JeeeBurrr

I don't DM.

Post something. I don't promise to follow you, but if you haven't posted anything, I *will not* follow you.

[JeeeBurrr @jeeburr]

James Talawacko says he won't eat meat...

But of course, he wants to lick @KenPaxtonTX

@jamestalarico

[JeeeBurrr @jeeburr]

@aj_inapi @Serenityin24 While actually doing the fascist thing themselves? Are you of the belief these morons are believed by anyone?

[JeeeBurrr @jeeburr]

@LeaderJohnThune is wishing with all his heart that the election fraud in California weren’t so obvious.

But it is, and it’s Thune’s fault. And people can see it.

[Disgraced Propagandist @DisgracedProp]

Somebody else needs to help me do this with charts and graphs but I’ll try with words first.

- In a normal election, you have 2 candidates, R & L. People cast votes. Proportionally, the votes of each candidate rise and fall in little chunks but take an overall steady line due to the force of averages. One of the lines eventually tops out, and that candidate wins on election night.

- In a mail in election, you have 2 candidates R & L. In this instance, some mail ins (if allowed) may come in after Election Day. But still, due to the force of averages, their lines with have little ups and downs but maintain a steady upward trajectory both during and after the election until one wins.

Now it has become the norm that after the election in mail in states, Dem candidates tend to go from tied or losing to drastically ahead AFTER the election, against the force of averages. How?

There are two legal, non fraudulent explanations:

1) that “Dems vote late by mail.” Dubious, considering that it used to be that Rs were known as absentee voters, but technically possible that for some never explained reason, Ds vote later than Rs by mail and that explains the statistical anomaly of why Dems lines shoot up after Election Day.

2) ballot harvesting. The far more likely explanation. Legal in California, this is when huge amounts of ballots are collected by political activists (unions, NGOs etc) and submitted on behalf of large populations of people in churches, workplaces etc. Both sides do it, but it is technically possible that Dems are much better at it. This is how insiders explain the “red mirage” statistical anomalies in 2020 and that have become so common since. Also explains why the prediction markets clinched Raman as winning while she was still down.

However, there is something different happening in Pratt v Bass election. A third candidate, a second, much less popular and less well known Dem is in the race, Nithya Raman. And this time, the late mail in ballots—mailed on Election Day or just before which is why they are “late mail in”—didn’t go to “the dems” they went specifically to Nithya Raman. Pratt stayed flat. Bass stayed flat. Nithya went way up after the initial count was reported. Unprecedented.

Oddly, the mail in mailed any time before Election Day did not favor nithya at all. Only the late mail ins counted after initial numbers were reported massively favored her. So we’re meant to believe that Nithya voters specifically voted not just by mail by late by mail, while the other Dem and Pratt voters did not. Bass voters stopped voting late mail in entirely, as they had last election against caruso, and Nithya voters started?

Could it be “Dems vote late by mail?” No, because then both Nithya and Bass, both Dems, would have risen at roughly the same rate, only without Pratt. But nithya massively over performed just enough to oust pratt, which would not have been possible had she and bass split the votes.

Could it be ballot harvesting? Also no. You can harvest a church or workplace and predict roughly that your harvested votes will favor Dems, but how could you feasibly predict which Dem out of two? Nithya’s support, always squarely in third place during the polls, is mostly educated white women, definitely not the type to vote late or be harvested. But that’s actually besides the point. How could a vote harvester, who is supposedly delivering filled out and sealed ballots from a constituency the harvester believes will lean left, know which left wing candidate this or that batch favors? And moreover, why would they then send only those batches after the election, while submitting all the other mail in ballots for bass before the election?

Occams Razor points to the much simpler explanation. Whoever is harvesting the votes isn’t just harvesting them, they’re somehow controlling the votes themselves, whether by filling them out or throwing away competing votes they don’t like. This is the definition of voter fraud.

[JeeeBurrr @jeeburr]

@Pwnitz PatPat rides again.

Is the Vaseline working?

[JeeeBurrr @jeeburr]

@grahamformaine Maine loves them a Nazi.

[schotts - U.S. Citizen and Patriot @schotts]

@grahamformaine Old white people. Kind of like the revival of Germany after WWI

[Harold__Finch @HaroldWren22]

@MarcoFoster_ No one gives a shit what Scott Pelley has to say. Stop wasting everyone’s time with this trash. He’s unemployed. Fuck him.

[JeeeBurrr @jeeburr]

@GregorJmacs @MarcoFoster_ Butthurt is real hurt.

[JeeeBurrr @jeeburr]

@scfilipowski @MarcoFoster_ You seem bright.

[JeeeBurrr @jeeburr]

@shalin43031 @MarcoFoster_ @PatiKRoll11 Scott Pelley paid his way out of war?

[JeeeBurrr @jeeburr]

@amar_4inc @MarcoFoster_ You seem bright.

[JeeeBurrr @jeeburr]

@FozonCapital @MarcoFoster_ Who?

[JeeeBurrr @jeeburr]

Reminder: There are no elections in California.

[JeeeBurrr @jeeburr]

@LeaderJohnThune,

@theDemocrats in California owe you a big ass pile of money. They couldn’t have cheated successfully without your help.

[JeeeBurrr @jeeburr]

@HBZnYA @johnennis @DecisionDeskHQ An opportunity for our country.

[JeeeBurrr @jeeburr]

@Spidermonkey423 @johnennis @DecisionDeskHQ Strategists weren’t in on the plan.

[JeeeBurrr @jeeburr]

@PhillipODell8 @johnennis @DecisionDeskHQ You seem very sharp.

[John Ennis @johnennis]

@stevenpair @DecisionDeskHQ Who said anything about Pratt?

[John Ennis @johnennis]

@DecisionDeskHQ It makes perfect sense that the candidate whose campaign collapsed, and who got annihilated so badly on election day that she was crying on stage, would outperform the incumbent on the late arriving mail-in ballots

Totally legitimate, nothing to see here

Democracy!

[JeeeBurrr @jeeburr]

@HotMoozik @DecisionDeskHQ Well, LA’s government can.

Hope you escape the next fire.