🚨The Red-Green Alliance between Marxists and Muslims is NOT an accident. The radical Left has spent decades weakening the institutions, traditions, and beliefs that hold Western civilization together.
Muslims in America see the opening. This isn’t about freedom of religion. It’s Islam being fundamentally at odds with the American constitutional order.
It does not seek assimilation. It seeks transformation. The objective is not simply to live alongside the West, but to completely conquer and remake it.
And the radical Left is clearing the path by legitimizing the ideology, embedding it deeper into our institutions, and driving Americans away from their own history, culture, and civilization.
Their end goals differ, but their common cause in degrading the Western principles that stand in their way.
This isn’t a distant threat. It’s happening right in front of our eyes.
Pete Hegseth is everything the DC establishment hates, and that’s why they’re making him a scapegoat.
He transformed the Department of War from a gay, woke, weak cesspool into a deadly fighting force once again. He has inspired our warriors to serve their country, not their ideology. He has made it clear to our enemies that the United States military will not be mocked.
That is his real “crime” against the establishment that was managing America’s decline.
They’re trying to make this all about the Iran War. But that’s Trump’s conflict. If you think it’s an illegal war, your argument is with the man we elected as Commander-in-Chief, not the man he chose to run the department.
Since the 1950s, Frankfurt School ideas that stigmatized male authority figures have blended with postwar American liberalism to create a rival US constitution. The military was one of many institutions reshaped by that. We need to understand what happened and change it at once.
The Frankfurt School's ideas didn't take over our schools, agencies, NGOs, and military by accident. It was a long march, carried out on purpose, and it left woke ideology embedded in our society.
@SecWar is right. There’s no compatibility between its teachings and American constitutionalism. Waiting for the pendulum to swing back won't undo it. It has to be reversed just as deliberately.
.@SECWAR “The philosophical doctrines of the Frankfurt School – critical theory and the corrosive apparatus of ‘Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion’ – are fundamentally INCOMPATIBLE with military service and antithetical to the Constitution of the United States.”
“Michigan is the capital of Arab America.”
Senator-elect Abdul El-Sayed makes the claim during remarks in Washington, D.C., pointing to Michigan’s large Arab American population.
For anyone with newfound interest in the topic of affordability, we spent a lot of time over the winter and spring working on this issue, with dozens of ideas in specific essential living buckets. Some very good ideas, and I’m sure some bad ideas, but we need to have thoughtful discussion on how to solve these issues, and new ideas are always welcome.
https://t.co/UoCWyTrZX7
“It is the burden and duty of good people, of all walks of life, to understand that you will always be accused of raising the alarm too loudly. If you wait until the point that the worst outcome is so obvious that no one can deny it, you’ve already lost the battle.”
An important message by the new White House Chief of Staff @StephenM 🎯
🚨Texas: “The Republicans are so Islamophobic, that the entire state, to their surprise, actually turned into blue… this is a chance for us Muslims to grab by the will of Allah.”
America isn’t finished.
America faces hurdles, but it is the duty of good men and women to stand up and continue to press for the solutions our country needs.
CRA’s @MichelleVought joins @EagleEdMartin to discuss CRA’s fight against the weaponization of the 2020 Census and the use of differential privacy, the push for accurate, citizen-based representation, and the growing threat of the Red-Green Alliance, the coalition between Marxists and Muslims seeking to undermine our constitutional system.
FUNNY HOW SOME REPUBLICANS FIND THEIR BACKBONE THE MINUTE THEY LOSE POWER! 😂
Michelle Vogt from the Center for Renewing America joined me with a fascinating take on Congress.
When Republicans are in the minority, they can pound their fists, make fiery speeches, and promise to fight... because nobody expects them to DELIVER!
We also dug into the census controversy and how Michelle says it could be distorting seats in Congress! 🗳️
VOTE! 🗳️ VOTE! 🗳️ VOTE! 🗳️
Catch our conversation on "Early Bird With Ed Martin," on @RealAmVoice!
The left is getting bent out of shape over this piece that argues that those who have personally and specifically embraced the destruction or overthrow of the constitution and the constitutional order and continued to hold that view be denied the ability to take the oath of office.
This isn’t a test about differences of opinion on what the Constitution does and doesn’t say, nor is it a test that punishes good faith disagreements, nor is it a test about good faith proposals to change and improve the Constitution. Quite literally, do you think the Constitution should be destroyed? If so, how can you take an oath to it?
That should be a bi-partisan consensus and the test is so narrow as to be unobjectionable.
It says a lot about how anti-American and anti-Constitution the left has become that they believe the opposite, that people who currently believe the Constitution should be destroyed should be allowed into Congress.
https://t.co/FfANLjFH8V
There is no human right to illegal immigration, but there is a right to remain a sovereign nation.
We want to remain a sovereign nation, and so should you.
What is the punishment for leaving Islam? Death.
That is barbaric and completely incompatible with the U.S. Constitution.
Sharia has no place in America!
🚨 Congress has a constitutional responsibility to ensure that every member sworn into office can honestly take the oath and faithfully uphold the Constitution.
In @FDRLST, CRA’s @armanigracia addresses the rising concerns about whether candidates and sitting members like Abdul El-Sayed, Ilhan Omar, and Darializa Avila Chevalier can faithfully swear to uphold the Constitution, given their statements, associations, and political commitments.
This isn’t a partisan question. It’s a question of national security and constitutionalism.
The bottom line is this: The oath of office must be treated as a solemn commitment, not just a formality. The Constitution must be defended by those who swear to uphold it.
https://t.co/ytE4Y32H6h
A nation can’t preserve its own identity if we’re expected to bend to accommodate every cultural practice, even when they completely go against our own.
🚨 OMG. Outrage is erupting after a Muslim walked straight up to the mic at the Pinellas County FL Board meeting and put the ISLAMIC CALL TO PRAYER on FULL BLAST
Fully covered in a burka. Pure women oppression mode, wanting to conquer and invade the West
The Board members told her to stop the tape and she kept on playing it, and a law enforcement officer stepped in!
BAN THEM FROM PLAYING THIS IN GOVERNMENT MEETINGS and over loudspeakers that anger local residents!
NO ISLAMIC INVASION IN FLORIDA ☀️
h/t @libsoftiktok
🚨@FoxNews highlights CRA's constitutional roadmap examining whether Congress can refuse to seat a member-elect whose words, actions, and commitments conflict with the constitutional oath.
Our work outlines the Article VI argument, relevant Supreme Court precedent, and procedural steps available to the House to challenge the swearing-in of a member-elect who has demonstrated an intent to subvert the Constitution, such as Darializa Avila Chevalier, who tweeted about wiping her hands with the American flag and lead a group calling for the total eradication of Western civilization.
The constitutional oath is not a formality. It’s a commitment to defend the very system of government that member is elected to serve.
https://t.co/RCopc0vSwa
YOU CANNOT SWEAR TO DEFEND THE CONSTITUTION AND ALSO BE COMMITTED TO ITS DESTRUCTION.
As DSA candidates and the Red-Green Alliance gains influence, a serious constitutional question demands an answer: can Congress seat someone who has openly embraced the destruction of the very system they’re taking an oath to uphold?
The answer is no and in our latest primer, we make the legal argument that Congress has the constitutional authority to refuse to seat a member-elect who has personally committed to destroying our constitutional order and therefore cannot truthfully take the oath required to hold office.
Read more here👇 https://t.co/rW93AfmzAg