources have commercial incentives that align with their “findings.” (2) By inverting the narrative, it then becomes unfalsifiable, (3) Astro-PR will definitely be the new-new grift, which only serves to muddy the water up more.
@convergencelens This was a great read! Well done. Interestingly, I found your post/article after searching for some background on Gudea upon seeing this article. They provided NBC an "exclusive analysis" related to the Blake Lively drama. https://t.co/uQSmGwDiV8
@Ohseejay@RealEmirHan Projection, much? Andy Cohen (the host) probably asked her “who was the best kisser?” out of all the actors she’s played with. She answered. Nothing about this clip signals that she is “deeply unhappy”. 😂
@Cryptocrat888@RealEmirHan He also starred in Basketball Diaries - which he did a phenomenal job. The movie sticks with me to this day. Between that and WEGG, two pretty powerful roles before Titanic. I also loved him on Romeo and Juliet (but prob a minority on that one).
@EthicsFairy@TheOliverStone@CopyrightOffice@yizhoutweets This is quickly becoming my Roman Empire. 😫 The more I learn about her, the more fascinated I become. I’m genuinely curious as to her background/family, how she obtains all of these A-list connections, and what ultimately led to this repeated bizarre behavior on display?
@ImBreckWorsham@davidalandesign The "alternatives" likely suggest any other person to reach out to on her background at Mara Lago (besides the owner, Trump)
@ImBreckWorsham@davidalandesign I implore everyone to search jmail for additional context. I searched "William Riley" and easily found an email that came before this on Aug 2, 2011. The exchange was re: proving VG's age while she worked at mara lago (i.e., why he is calling Trump):
https://t.co/ud4cbBRAe1
@donkeykiller28 @Biohazardhunt@PokemonRestocks I feel like there must be a trick we don't know about, lol. I reloaded the pages right at the drop time and completely struck out. The last few times it has been like this. 😭
@Biohazardhunt@PokemonRestocks Sameeee.
I don’t understand! Just saw someone else comment that they got in way late and still picked up a tin. Are there secret tricks that I’m unaware of? 😭
@InJDWeStan@innercitypress That is why they switched up the adverse action until the night of the premiere (“not wanting to take pictures with him”). 😂 They realized that the list of demands timing did NOT go with the timeline (and proximity) of the alleged retaliation
@Lawyeredup1@innercitypress Yup. And if we are getting very technical, I’m unsure of any “requests” (demands) that were not eventually granted. The 98% was before the PGA letter request I believe.
@hi_gaggy@skhskh1996x@innercitypress Details matter. She effectively coerced WF to accept her increasing demands and expanded control. Otherwise she’d threaten “BL & cast won’t attend promo”. She strategically didn’t sign her contract for more leverage. WF basically had their hands tied at this late in the game.
@cruelechoes@innercitypress Agreed. Also, how convenient to change the protected action to the Premiere date (“not wanting to take pictures”) to narrow the proximity to retaliation. 😌
@hi_gaggy@MaryLou1515@innercitypress Using the language of the statue does not mean it applies or is supported. EEOC states “Retaliation includes any employer action that is ‘materially adverse’. A petty slight, minor annoyance, trivial punishment is not likely materially adverse.”