@allenholub Someone needs to understand the value, make decisions with the team. Collaboration requires an understanding of value, and hopefully a shared understanding. But if no one can assess the value of the output of the team, then things go sideways. Who pays?
This thread is interesting because it pits "design" agains "product management" as if they are waring camps. How about integrating design, product, and dev instead? Competing silos are never a good thing, IME. Break down the walls.
@ProjectLincoln I left after 9/11 and the rush to invade Iraq. I felt (and was) deceived by people with power for their own agenda. Started voting independently in 2004, mostly for Democrats with Obama in 2008.
Precedent is a poor reason for decisions. It calcifies the status quo without a compelling rationale.
It doesn’t matter how long a tradition has stood. If the old way is wrong, it should be challenged and changed.
Progress lies in improving the future, not defending the past.
Took the debate stage last night to hold Greg Abbott accountable for his extremism and eight years of failing the people of Texas.
Share this recap, and join us in defeating him.
Criminally indicted Ken Paxton, Texas's Attorney General, ran from a subpoena because he believes the law doesn’t apply to him.
And that’s why he has evaded trial for almost a decade.
Texans are tired of his corruption. In 41 days we will vote him out.
Of all the messages I have shared over my career, as a field reporter, from the anchor chair, and most recently through my platforms on social media and this Steady newsletter, this is among the most important. At least to me personally. https://t.co/uYlOS5nFMn
How we define success is a source of happiness we control.
105 studies, 70k ppl globally: valuing extrinsic over intrinsic goals predicts lower well-being.
Seeking fame, money, or beauty is a bottomless pit. Pursuing growth, kindness, trust, and health is a path to flourishing.
@allenholub @JulieThinx I agree. And, I don’t have a better rewording. This is more words and misses some of the sentiment: focus on improvements to the system, not attempting to measure individual’s contribution. (Yea, this isn’t better, or even good.)
@allenholub @JulieThinx I don’t disagree with what I think your intent is. I just think that statements that use words like “system” and “individual” in comparison with each other is rife for misinterpretation.