living itself is fraught with risks. Human to human interaction thus precedes interpersonal debt (allowing myself the logical jumps) folks who do not get along personally avoid working together professionally for eg. Solving for these without forgetting org goals is a hard avoid
besides, the adaptability tendency of humans to emergent problems is the precursor to creating procedural debt. Every time systemic or procedural gap is solved by humans who emergently adapt to it, instead of making system technically robust - you are signing up for new problems
You’d want to avoid adding humans to the system and spend tim scrutinising the systemic for technical gaps or errors that are non-dynamic (consistent in value/magnitude and unit), automate them
@neu_rot_ic if i stop wondering whether “they are in love with me?” or “am I in love?”, do i like delete all heterosexual, monogamy induced problems for myself? share ur experience pls
human life itself is fraught with risks. Human to human interaction is precedent to interpersonal debt (folks not getting along personally avoiding working together professionally. Creating another problem for the team to solve without loosing sight of organisation goals)