jdxgfty

[jdxgfty @jdxgfty]

@eyayaw @frectonz @YafetGetch lol, Devault, out of all people, making a blog post about "weird guys". why didn't he put himself in there too?

https://t.co/xHikGCDDmo

[jdxgfty @jdxgfty]

@altulige @FADEDPHOENlX https://t.co/SrmDH3mz3I

[jdxgfty @jdxgfty]

@benno0_ @Lunascaped they're referring to theo here, because of someshit theo said about the ffmpeg admin. (i don't remember the details)

[jdxgfty @jdxgfty]

@aka_gfunk @wwxwashere

[jdxgfty @jdxgfty]

@srvtest @samhogan are you seriously saying that public keys shouldn't be public?

[jdxgfty @jdxgfty]

@nauman1225 @bunjavascript @dylanconway111 Monokai Extended
(it's the default color theme used by bat)

[jdxgfty @jdxgfty]

@theepiest @that2art @Lunascaped @Porkbun .my domains have WHOIS privacy provided by the registry. (and they're not the only registry that does this)

https://t.co/qINoLhwrUU

[jdxgfty @jdxgfty]

@yassine_safr @maria_rcks a personalized marketing email is still a marketing email.
if the recipient is in the EU, these cold emails are unlawful.
collecting and processing the email address (to send unsolicited email) also violates GDPR (it needs a lawful basis) and GitHub's ToS.

[jdxgfty @jdxgfty]

@prathamghaywat @stupidtechtakes the video is from 2018. it did work at the time (or at least for me)

[jdxgfty @jdxgfty]

@renevanpelt @maria_rcks @euler2074 1. doesn't matter
2. somebody sent an unsolicited marketing email to an address that was not shared publicly for that purpose* ftfy
3. marketing emails are not private messages.

also, harvesting email addresses from GitHub to send unsolicied emails is against their ToS.

[jdxgfty @jdxgfty]

@_rram12 @maria_rcks @euler2074 a public email address doesn't mean you're free to send or that i want receive unsolicited emails about your shitty product/project.

a screenshot from GitHub's Acceptable Use Policies, hope this helps.

[jdxgfty @jdxgfty]

@remain_urus @maria_rcks @euler2074 ye, it's spam. not only that, but B2C cold emails are illegal in the EU. (ePrivacy Directive)
also if you got the email address via GitHub contributions, that's also illegal under GDPR. (and prolly against GitHub's ToS)

[jdxgfty @jdxgfty]

@alexdolbun @IntCyberDigest @ICANN ICANN wouldn't get involved in this. they don't have the same authority over ccTLDs as they do over gTLDs.

[jdxgfty @jdxgfty]

@Fowzy__ @IntCyberDigest yes, the registry operator, the organization that adds your domain to the DNS and makes it available to the public, can, shockingly, also remove it from the DNS.
your last question is completely irrelevant to what's happening here. but to answer it, no, TLS exists.

[jdxgfty @jdxgfty]

@Will_W_Welker @grok @danialbka @IntCyberDigest https://t.co/EIW3rZcdMz

[jdxgfty @jdxgfty]

@bielarusajed @stupidtechtakes certificate authorities have nothing to do with the actual encryption in TLS

[jdxgfty @jdxgfty]

@coolkoon @StanleyMasinde_ @stupidtechtakes if this is such a wild and unheard-of concept to you, then maybe pick up a service that claims to encrypt your data client side and read their security whitepaper/architecture to see how they do it.

also, while you're at it:
https://t.co/h3AyzdjwYN

[jdxgfty @jdxgfty]

@stupidtechtakes some retards in this comment section are really struggling with reading comprehension.
"but it uses https"

[jdxgfty @jdxgfty]

@iamrollandex or just use this

https://t.co/AH4dCmR1JP

[jdxgfty @jdxgfty]

@refractiveecho @stupidtechtakes A VPN is just a glorified proxy. A site would just see a different IP address.
Wow, congrats, you changed one thing out of a dozen that can be used to fingerprint you. That's like putting a fake mustache on and thinking you changed your whole identity.