So $ZEC was able to move 10x in bear market because someone minted infinite amount then paid the biggest KOLS insane amount with rules of selling
Everyone starts to shill it price goes insane insiders keep selling and only after months of this people find the bug
Gotcha
Feminists are so insane that they'll say "women should get paid to not work for three years" instead of just admitting that the entire idea of women working out of the home was a mistake
Female solipsism doesn't have an upper bounds
If you're thinking there's a point, say 70%, 80%, 90% where they say "Okay, things have gotten too lopsided" you're mistaken
Women will secure resources for themselves at all costs until they cause the system to collapse
The only time they don't do this is when they have no say whatsoever, and wouldn't you know it that's how every successful society emerged
41 kidnappings of crypto holders in France in 3.5 months of 2026.
Why?
🥖 French tax officials selling crypto owners' data to criminals (Ghalia C.) + massive tax database leaks.
Now the state also wants IDs and private messages of social media users.
More data = More victims.
It’s important to know that a good portion of the last 200,000 BTC that @Strategy bought was sold to them by people worried about Quantum Computers that don’t exist yet.
As I explain in @TheFiatStandard, governments want you to eat garbage instead of meat to hide inflation.
Inflationist scammer Milei is the latest in a long line of fiat scammers: https://t.co/9UxWxqqE3f
"Where are the servers of Bitcoin located?” - Prof Jiang
That single question from Jiang shows the misunderstanding immediately.
Bitcoin does not run on one company’s servers,
Bitcoin runs on a distributed network of nodes spread across the world, which is exactly why it is hard to censor, shut down, or control, plus the mining system on top of it to protect it with energy.
When someone frames Bitcoin like a centralized system, they are not critiquing Bitcoin as it is.
They are critiquing a version of Bitcoin that exists only in their own confusion.
It seems Jane Street may have had a long-standing culture that essentially trained crypto scammers, and perhaps also concocted and ran some of the scams themselves.
Terra/Luna was a jenga tower waiting for somebody to topple it, and it may have been Jane Street that figured out how to do it. If crypto is not strong and secure against such things, it provides little or no benefit over traditional finance, so I'm not going to cry about this, and perhaps it should even be applauded.
The alleged Bitcoin ETF market making + "10 am" selling with that liquidity sounds like a considerably more problematic conflict of interest. "Negligent" might be a good way to describe the ETFs who naively trusted Jane Street with this function. Now the once-hot crypto ETFs are draining because of an understandable reduction in trust, not in the coins themselves, but in the way Wall Street "makes markets" for buying and selling them.
In finance "everyone is a scammer" -- and you should stop blindly trusting scammers.
That is why Bitcoin OGs have long said, "Not your keys, not your coins," "don't trust, verify", and even "trusted third parties are security holes."
And when "the market" is so dependent on trusting strangers, especially strangers who still don't actually understand or like Bitcoin all that much, it's also not your "market price."
https://t.co/KhOX16gKZ3