@dieworkwear But I think an issue this framework (one which I really like!) fails to address is that not all areas have such well developed languages, or as a friend called it, "legible." So creating styles is hard because the language isn't there, or others (even in subgroup) may not get it
@mattpocockuk I'm a big fan for types we control, one downside when dealing with outside APIs is it means that even backwards compatible changes will break your schema A tradeoff to be sure
@snikolov Then treat personal biological phenomenon as a source of entropy. The tuning out is trying not to do more or less of the thing once you're paying attention. Tuning in is still being aware of it
@snikolov Like you tap every time a bird lands or something. I think there's a hidden constraint that the random tapping has to be fast, but if you go off a low entropy source, you can probably do it. Which I think is interesting in its own way
But for oneself? Maybe you meditate+
@JackMcCloy For the exact reason you're asking this these days I try to use it only in the sense of "this has to do with things that only matter for large companies." So not a value judgement, more descriptive of a type of feature set
@BretDevereaux Replies actually used to work like this, leading to the practice of ".@" in the case where someone wanted to send it to their followers. Twitter thought it was too complicated for users to understand the rules around who saw what. I agree that it'd be nice to have!
We're watching a stunning takeover of America's political and civic life. It's happening because right-wing activists play for keeps, left-wing activists play for likes, and Democrats play by the rules.
@mellifera_x3@YumeTsuretekita AFAIK you can't get it online in Japan. You have to go to a true pharmacy. I've been to lazy to go in but we've asked at a Dr's office and that's what they said. Guess it's more controlled than elsewhere...