@joshlewis You touched on something that I keep meaning to learn more about.
How does libel work on the internet vs in print or interviews?
There seems to be less prosecution around online posts (I think? Should confirm this). Wonder if the legal footing for online is different?
@joshlewis Yeah, there are a lot of good reasons for anonymity. No doubt.
I could probably get my folks to ignore accounts if they were explicitly labeled βanonymous userβ.
Itβs the ones named βBob Johnsonβ with a stock photo of a guy grilling that gets them.
@joshlewis I want to concur with that last statement but I also fear stress testing it given the crumbling political norms & tribalism we have seen over the past 10β12 years.
Imagine the consequences of a former general and chief of staff calling a candidate a fascist in any prior cycle.
@joshlewis Yeah. I see the wisdom in what you are saying.
I wonder if the move is to push the tech companies to block known bad actors, and be held accountable if they donβt. Not blocking the individual posts/statements but using algorithms to find the bot accounts more aggressively.
@joshlewis But we know they are very different in nature.
More generally, the anonymity afforded online precludes the functioning of normal reputation dynamics and that is sometimes abused in a way that my folks donβt appreciate.
@joshlewis Good question. Been thinking about this since I read your post.
I think it comes down to my parents. They lack the media/tech literacy that I feel our generation has. They ascribe similar credibility to things on Facebook as to what they see on the news.
@joshlewis There are functioning democracies that look like the former (France as example), I know of no functioning democracy that looks like the latter.