K'U'X Wolf(gang)sant

Humanum, improbe Alius

[K'U'X Wolf(gang)sant @jeffgisant]

They tell you to stop. But life is movement. Don’t fall asleep on your laurels.

[K'U'X Wolf(gang)sant @jeffgisant]

The 5 philosophers who redefined how to think:

➣ Socrates said: Question everything

➣ Aristotle said: Order the world

➣ Descartes said: Doubt everything

➣ Nietzsche said: Create your values

➣ Foucault said: Power goes through everything

[K'U'X Wolf(gang)sant @jeffgisant]

The conscious action that comes from the walking break subdetermines the future.

[K'U'X Wolf(gang)sant @jeffgisant]

There is something revolutionary about the act of cleaning. Don’t just clarify your space: free your mind.

[K'U'X Wolf(gang)sant @jeffgisant]

In AI, reading and writing is co-creating with machines. These authors redefine the map:

➣ Naomi S. Baron said: Delegating in AI erodes our own abilities.

· Why: Externalizing reading and writing makes us lose authorship and critical thinking.

[K'U'X Wolf(gang)sant @jeffgisant]

In AI, reading and writing is co-creating with machines. These authors redefine the map:

➣ Naomi S. Baron said: Delegating in AI erodes our own abilities.

· Why: Externalizing reading and writing makes us lose authorship and critical thinking.

[K'U'X Wolf(gang)sant @jeffgisant]

@TommiPedruzzi Guide

[The Ways of A Gentleman @Gentleman_Ways]

“Inaction breeds doubt and fear. Action breeds confidence and courage. If you want to conquer fear, do not sit home and think about it. Go out and get busy.”

-Dale Carnegie

[Mustafa @oprydai]

most people think mathematics is about being good with numbers. it isn’t.

mathematics is the discipline of seeing patterns.

• patterns in change.
• patterns in structure.
• patterns in logic.
• patterns in uncertainty.

build a mathematical mind by Albert rutherford argues that mathematical thinking is a skill, not a talent.

you develop it by asking:
• what stays the same?
• what changes?
• what repeats?
• what constrains the system?
• what is the simplest rule that explains this?

that is why mathematics reaches so far beyond the classroom.

the same pattern-recognition machinery powers engineering, programming, physics, finance, and science.

a mathematical mind doesn’t memorize formulas.
it learns to compress complexity into structure.

[Lectócratas @lectocratas]

📚 ECONOMÍA PARA EL 99% DE LA POBLACIÓN 📚

✍️ Ha-Joon Chang (2014)

📥 DESCARGA GRATUITA:
https://t.co/avSWxExBuS

Lectócratas | Lectura Política

[Millie Marconi @MillieMarconnni]

A Chicago philosopher wrote one book in 1940 proving that 95% of the books you have read in your life, you didn't actually read, and Charlie Munger has been telling people to read it for 50 years.

His name was Mortimer Adler.

He spent 40 years at the University of Chicago, ran the editorial board of the Encyclopædia Britannica, and built his entire career on one uncomfortable observation about the people around him.

Most adults who called themselves well-read had not actually read a book in the real sense even once. They had run their eyes over the pages, registered the words, formed a vague impression, and put it back on the shelf.

The book had passed through them without ever entering them.

In 1940 he wrote How to Read a Book. It has stayed in print for 86 years.

Charlie Munger recommends it. Naval Ravikant recommends it. Fareed Zakaria recommends it.

Every serious thinker who builds a career on absorbing information eventually finds their way to this book, and the reason is that Adler had isolated something nobody else was naming clearly.

There are four levels of reading. Almost everyone is stuck on the second one. The fourth level is so different from what most people call reading that you have probably never done it in your entire life.

Level one is elementary.

You learn it as a child. You decode the letters into words and the words into sentences. You finish the sentence and understand roughly what it said. This is reading the way a 7-year-old reads, and almost every adult on earth has stopped developing past this point in some quiet way.

Level two is inspectional.

This is skimming. You move through a book quickly to figure out what it is broadly about. You read the back cover, scan the table of contents, glance at a few paragraphs, and form an opinion. Most adults who claim to have read 50 books a year are actually doing this. They are inspecting books, not reading them. They walk away with a vague sense of the argument and almost none of the evidence that supports it.

Level three is analytical.

This is the level Adler said most people have never properly experienced. You take one book and you wrestle with it for as long as it takes. You identify the question the author is trying to answer. You map their argument from front to back. You write your disagreements in the margins. You force yourself to articulate, in your own words, what the author is claiming and why. The point is not to finish the book. The point is to argue with it as if the author were sitting across the table from you. Most people never do this once in their life, because it is exhausting and slow and feels nothing like the reading they were taught as children.

Level four is the one almost nobody knows exists. Adler called it syntopical reading. The word means "across topics," and the technique is something closer to running a small private research lab in your own head.

You pick a single question that actually matters to you. How does power corrupt people. Why do civilizations collapse. What makes a marriage last. How does a person change their own mind. Then you assemble five or ten or twenty books from different authors, different centuries, different traditions, all of them taking a swing at the same question.

You do not read any of them cover to cover. You move between them. You find the chapter in book three that addresses the same question as the chapter in book seven. You force those two authors to argue with each other inside your own head.

The book stops being the unit of reading. The question becomes the unit. And the authors become voices in a conversation you are now hosting.

This is the level where reading stops being consumption and starts being construction.

You are no longer absorbing what someone else thinks. You are building a position of your own out of the friction between people who disagreed.

Adler argued that this is the only level of reading where you stop being a passive receiver of other people's ideas and start being someone who can produce ideas of their own.

The reason Charlie Munger has been recommending this book for 50 years is that this is exactly how Munger has always thought. He calls it building a latticework of mental models. The technique he is describing is just syntopical reading applied for a lifetime.

You take the strongest insight from psychology, the strongest insight from biology, the strongest insight from economics, and you stack them against the same problem until something new falls out the bottom.

The reason most people never reach level four is not that it is intellectually difficult. It is that it is logistically uncomfortable. It requires you to keep multiple books open at once.

It requires you to take notes that nobody is going to grade. It requires you to abandon the goal of finishing books and replace it with the goal of answering questions.

This is also why AI just changed everything Adler was teaching.

NotebookLM, Claude, and tools like them let you do syntopical reading at a speed that would have looked like magic to a Chicago philosopher in 1940.

You upload 10 books on the same question. You ask the AI to surface every place those authors agree and every place they contradict each other.

The technique Adler said almost nobody on earth had reached can now be run on a Sunday afternoon by anyone with a laptop and one good question.

The technique was always the unlock. The bottleneck used to be time. The bottleneck is now curiosity.

Most people will keep reading the way they always have. A book at a time. Eyes over the pages. No question driving it. No other authors in the room. Adler called that level two for a reason.

You are not behind on your reading list.

You are behind on the level you are reading at.

[K'U'X Wolf(gang)sant @jeffgisant]

@smratitiwa86867 NEED

[smrati tiwari @smratitiwa86867]

🚨 119𝐆𝐁+ 𝐆𝐎𝐎𝐆𝐋𝐄 𝐃𝐑𝐈𝐕𝐄 — 𝐀𝐋𝐋 𝐏𝐀𝐈𝐃 𝐂𝐎𝐔𝐑𝐒𝐄𝐒 🚨

𝐌𝐢𝐬𝐬𝐞𝐝 𝐢𝐭 𝐥𝐚𝐬𝐭 𝐭𝐢𝐦𝐞? 𝐈’𝐦 𝐝𝐫𝐨𝐩𝐩𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐢𝐭 𝐚𝐠𝐚𝐢𝐧. 👌

This vault helped agencies close $9K+ clients using proven systems.

Inside the Drive:
📁 AI & Automation
📁 Ethical Hacking
📁 Cybersecurity
📁 Prompt Engineering
📁 Google Cloud
📁 Machine Learning
📁 DevOps + CI/CD
📁 Docker & Kubernetes
📁 Blockchain
📁 Power BI
📁 React + Node
📁 Cloud Security
📁 Linux
📁 Pen Testing
📁 Data Analytics
📁 Data Science
📁 Big Data
📁 SQL
📁 Tableau
📁 Python
📁 AWS
📁 Java

Everything organized. Everything premium. 119GB+ value.

Get it:
✔ Follow me [MusT]
✔ Like & RT+bookmark
✔ Comment “ NEED ” To Get Auto DM.

⚠️ No follow = No Access ⚠️

[Centro de Estudios Políticos y Constitucionales @cepcgob]

Nuevo libro del @cepcgob
Max Weber. Ciencia, religión, política, de Joaquín Abellán
#ColecciónEstudiosPolíticos
Publicación electrónica de descarga gratuita disponible en https://t.co/9Z2gy88uH5 (1/4)

[Lectócratas @lectocratas]

📖 El hombre político — Seymour Martin Lipset (1960)
DESCARGA GRATUITA https://t.co/5zkeP2J1ac

Introducción
"La sociología política abarca fundamentalmente dos áreas: un análisis de las tensiones sociales y los movimientos políticos, y otro estudio del proceso de integración sociopolítica, del que derivan las instituciones."
🧵1/12

[K'U'X Wolf(gang)sant @jeffgisant]

The 5 philosophers who redefined how to think:

➣ Socrates said: Question everything

➣ Aristotle said: Order the world

➣ Descartes said: Doubt everything

➣ Nietzsche said: Create your values

➣ Foucault said: Power goes through everything

[K'U'X Wolf(gang)sant @jeffgisant]

The 5 most important Jews:

➣ Abraham said: The law is everything

➣ Jesus said: Love is everything

➣ Marx said: The State is everything

➣ Freud said: Sex is everything

➣ Einstein said: Everything is relative

[K'U'X Wolf(gang)sant @jeffgisant]

The 5 most important Jews:

➣ Abraham said: The law is everything

➣ Jesus said: Love is everything

➣ Marx said: The State is everything

➣ Freud said: Sex is everything

➣ Einstein said: Everything is relative

[le_jugon @JugonLe]

Absolutamente increíble. Que joya de lectura. Trinquen, por dios, trinquen!!

[Lectócratas @lectocratas]

📚GIOVANNI SARTORI X5📚
DESCARGA GRATUITA

📕La política: lógica y método en las ciencias sociales https://t.co/mR3EckItkX
📗Cómo hacer ciencia política: lógica, diseño y método https://t.co/03Rj0ETHUk
📙Ingeniería constitucional comparada https://t.co/lETbaOYCMw
📘Homo videns https://t.co/al35gai507
📕¿Qué es la democracia? https://t.co/v7iOe9MB18

Lectócratas | Lectura Política