On this point, I think Adorno and others were profoundly successful such that we understand the implicit connection between Nazism and modernity. However, this means the exigency of that debate has been lost a little bit to time, and makes some of its interventions look abstract.
Good article. I think one thing that gets slightly lost in the shuffle is the intellectual context of those like Adorno in those post war years when they make an analogy between the camps and the atomic bombs, agriculture etc. For Adorno, invariably when he notes this...
What fires burned at Auschwitz? On the place of the Holocaust in uneven and combined development. Something that Ive been wrestling with for some time, distilled into the latest chartbook newsletter.
https://t.co/Qmf93PebZ1
he's arguing against those who would disconnect the Holocaust from modernity (this is explicit in the history and freedom lecture, for instance) and also those who would throw up their hands and state the issue was not worth discussing (as he notes in the metaphysics lecture)
In Alienocene, I wrote on Anne Alombert's Digital Schizophrenia (K. Verlag, Pensées soignées, 2025), expertly translated by @DJRoss70. Alombert's text is a rejoinder to a contemporary problem: thinking the deleterious effects of AI without mystification
https://t.co/G8j0Tq2gYO
@valueformhater One of butlers longest engagements with adorno comes in the relatively recent "Notes on a Performative Theory of Assembly." Pretty interesting (and critical!) contemplation of "No right life in the false one." prolly already aware of this tho I bet
I’ve come to the conclusion that “retro” by our old definition doesn’t work anymore, because the capabilities of the PS3 tech from 18 years ago really aren’t THAT different from now. Compare to 18 years before PS3 and you get the NES which is practically prehistoric in fidelity
BvB transfer cycle:
1. clear link to a target
2. Oops too expensive
3. deploy links to 6 exciting targets to mask the shame of losing out again
4. sign a guy from wolfsburg