Jeff Rossiter

[Jeff Rossiter @JeffRossiter]

@EricBalchunas @JSeyff Why is this only vaguely sorted? (See Finland)

[Jeff Rossiter @JeffRossiter]

@loomdart wait until you discover cookie scoops

[Jeff Rossiter @JeffRossiter]

@DogCryptoThe @trueblocks might be helpful

[Jeff Rossiter @JeffRossiter]

@MikeMcDonald89

[Jeff Rossiter @JeffRossiter]

@etherscan Add your labels to the api

[Jeff Rossiter @JeffRossiter]

@MikeMcDonald89 https://t.co/KSfB23ZzDV

This is close, maybe @MSTR_Tracker premium has the right thing, or could make it

[Jeff Rossiter @JeffRossiter]

@scott_seiver @cuntycakes123 There’s only one ultra wide on the market that is equivalent to dual 4k monitors and it���s expensive, heavy and reviews are meh. I’ve still considered buying it but probably waiting until it’s a mainstream product.

[Jeff Rossiter @JeffRossiter]

@plotchy that's a cool theory, but
a) they submitted the wrong solution after 3 minutes, correct after 8 min.
b) Shezmu attacker sent a message to bigbrainchad before contract deployment, bigbrainchad replied before the solution txs

https://t.co/m1HzdJbhh7

[Jeff Rossiter @JeffRossiter]

@PrimordialAA That’s the exact opposite of what I read in the replies. Most people saying psychedelics don’t lead to addiction. Didn’t see anyone say heroin/cocaine is totally fine.

[Jeff Rossiter @JeffRossiter]

@MikeMcDonald89 @tommartell this is the initial tweet? It's a giant wall of text but one paragraph starts with "I am addressing biological differences. Men are more competitive (on average)."
https://t.co/MRBRWAJhKw

[bencb @bencb789]

I really don't care. I can take the heat. I will share my opinion even if it upsets people because they cannot handle reality.

I know very well what is going on here. Someone sees a controversial topic and takes the opportunity to farm engagement with zero logic, twisting things around, and lying to make me look bad so they can get support from "the other side."

However, I love to see how many from our community agree on this topic and try to argue with reasoning instead of just throwing around buzz terms (there are exceptions, of course).

If we can't even have a debate on why we have more men being successful at poker (or chess, or esports, or any similar "thinking sport"), we are doomed.

If, the moment someone shares an opinion you don't agree with (even if you heavily disagree), you call it racist, right-wing extremist, or misogynistic, we are heading in the wrong direction.

I mean, I kind of predicted what was going to happen.

So, @BlaiseBourgeois, where exactly have I said "Men Brain better"? Do you feel better purposefully lying to make me look worse? Classic drama engagement farming.

If you would really care, you would have reached out.
"Ben lets talk about, lets jump on a Podcast, I think you are wrong, I want to make a change, I want to contribute to a better place for women".
(or anything like that).

You could prove how much you care, to take action.
Your retweet will CHANGE ZERO of the things you address.

So do you really care?
No you don't, because all you want is a bit of attention at the cost of someone else, you know very well that you lack logic and knowledge.

What are these entry barriers for live poker for women? I am fully aware that some men mistreat women, and this needs to change, but what does my opinion have to do with that?
Men also experience mistreatment, are insulted, and victims of racism. But we care less.
Am I excusing this? No!
But men are LESS emotional than women. And this is an advantage in poker. Also, we can defend ourselves better, verbally and physically (hello, biology).
That's why I also want to see harsher punishment for men who show any kind of harassment towards women.

Again, this is a fact. This is why men have an advantage. And that was the question: "Why do men have an advantage?" Some of these advantages are simply nature, and some of them are indeed barriers that need to change, but still, men have a lot of advantages in their competitive nature.

Also, what does "normalized" mean? In the West, we live in very liberal times where you can do whatever you want.
Even if that's the case, let's assume you are right and there are really so many entry barriers that women cannot participate in poker tournaments on a large scale.
Then we should see numerous top female online players, right? Oh, wait...
But I guess we will find other areas where it is obvious that my take is off, and women compete at the same level as men.

What about chess? What about esports? Do we find teams and players playing at the same level even though we have 40-50% female gamers these days in certain titles?
But I guess it is not normalized there either?
Is harassment happening in chess too? Is this the main reason for you?
By the way, men are victims of insults and racism in gaming too. Again, we can suck it up better.

But let me make this clear: this is not against women. This is simply stating facts, reading statistics, and then trying to explain them. And no, harassment alone is not the main reason. If that hurts you, well, deal with it.

I am addressing biological differences. Men are more competitive (on average). Yes, if a woman develops the competitive drive of a man, she can compete very well. We have seen many great female poker players competing at the same level as men do, but this is simply not the norm.

Nowhere have I said "Women can not compete".
I said, Men have a competitive advantage.
But of course if sounds better the other way around for some people to, again, make someone else look purposefully bad.

That is called biology. I am not buying into this 2024 woke agenda that we are the same. We are different, and that's good. That is wonderful.
Men have strengths, Men have weaknesses.
Women have strengths, Women have weaknesses.

Don't you think a man has it easier to "grind in loneliness," work his ass off, and sacrifice some of the fun stuff for a couple of months to become really good at something?
This is what men often do when they start competing at something. They get more "obsessed"
And I do believe (and science has proven this over and over again) that more women will struggle with these extreme levels of competing and sacrificing a lot of things to reach that one goal.

Also, I find it very concerning how especially women are throwing around terms like sexist, racist, and misogynist.
You are trivializing these terms for people who are real victims. You are inflating their use, making it harder for people to speak up and address actual issues. This is what is happening in 2024: the moment you don't like an opinion, you call it racist, sexist, or misogynistic without even knowing what these terms mean.

This is called having a debate with different opinions. But this is the fault of the countless white knights, simps, and feminists who use these terms left and right to gain attention, jump on trends, feed their narcissistic personalities, and seek approval to make themselves feel better.

All at the cost of real victims who have it harder to speak up and bring attention to real problems.

And by the way, to all these people insulting me. I have probably done more for women in Esports/Gaming than all of you together. And I enjoyed it. I know that women can compete at high levels, but simply not to a scale as men. Period.
Instead of you, I just don't talk, I take action.
All your little hate comments don't do shit apart from making you feel better.
It divides us further.

[Jeff Rossiter @JeffRossiter]

@RuneKek farm HAT with/via CAT or farm HAT (CAT pool)

[Jeff Rossiter @JeffRossiter]

@danfinlay Did you verify either of these? Or are you just spreading more misinformation than the accused?

[Jeff Rossiter @JeffRossiter]

@SwannMarcus89 Average of top 10%. Probably implies 3-4% have that many and 10th percentile is 30-40 drinks

[Jeff Rossiter @JeffRossiter]

@ShaneBarratt I haven't got around to using it yet but @warpdotdev might be what you're after

[Jeff Rossiter @JeffRossiter]

@DanOBrienTahoe @abarber1 @Baalshin @balajis Do you think there are any goals other than maximizing innovation (/productivity/growth/wealth)? Do you think it’s insane if somebody else does?

[Jeff Rossiter @JeffRossiter]

@cobie @Evan_ss6 @cburniske what does that have to do with blockchains?

[Jeff Rossiter @JeffRossiter]

@austingriffith reth (+lighthouse) is 2 lines:
https://t.co/5YJlmEm19z

[Jeff Rossiter @JeffRossiter]

@peter_szilagyi the gap also includes people *avoiding* damage by using a private rpc

[Jeff Rossiter @JeffRossiter]

@barrygoldman1 @devonzuegel The y axis doesn’t go all the way to 1

100w incandescent bulbs are not the cheapest or dominant (not specified what is charted) source of light anymore. LED bulbs are much cheaper.

[Jeff Rossiter @JeffRossiter]

I thought this image was a portfolio recommendation

[Michael Saylor @saylor]

Choose Your Fighter