How to get sexually deprived desert dwellers to give up everything and fight for you? Promise them a brothel-like heaven. Take a look at this::
Men are rewarded with virgins:
"[For the Companions of the Right Hand] We have created (their Companions) of special creation. And made them virgin - pure."
Qur'an 56:35-36
These virgin Hoors will have firm breasts:
" Verily for the Righteous there will be a fulfilment of (the heart's) desires; Gardens enclosed, and grapevines; And fully-breasted women of equal age;"
Qur'an 78:31-33
"The Messenger of Allah (pbuh) said: 'Every man who enters Paradise will have two wives from among the hoor al-ayn, the like of whose beauty has never been seen by any eye, nor heard by any ear, nor conceived by any heart.'"
Sahih Muslim 2834 (Graded: Sahih)
Hadith suggests as much as 72 virgins each:
"The least of the people of Paradise in rank is the one who will have eighty thousand servants and seventy-two wives, and a dome will be raised over him of pearls, chrysolite, and rubies, the distance of which is like that between Al-Jabiyah and Sana’a."
Jami‘ at-Tirmidhi 2562 (Book 41, Hadith 24, Graded: Hasan)
Men will be given the sexual strength of 100 persons
The Prophet said: 'The believer will be given such and such strength in Paradise for sexual intercourse. It was questioned: O prophet of Allah! can he do that? He said: "He will be given the strength of one hundred persons.
Mishkat al-Masabih, Book 4, Ch. 42, No. 24 (Graded: Da'if)
A man's penis will remain 'ever-erect':
Abu Umama narrated: "The Messenger of God said, 'Everyone that God admits into paradise will be married to 72 wives; two of them are houris and seventy of his inheritance of the [female] dwellers of hell. All of them will have libidinous sex organs and he will have an ever-erect penis.' "
Sunan Ibn Maja, Zuhd (Book of Abstinence, 39, Graded: Da'if).
Muslims will point out that the last two are graded weak narrations. However, weak does not mean wrong otherwise they would have been removed. And in the mind of a terrorist or Jihadi fighter, that *technically issue* does not matter. It is an option of between 2 and 72, and that is good enough!
What do good Moslima women get? I tell you. Women don't get 72 virgin men or a choice of men! Women receive paradise’s blessings and what they desire- brilliant, but nothing stated specifically for them.
Does the Quran call for coexistence and living in peace with others?
Let's see:
O believers! Take neither Jews nor Christians as guardians—they are guardians of each other. Whoever does so will be counted as one of them. Surely Allah does not guide the wrongdoing people.
Quran 5:51
Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.
Quran 9:29
Those believers who sit back are not equal to those who perform Jihad in the Path of Allah with their wealth and their selves. Allah has favored those who perform Jihad with their wealth and their selves by degrees over those who sit back...."
Quran 4:95
But when the forbidden months are past, then fight and slay the Pagans wherever you find them, an seize them, beleaguer them, and lie in wait for them in every stratagem (of war); but if they repent, and establish regular prayers and practise regular charity, then open the way for them: for Allah is Oft-forgiving, Most Merciful.
Quran 9:5
Indeed, they who disbelieved among the People of the Scripture and the polytheists will be in the fire of Hell, abiding eternally therein. Those are the worst of creatures.
Quran 98:6
And the few verses that talk about "You have your religion and I have mine" Quran 109 are Meccan verse that was later cancelled by the process of abrogation
(النسخ)
as "No forcing in religion" in Quran 2 was in reference to attempts to get Jews to convert when Muhammad saw them as Dhimmis. A financial source. So he asked people not to force them. This did not apply to polytheists and atheists. Read the Tafsir in both cases and see for yourself.
You can read more about it here:
https://t.co/HUlQVN4HMt
Anyone who says that Islam respects free speech or freedom of religion does not even understand the basic history of Islam or Islamic teachings. Starting with Muhammad, he did not tolerate critics or people who used poetry or politics to challenge him. From Abu Lahab who ended up being cursed in the Quran and killed after the fall of Mecca, to Umm Qirfa who was an old lady and the leader of an opposing tribe who got killed by having two camels run in opposite directions till she got split in two for writing poetry critical of him, Nadhir Ibn Harith who challenged Muhammad on the science of the Quran and asked challenging questions and got his head chopped.
So, what happened to Salman Rushdie should not surprise us. If Salman had lived in Muhammad's days, he would not have survived this long. But we should never take this incident lightly. We should all condemn it and expose Islam's and Muhammad's violence towards its critics as nothing less than cowardness from having anyone challenge their teaching. How can you, with all honesty, claim you have a religion that is the undisputed truth yet anyone who dares to challenge this truth should be eliminated?? How can you honestly say it is free choice to accept Islam when those who leave it becomes liable for execution for simply leaving or expressing why they left? Stop kidding yourself. If this was another religion, you would be the first to point out that this is ridiculous and sounds more like a cult. Without threats, without violence, without forced slavery, Islam would have never expanded. Fact: Truth does not mind being questioned, a lie does not like being challenged.
What is Salman Rushdie accused of? In Satanic Verses was the first blockbuster book to expose a well Hidden secret in the Quran when Muhammad received revelation from Satan and included them in the Quran! Research it. It is all over Islamic sources. He is targeted because he exposes it as evidence of Islam being made up! That is the issue. They may label it as Islamophobic, or hate....even when it is coming from their Islamic sources!
This verse is meant to install fear in believers to say "Look, if Allah sent down the Quran on a solid mountain, it will crumble in fear and terror. So should YOU!"
But we have a big problem here. In Islam we mock the idea that objects and statues can think, talk, or feel! This is supposedly a pagan way of viewing the world! What the hell is this statement doing in the Quran?
And if "sending the Quran" would make mountains crumble, why can a human mock it, burn it, put ham on it, and even kick it... Yet the land under him did not crumble in fear. Take a moment and think, if this was all lies... wouldn't this be the proof that it is a lie?
A well known Hadith narrated by Ibn 'Umar and Abu Huraira recounts the story of a woman who was punished in the Hereafter for mistreating a cat. She confined the cat, neither providing it with food or water nor allowing it to roam free to eat, leading to the cat's death from starvation. As a result, she will be sent to Hellfire for her cruelty. This Hadith, found in Sahih al-Bukhari (3318) and Sahih Muslim (2242). This Hadith supposedly shows Islam’s emphasis on compassion toward animals. It supposedly teaches that mistreating or neglecting animals, even small creatures like cats, is a sin with severe consequences.
But also in the authentic Hadiths killing of dogs and lizards!!
The hadiths mention killing dogs, associating them with impurity or evil. In Sahih Muslim (Book 10, Hadith 3813), the Prophet Muhammad reportedly ordered the killing of dogs, particularly black ones, due to their association with the devil. Another narration in Sahih al-Bukhari (Book 54, Hadith 424) suggests dogs, especially black ones, are linked to Satan, prompting orders to kill them. However, other hadiths provide exceptions, such as allowing dogs for hunting, guarding, or farming (Sahih Muslim, Book 10, Hadith 3814).
Also hadiths associate lizards with evil and recommend their killing. In Sahih al-Bukhari (Book 54, Hadith 525) and Sahih Muslim (Book 26, Hadith 5562), the Prophet Muhammad reportedly described a type of lizard (often translated as "gecko" or "wazagh") as a "harmful creature" and encouraged killing it. One narration (Sahih Muslim, Book 26, Hadith 5563) states that killing a lizard with one strike earns more reward than with multiple strikes, suggesting a religious merit. Some hadiths link lizards to mischief or harm, with a specific reference in Sunan Abu Dawud (Book 41, Hadith 5249) to a lizard being among creatures that "blow on the fire" during the time of Prophet Ibrahim, implying a connection to evil or betrayal.
But really, aren't dogs best man's friend and the colour of the dog has absolutely nothing to do with it being good or evil. And lizards benefit ecosystems in multiple ways. They control insect populations, including pests like flies and mosquitoes, reducing the need for chemical pesticides. Some species, like geckos, eat harmful agricultural pests, supporting crop health. Lizards also serve as prey for larger animals, maintaining food chain balance. Certain lizards, such as those that consume fruit or nectar, aid in seed dispersal and pollination, promoting plant growth. Their burrowing habits helps soil, enhancing nutrient cycling. By maintaining ecological balance, lizards contribute to biodiversity and support healthy, resilient ecosystems.
But don't expect a superstitious uneducated uncivilised desert dweller to know this!!
I grew up believing Shariah would bring a perfect society. But as I matured, I realised it’s a 7th-century legal system rooted in a very different world. For all its lofty ideals, it is ultimately enforced by humans—flawed, biased, and fallible. In modern justice systems, wrongful convictions can be reversed. But how do you undo a hand amputation? An execution? A stoning? You can’t. There’s no compensation for irreversible punishment.
Shariah law also struggles with modern values like gender equality and freedom of expression. In many interpretations, a woman’s testimony is worth half a man’s. Apostasy and blasphemy are treated as capital crimes. How can that exist in a time where human rights and individual freedoms are universal principles?
Another problem is practicality. Even countries that call themselves "Islamic" don’t implement Shariah fully. Why? Because it doesn’t function in a complex, modern society with diverse populations, global economies, and international laws. If it worked, you’d expect the most peaceful, progressive, and just societies to be those who apply it fully. But that’s clearly not the case.
One of the things that disturbs me most is the insistence on same-day burial. Sure, it made sense in the desert 1,400 years ago without refrigeration. But today, rushing burials can destroy crucial forensic evidence. Anyone familiar with criminology knows how many murders could go undetected because the body is gone before anyone can ask questions.
Islam is a product of its time. I understand why some seek it for spiritual aspects due to existential concerns, but its legal system is not fit for the 21st century. But here is the problem, Quran makes it clear you cannot separate those two!
The term Sheikh, Dawah, Imams, and Islamic scholars are not terms Muhammad or the Quran suggested. Muhammad was very clear to.distance Islam from the role of priests and missionaries that he saw as corrupted individuals making money from the poor, selling them lies and motivated by money.
In addition, Muhammad also saw these roles as redundant when the "End of time" is so near and he is here to see us through it. See my other post on "end of time" that shows Muhammad insisted it was "very close" some 1400 years ago.
For Muhammad, the Quran was clear and easy to read, new nations have to learn Arabic, and by the time he finishes conquest of the world, the world will end -thus who needs a sheikh, dawah, or Islamic tafseers. Shows short term thinking by Muhammad and a god having no idea to language barriers, learning barriers (not everyone has same level of IQ), and a timeline set around the likes of Alexander the Great who was able to conquer the known world in a quarter of his life!
Now a days those Islamic sheikhs, Dawah, Imams, and scholars are middle men making tons of money offline and online (social) media. Do they know that Muhammad forbids them? When Dr Joker Zakri was exposed to having was seems to be million of dollars in flats put in his immediate family names, one had to ask: "Where did you get that money from?" But my brainwashed brothers and sisters did not care and did not want to know? Seriously, on one social media page supposedly moderate, I posted the question with the Interpol warrant for his arrest link, I got attacked and before I knew it...blocked!
If they look at the roles of missionaries and priesthood in Islam, they will know Muhammad spoke against it and while the new terms were invented to distance themselves from the Christian and Judaism terms but in reality they are the same roles!! We are masters of "reinventing" solutions to fix Islam. For example, we know interest on loans is "haram" but we invented hundreds of terms for it...and did brain gymnastics to justify it and you will be pressed to find one single Islamic country that does not have it...even Islamic banks have interests charged in one way or another. It is a joke!
Reason 64 for leaving Islam:
You can read it easier here: https://t.co/8mWNyPBVL5
The Quran describes paradise (Jannah) with imagery of comfort, including shades and reclining chairs or couches, in several verses.
Quran 4:57 :
"…We will admit them to gardens beneath which rivers flow, wherein they abide eternally… and We will admit them to [cool, refreshing] shade."
This verse highlights "shade" as a symbol of comfort and protection in paradise.
Quran 56:30-32, "extended shade, water flowing constantly, and abundant fruits" in paradise, complementing the imagery of comfort and reclining places.
Quran 13:35:
"The example of paradise, which the righteous have been promised, is [that] beneath it rivers flow. Its fruit is lasting, and its shade…"
Here, shade is described as enduring, emphasising the eternal tranquillity of Jannah.
Quran 36:56 :
"They and their spouses – in shade, reclining on adorned couches."
This verse explicitly links shade with reclining on couches, portraying a scene of restful luxury.
Quran 76:13 "Reclining therein upon couches, they will find there neither [the heat of] a sun nor bitter cold."
These verses collectively paint a picture of paradise as a place of eternal comfort, with reclining couches and shaded, serene environments, rewarding the believers. Of course, there are many issues to raise here. First, why shade from the Sun? Was there still supposed to be a strong and powerful Sun in Paradise? Didn’t the Quran in 81:1-2 and 75:8-9 say that when the end of time comes, Allah will be folding the Sun and the Moon away! And even if you argue that maybe Allah will recreate the Sun in heaven for light, why does it need to be hot that you need to shade away from it? Out of five verses, four emphasise ‘shade’ as being a key feature of Paradise. What are humans shielding from? Getting Sunburn? Getting skin cancer? We again go back to how the description fits a 6th-century desert dweller who seems to project heaven, which helps them escape their everyday challenges, that is heat and direct Sun impact on their biological body. A body that has a heat tolerance system that finds excessive heat exhausting and harsh. In the afterlife, we would have shed our biological bodies and existed as souls. An all-knowing God would have explained that in the afterlife, souls will not be affected by the sensations of hot or cold. It would enjoy the Sun without feeling the sensation of overheating or exhaustion. Are you starting to build a picture here? Wait until you read the next one!
The claim that Muhammad split the moon, as mentioned in Quran 54:1-2 and various hadiths, is often touted as a divine miracle by some Muslims. They point to supposed "evidence" like NASA images of lunar cracks to back it up. But let’s cut through the lies: this miracle is a myth, and those images are just natural lunar features—nothing more.
First, the story. Quran 54:1-2 vaguely states, “The Hour has come near, and the moon has split.” Hadiths, like Sahih al-Bukhari (Vol. 5, Book 58, No. 208), claiming Muhammad showed Meccans the moon split in two, with halves on either side of a mountain. Sounds epic, right? But where’s the evidence? If the moon literally split, it would’ve been a global spectacle. Ancient civilizations—Persians, Greeks, Chinese—were obsessed with the night sky. They recorded comets (e.g., 467 AD) and eclipses (e.g., 546 AD) across continents. Yet, not a single non-Muslim source mentions a moon-splitting event in Muhammad’s time (circa 622-632 CE). Why? Because it likely never happened!
Now, about those “cracks” images. Some Muslims share NASA photos, like those of Rima Ariadaeus, claiming they prove the moon was split. These aren’t cracks from a miraculous split; they’re lunar rilles—long, deep trenches formed by geological processes like volcanic activity or tectonic stress. NASA’s 2009 Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter data shows the moon’s surface is full of such features, with rilles stretching hundreds of kilometers but only a fraction of the moon’s circumference (e.g., Rima Ariadaeus is ~300 km long, about 2% of the lunar circumference). NASA explicitly denies any evidence of the moon splitting into two. These trenches are also seen on Mars and Venus—did Muhammad split those too? Of course not.
Muslim apologists often dodge this with excuses: “Only true believers saw it,” or “It was cloudy elsewhere.” If this was a miracle to convince non-believers, why hide it from the world? And the Indian king Cheraman Perumal’s story? It’s a 12th-century fabrication, written centuries after Muhammad’s death, with no contemporary Indian records. Pure propaganda.
Some argue it was a lunar eclipse or an optical illusion. But eclipses were well-documented, and an illusion wouldn’t leave physical evidence. Others say it’s metaphorical or refers to the Day of Judgment, contradicting the literalist hadith narrative. The Quran itself emphasizes that Muhammad’s did not and will not make miracles (17:59), making the moon story a later addition to boost his powers.
Lets sum it up: a vague verse, dodgy hadiths, and mislabeled NASA pics don’t make a miracle. The moon’s trenches are just geology, not theology. Time to stop splitting hairs and face the facts: the moon’s still whole, and this tale’s a holey myth.
¿Justicia o advertencia? El abogado que demandó a los poderosos fabricantes de vacunas covid, fue arrestado sin cargos.
El abogado neerlandés Arno van Kessel fue detenido sin orden judicial y sin acceso pleno a su equipo legal. Ese mismo día había presentado documentos centrales en una demanda contra Bill Gates, Albert Bourla (CEO de Pfizer) y Klaus Schwab por los efectos colaterales de las políticas de vacunación covid.
Lo más grave no es solo la detención. Es que Van Kessel no es un simple defensor, sino parte demandante en un proceso legal en el que se investigan posibles violaciones a derechos fundamentales. La fiscalía alega “vínculos criminales”, pero no ha presentado pruebas concretas.
El juicio sigue adelante, con testigos como Mike Yeadon, ex vicepresidente de Pfizer. Pero la señal enviada al resto del equipo legal es clara. ¿Hasta dónde llega el poder de intimidar procesos incómodos?
No es necesario exagerar para ver que algo huele mal. El derecho a defensa debe ser sagrado, incluso —y sobre todo— cuando se trata de los intocables.
https://t.co/7Gw99OPEYB
https://t.co/nbgRTDKZmR
Los países con mayor tasa de desempleo en Latinoamérica: lista con cifras más recientes
Argentina
El desempleo en Argentina se disparó a 7,9% en el primer trimestre de 2025, lo que representó un incremento de 1,5 puntos porcentuales respecto al 6,4% del cuarto trimestre de 2024, según datos del Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Censos (Indec) publicados el 19 de junio.
El 7,9% de desocupación es el registro más elevado en lo que va del Gobierno de Javier Milei. En el primer trimestre del 2024 se había ubicado en 7,7%, en el segundo en 7,6% y en el tercero en 6,9%.
Respecto a Argentina, la experta Pardo dice que la informalidad laboral, con una tasa del 42,7%, está conectada con la “difícil planificación empresarial formal” debido a la “inestabilidad macroeconómica del país”, si bien reconoce avances en programas de fuente de empleo enfocados a los jóvenes. https://t.co/fVArwzKGsW
Un tercio de los pacientes con miocarditis tras vacuna COVID-19 presenta cicatrices cardíacas persistentes más de 18 meses después, según un estudio reciente. ¿Leve y pasajero? La ciencia dice otra cosa.
Durante años se ha dicho que la miocarditis postvacunal es “leve” y “remite rápido”. Así lo dicen los verificador es de la Verdad "Fact Checkers" y algunas autoridades sanitarias.
Miocarditis postvacunal con fibrosis cardíaca no es "leve".
Los pacientes tienen derecho a un seguimiento adecuado.
La ciencia debe prevalecer sobre la propaganda.
Un nuevo estudio en Open Heart revela que la miocarditis asociada a la vacuna COVID-19 deja cicatrices cardíacas persistentes en muchos pacientes, incluso más de 18 meses después del diagnóstico inicial.
👇
https://t.co/dfrnlDi0rb
@NuncaUnGonzalez 🚨LA MASONERIA ES CRACION 🕎✡ ERGO🇮🇱.
OSEA ARGENTINA NO, CATOLICISMO NO.
AAHHHHH PERO 👿👹🇮🇱 SATANISMO SI ‼️🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬