Jeff Clark

VP Litigation @ Oversight Project; fmr. Acting OIRA Admin (OMB) & CFPB; fmr. Double DOJ Ass't Atty Gen'l; admin law expert; on GETTR + @ RealJeffClark on Truth

[Jeff Clark @JeffClarkUS]

Please watch the new documentary about my struggle fighting against the Democrats trying to destroy me, because I am a strong Trump supporter and thought Georgia investigating its election in 2020 at a deeper level was worth doing.

[Center for Renewing America @amrenewctr]

Fearless at the Point of Attack: The Jeff Clark Story

Our new documentary exposes how the Deep State uses lawfare to target President Trump & his supporters 👇

(3:10) 2020 Election Fraud
(11:08) The SHAM January 6th Committee
(13:29) The DOJ Raids Jeff Clark’s House
(18:44) Fani Willis Makes a Mockery of the Law
(20:43) The DC Bar Seeks Disbarment
(25:53) How to Dismantle the Deep State

[Pascal-Emmanuel Gobry @pegobry_en]

When I was a child, my grandfather would sometimes solemnly intone at the dinner table: "The purpose of socialism is to organize scarcity."

As a kid it sort-of didn't register in my brain as meaning anything beyond "socialism bad", but eventually when I was 12 or something, I did ask what he meant by those specific words.

And he said: socialists establish control of valuable resources and then create an artificial scarcity of these resources, so that they can then use them as a tool of control by deciding who gets and doesn't get those resources.

And I thought that was wrong. I mean, are socialists misguided? Sure. But to claim that they deliberately create scarcity as a means of political control? That seemed far-fetched.

But, of course, he was entirely correct.

[Benjamin Weingarten @bhweingarten]

Critical outstanding question raised by the Court's disastrous Birthright Citizenship ruling: What does it suggest, if anything, about how the Court will rule on whether non-citizens must or can be counted in the census?

[Jeff Clark @JeffClarkUS]

I had worked on this inside the Trump 47 Admin.

[Aakash Gupta @aakashgupta]

Your 6-hour flight from LA to New York is about to become a 3-hour flight. And it's legal because engineers figured out how to bend sound.

Since 1973 it's been a federal crime for any passenger plane to fly faster than the speed of sound over American soil. That's why your cross-country flight takes the same 6 hours it took your parents in the 80s. Planes got safer and more efficient. They never got faster. The law made faster illegal.

The original reason was real. In the 60s the government flew supersonic jets over Oklahoma City 8 times a day for 6 months to test public reaction. The booms cracked plaster, broke windows, and generated nearly 10,000 complaints. So the FAA banned the speed itself.

Here's what changed. The speed of sound isn't constant. It shifts with air temperature, which shifts with altitude. Fly high enough and fast enough in the right conditions and the shockwave physically bends, curving back up into the sky before it reaches the ground. The boom still happens. It just never lands.

NASA measured what people underneath actually hear: a faint rumble about as loud as normal street noise. No crack. No broken windows.

So the FAA's new rule flips the logic. Instead of banning the speed, it caps the sound allowed to hit the ground. Stay quiet and you can fly as fast as the plane will go. Boom already proved the tech works in a real test flight last year.

The last time you could fly supersonic, a Concorde ticket cost about $12,000 round trip and only crossed the ocean. The next version flies over land, over your house, and you'll never hear it coming.

[DataRepublican (small r) @DataRepublican]

Horrifying interview about the intersection of the Deep Swamp and technological innovation.

[Jeff Clark @JeffClarkUS]

Pleasantly surprised to see that the Barfare shoe can easily be fitted on the other foot.

[Dan Schwartz @Dan_Schwartz]

Hey @HansMahncke: Barfare!
CC @JeffClarkUS
@SidneyPowell1
@DrJohnEastman

[Hans Mahncke @HansMahncke]

Michael Dreeben representing Comey is like the chief architect of lawfare stepping into the defense seat of the system he helped construct.

Dreeben was one of the key legal minds behind Mueller, with Weissmann playing more of the attack dog than the legal mastermind. Dreeben later reappeared in the Jack Smith operation for the same purpose, keeping the same lawfare thread running through it all.

So out of more than a million attorneys, it is pretty remarkable that these same characters always keep resurfacing.

[Steve Lance @SteveLanceNTD]

@JeffClarkUS , vice president of litigation at Oversight Project, discussed with me, the U.S. Supreme Court's Tuesday ruling upholding birthright citizenship, how Congress could change the law on birthright citizenship, and called for the mass deportation of illegal immigrants in the wake of the decision.

[Steve Lance @SteveLanceNTD]

The Birthright Citizenship ruling is not the end says @JeffClarkUS, Vice President of Litigation at Oversight Project, who mentioned that Justice Kavanaugh left the door open for a legislative fix to the issue of birthright citizenship.

He mentioned that the oversight project recommends mass deportations, especially for women of childbearing age in light of the recent decision.

Watch my full interview with @JeffClarkUS on NTD’s @capitolreport
https://t.co/UKb9u4OhLa

[Jeff Clark @JeffClarkUS]

You’re making no sense.

In the real world, one must pay attention to the enemies of the Republican and American nationalism. You just can’t live in a bubble world and repeat a Dorothy-like mantra of “MAGA, MAGA, MAGA” (“there’s no place like home …”) and think that’s a strategy.

I’m the most vehement anti-communist I know.

If you’re not going to say constructive things, then please don’t interrupt my feed.

[Jeff Clark @JeffClarkUS]

+1 Well, what do you know, Kaitlin Collins proven wrong here by the admissions of a Democrat Socialist of America leader himself.

Here he admits his goal is communism. And much more.

DSA = Communism

Click on the link below and watch the video.

https://t.co/sKyV0VJmzm

[Jeff Clark @JeffClarkUS]

Had Kaitlin Collins been alive in 1917 in St. Petersburg, she would have been telling Kerensky right up to the October Revolution that the Bolsheviks were misunderstood.

https://t.co/h5w5eG54so

[Andrew Kolvet @AndrewKolvet]

Official transcript from the US Senate on May 30, 1866. Senator Jacob Howard, who introduced the 14th Amendment:

"This will not, of course, include persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens...”

SCOTUS got this ruling 100% wrong. A total travesty.

[Jeff Clark @JeffClarkUS]

@nedryun @chiproytx Yes, that was yeoman service to the Republic.

[Wade Miller @WadeMiller]

Harry Reid is to the right of most of the current Senate Republican caucus.

[Jeff Clark @JeffClarkUS]

@skylark1984 That’s a quote from John Eastman so others are clear.

[Jeff Clark @JeffClarkUS]

My constitutional analysis below is similar to John Eastman's which I've just read and commend you to read.

He roots the point that the English understanding of citizenship does not control in the radical break provided by the theory of the Declaration of Independence, whose 250th anniversary we celebrate in just 4 days.

More like Justice Kavanaugh's concurrence in his judgment/dissent (which would have held that birthright citizenship was not eternally hard-wired into the Fourteenth Amendment), I root the same point in the fact that constitutional analysis must be flexible enough to take on new circumstances and challenges -- and, most importantly, also be able to thwart attempts to circumvent its text and purpose.

By different routes, Eastman, Kavanaugh, and I get to the same end point.

I should also note that I agree with John's path, since the Declaration did indeed announce a radically different theory of citizenship and enshrine that for our people on these shores.

https://t.co/GEhKOk8MEG

[Jeff Clark @JeffClarkUS]

Re the Birthright Citizenship disaster opinion:

Remember the Supreme Court’s fascination with international law? It was not all that long ago.

Yeah, well the Supreme Court majority’s sterile insistence on history just made us the laughing stock of the international community of nations.

China is especially doubled over in belly laughs at this point about how stupid the United States is.

And that laughing fit is going to last, and for months.

The common law history arose before Britain faced waves of illegal immigration and was happy to augment its population in the 18th Century and extend the liberties of Englishmen to its new entrants.

We now live in a very different age.

The opinion reads like the Supreme Court radically enforcing a New Deal policy designed to fight deflation (the analogue here of citizenship policy running from the Founding to Reconstruction) when we now live in an age of inflation (our current age of hordes of illegal immigrant invaders in many instances foisted on us by foreign entities and NGOs trying to destroy America, especially in light of its costly welfare system).

And Kavanaugh’s insistence on Wong Kim Ark as governing precedent is especially wrong because the parents there had lawful permanent resident status.

[Jeff Clark @JeffClarkUS]

Please review all of our statements on the birthright citizenship case. Here’s mine in particular:

“The Constitution is both a functional document yet one designed to attain legal stability. The majority opinion errs both by ignoring the functional nature of our national charter (allowing it to be circumvented) and by radically fomenting legal, political, and cultural instability.

The pro-citizenship-as-soil-birth approach that animated Eighteenth Century Britain is not our problem in Twenty-First Century America. The Supreme Court and the Reconstruction Congress rightly rejected Dred Scott to ensure that black slaves and their descendants were American citizens. We also evolved to give Native Americans full U.S. Citizenship, but the North American States of our country was also their country of birth. We could have preserved those wins without allowing foreign invaders to claim citizenship rights by birthing their children inside our borders.

This decision will dramatically destabilize the American body politic and our distinct culture. It is a massive win for the political party that seeks to import voters from foreign nations unfamiliar with our institutions, our laws, and our habits – because it can no longer persuade the majority of native-born Americans to vote for them.

We have flung open our gates to foreign NGOs strategizing against us and turned a blind eye to efforts by Communist China, through their intermediaries and Latin American communist governments, to nudge foreign invaders north across the Rio Grande to overwhelm our generous social safety net, plunging us further into debt. We have also flung open our gates to Communist Chinese birth tourism, which would have been unthinkable to me just 10 years ago. Today, I weep for our nation, and that is no exaggeration.”

[Oversight Project @ItsYourGov]

Read our full statement here: https://t.co/46aIOS2mh7

[Jeff Clark @JeffClarkUS]

@DianneK57 His opinion concurred in the judgment and dissented in part. So he was neither wholly with the majority or with the other full-on dissenters.

[Jeff Clark @JeffClarkUS]

Re the Birthright Citizenship disaster opinion:

Remember the Supreme Court’s fascination with international law? It was not all that long ago.

Yeah, well the Supreme Court majority’s sterile insistence on history just made us the laughing stock of the international community of nations.

China is especially doubled over in belly laughs at this point about how stupid the United States is.

And that laughing fit is going to last, and for months.

The common law history arose before Britain faced waves of illegal immigration and was happy to augment its population in the 18th Century and extend the liberties of Englishmen to its new entrants.

We now live in a very different age.

The opinion reads like the Supreme Court radically enforcing a New Deal policy designed to fight deflation (the analogue here of citizenship policy running from the Founding to Reconstruction) when we now live in an age of inflation (our current age of hordes of illegal immigrant invaders in many instances foisted on us by foreign entities and NGOs trying to destroy America, especially in light of its costly welfare system).

And Kavanaugh’s insistence on Wong Kim Ark as governing precedent is especially wrong because the parents there had lawful permanent resident status.

[Jeff Clark @JeffClarkUS]

Listen to me and @MHowellTweets on @SeanStations today!

[The Sean Hannity Show @SeanStations]

TODAY 6/30/26: The latest on the Biden open scandal with @ItsYourGov’s @MHowellTweets + @JeffClarkUS, @GreggJarrett on the SCOTUS birthright citizenship ruling, and MO Senator @SenEricSchmitt

[Mike Howell @MHowellTweets]

Reminder: right after Trump won, the very first thing that blue states identified as their top litigation effort was birthright citizenship.

We smoked it out.

It's always been about securing the gains of illegal immigration.

[Amber Duke @ambermarieduke]

Conservative group makes the following recommendations to help combat birthright citizenship ruling:

- Prioritize deportations of parents of anchor babies
- Tax illegal aliens for giving birth in the US
- Targeted deportations based on how many illegal family members would be caught in the net
- Station ICE outside of hospitals and birthing centers
- Ban visas from countries that participate in birth tourism