I said it in the space yesterday, but I’d rather have an 80% ally than a 20% enemy.
At this point, you’re either gonna be 80% allies with me, or you’re my enemy.
Enough is enough. We are at war with demons.
We have bigger fish to fry.
Swallow your pride, grow up, & do better.
There’s a tv show called traitors.
The premise is simple- 3 people are tasked with sabotaging the game as traitors and blending in with the rest of the players who are called faithfuls.
Each night, the entire house meets and attempts to vote out who they believe is a traitor.
Sometimes, however, the group will instead turn their attention to whom they feel are “bad faithfuls”- people who either can’t be trusted or whose actions are seen as a deterrent to finding out who the actual traitors are.
This X space yesterday (from the 4 hr 30min mark to about 5:15) is a real life Traitors episode, and I’m sorry but @BlakeBednarz you are a bad faithful.
Yes, you have good takes. You have a good eye for catching things. You may very well be just another one of the good guys trying to figure out what happened to our guy Charlie. But you’re also the rudest, most condescending person in this entire community by far.
I let it slide when I heard your condescending tone towards @KeliRabon on a live, or when folks said you were lying about paying someone for the UVU footage. I had a complete change of heart after seeing you on @DDGotAPodcast and defended yourself quite well. I even went on with @Jtheyapper1 and apologized to you for my previous public opinions, without ever having spoken to you and knowing you’d never even see it.
But now you’re calling GOOD FAITHFULS like @DiligentDenizen@ArtifexMemor and @billiewebbb out of their name and somehow you don’t get why they are upset?
You even had people like @lunaechantel DEFENDING YOU, trying to explain to you why folks are upset- ITS YOUR ATTITUDE BRUH. And when you alienate your peers, it’s only a reflection of YOUR character, which is why people question your motives.
You talk about diligent not “batting 1000”- bruh you had the biggest fumble in truth community history! You had a FACETIME with THE QUEEN BEE @RealCandaceO and yet your horrible attitude and demeanor couldn’t even parlay that moment into a bigger opportunity. The arrogance you carry with THAT on your resume is astounding.
Take your own advice, “keep it 100” and change your approach, otherwise the rest of us faithfuls need to vote him out of the house so we can get back finding the real traitors.
https://t.co/IOerMMcUOm
100% BRING IT ON if I'm defense. Even if he WAS there at that time with that gun, the state's lack of definitive connection demonstrating such means they likely can't actually prove it beyond reasonable doubt. Time will tell
🚨 HERE’S WHY I’D WANT THIS TO GO TO TRIAL IF I WERE TYLER ROBINSON’S DEFENSE.
Forget the cover up theories for a second.
Forget what influencers said.
Forget what ppl THINK happened.
If Im sitting at the defense table, I want the prosecution to do one thing:
Connect Tyler Robinson, at THAT exact time, to THAT rifle, on THAT rooftop.
Not “consistent with.”
Not “looks like.”
Not “we believe.”
PROVE IT.
Because right now, alot of the evidence sounds powerful when you pile it together.
DNA.
Messages.
Clothing.
A rifle.
Blurry surveillance footage.
Witness testimony.
But a trial doesnt let you throw everything into one bucket and call it proof.
Every link has to connect.
And this is where I think most spectators miss the strategy. 👀
The prosecution has had Robinson physically in custody since he surrendered.
Yet we still havent seen some crystal clear facial comparison connecting the man in custody to the rooftop figure.
We saw footage from the sheriff’s office, sure.
But where is the clean, unmistakable face shot everyone can compare side by side?
Especially when the rooftop footage we were told was supposedly some 4K masterpiece turned out looking like it was recorded on a damn gas station camera from 2007. 😂
That doesnt prove anything shady happened.
It DOES give the defense something to attack.
Now I start asking questions.
Where is the uninterrupted video putting Tyler on that roof?
Where is the clear facial ID?
Where is the forensic evidence from the rooftop itself that specifically identifies Tyler?
Where is the evidence showing he possessed that rifle AT THE EXACT TIME of the shooting?
DNA on a weapon proves contact.
It doesnt automatically prove when the contact happened.
And it damn sure doesnt magically timestamp when somebody pulled the trigger.
This is exactly why, if Im the defense, Im not terrified of trial.
I WANT trial.
A plea turns ambiguity into certainty.
A trial turns ambiguity into a weapon.
Now I get every timestamp.
Every camera.
Every original video file.
Every cellphone record.
Every vehicle movement.
Every witness.
Every piece of forensic evidence.
Then I build one giant timeline and force the prosecution to connect ALL of it without skipping over the uncomfortable gaps.
And heres the sneaky part.
The defense doesnt have to prove who killed Charlie Kirk.
They dont have to give the jury some Hollywood alternate shooter theory.
They dont even have to make Tyler look innocent.
They need reasonable doubt.
One juror saying:
“Hold up... do we KNOW thats Tyler on that roof?”
Thats enough to create a serious problem.
The defense doesnt have to explain the gaps.
The prosecution has to close them.
And if Im Tyler Robinson’s lawyer and I think even ONE of those gaps gets bigger under cross examination...
Hell yeah Im taking this thing to trial. 👀
My name is Mr. Wayne. RedLines Out.
#CharlieKirk
@capn128183@Rach4Patriarchy or you believe hearsay before verification. no flock camera has id'd Tyler's car. none of the footage readily identify him, only testimony that it "looks like him" based on the clothes he was wearing. his dna on the gun is a POSSIBLE contributor. still no proof his gun was fired
@ACMeyor@Joshua_the_car Immediately after the judge ruled to go to trial. Literally the next thing he asked was if the defense wanted to enter a plea. They stood and immediately said yes, not guilty.
@Rach4Patriarchy Innocent people turn themselves in all the time if they are confident in clearing their name or they are in fear for their life. This isn’t evidence of a crime at all
@4freedom1USA@Rach4Patriarchy That’s not true. He was “recognized” by people from the news. And was tipped by the deputy Mike Mitchell who convinced him (could easily be seen as coerced) to turn himself in
One thing BOTH sides can agree on, Charlie Kirk was NOT a hateful person.
Those of us who love Charlie and think TR is innocent would reject that idea.
Those who love Charlie’s and think TR is guilty would also reject that idea.
There was absolutely no reason for the defense to say this- they alienated themselves big time there.
Prosecutor Ryan McBride just lied in court a few minutes ago today when he said Robinson had a rifle shoved down his pants when he entered the tunnel. In the surveillance video, both knees of the suspect can be clearly seen, fully bending while walking down the stairs.
This is true ✅ the State did not show a gun, it being used to assemble the rifle, or Tyler Robinson on the roof. And the State wants you to speculate that a kid with terrible aim, shot a rifle that wont shoot straight perfectly even though your eyes cant see that.