@johncutlefish My shoot from the hip contribution is in the question: “why don’t people show more empathy for people in [situation they think is different than their own].
We are evolutionarily wired for antipathy towards the out group.
@peterme It’s an assumption that raises flags for me too. The problems with this model became more obvious when Data Science was added as the 4th, top-level discipline.
Look at this diagram on Wikipedia and imagine:
1) The numbers on the x-axis are features
2) How drastically those lines separate from each other as you go out further
https://t.co/FhK0FMqBL5
Great engineers often got to great by developing a finely tuned, technical hypervigilance.
It's not great to demand the benefits of that mindset but penalize for its drawbacks.
That misunderstanding causes lots of downstream problems, including unreasonable burden/blame on one function, disempowering other leaders, and allowing a lack of alignment across leadership to fester.
@johncutlefish Generally agree. After the industry/roles evolve that part of “product/product mgmt” is maybe just “leadership”.
Side note: the “and then you don’t” might only hold if nothing changes.
@johncutlefish That’s a subtle but important distinction. Lots of good Product Management is done by people who aren’t Product Managers. We might be better off if we pulled them apart.
@roybahat Depends on your definition of “worked”. As I spend more time at scale I’ve begun to think we don’t have helpful mental models for, “working well”, that scale up and down well. Might be related to why leaders struggle to stretch far from scale they know.