@0708America Seriously, I am not sure how you are operating the internet if you could not read the first page on Google about this guy to directly answer your question.
@vlogging_sam@seanapriori the point is that this is very bizzare in the context of u.s. politics. we have a long tradition of not venerating living (let alone sitting) presidents, which dates back to george washington and his/the founders' desire to ensure the presidency is not like monarchy
JD Vance must have slept through his Constitutional law class at Yale. Just to remind, see Chief Justice John Marshall in Marbury v. Madison (1803): "It is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is."
@DTM254ME @DeShakeitWatson @DavidAmelottiTV@KMOV what truth... you just created your own shitty version of a proverb
"idiots are those that are blind to the truth" 💀
the fact that you think you are intelligent is proof of the dunning-kruger effect
@camels101@JosieGrillasSTL@punk again, take issue with the mural all you want, but you are misrepresenting 18 USC § 2339A to everyone on here, either because you want to scare people or because you don't understand the law, and I think that is unethical and disingenuous
@camels101@JosieGrillasSTL@punk you are either saying that this money going to a St. Louis-based artist will not be used to repair their mural and instead will be funneled to Hamas to carry out an attack
or you are (seemingly willfully) misrepresenting the law to suppress free speech, which is very unethical