jerss

straight up terrible at Twitter. cried on C-SPAN. trash, esq.

[jerss @jelars]

@TheFreelyAshley @OgLakyn @esjesjesj "I love the Nutcracker" *doesn't recognize the iconic music of the Nutcracker when played on trumpet*

[jerss @jelars]

@Lynnnikkisweet @Variety Tell me you've never listened to a Springsteen song without telling me you've never listened to a Springsteen song 🤣

[jerss @jelars]

@WrightRealtor1 @GovPritzker Nah I think you're full of shit. Thanks for playing

[jerss @jelars]

@WrightRealtor1 @GovPritzker No? Naperville then? Hinsdale? Barrington, even?

[jerss @jelars]

@WrightRealtor1 @GovPritzker In Glen Ellyn? Sure, take 'em. But shut the fuck up about Chicago, you don't live here.

[demi adejuyigbe @electrolemon]

you guys are gonna keep naming popular songs that annoy you cause they’re played at target and i’m gonna keep saying “yea i’d probably enjoy that.” i got too much joie de vivre. i am a lover

[jerss @jelars]

@FrankieGonzo69 @_lizharvey They took him from us

[jerss @jelars]

@chaoticreign19 @nikkibyrd0910 @CocoaFox023 What real life knowledge or experience are you basing this on?

[jerss @jelars]

@apryl1776 @Betty_A_Scott @NoCapeNoProblm I'll check back in with you when there is admissible, relevant, not anonymous, non-hearsay evidence being offered on this subject and we'll see how the judge takes it.

[jerss @jelars]

@apryl1776 @Betty_A_Scott @NoCapeNoProblm I believe that the judge told the Baldoni team that the letter and accompanying affidavit were "of no use to the Court," "potentially defamatory," a "misuse of the Court's docket," and warned that they'd be sanctioned if they did it again (i.e. raised these allegations again)

[jerss @jelars]

@apryl1776 @Betty_A_Scott @NoCapeNoProblm April what do you know about my licensure that my employer and state bar doesn't? Should I be worried?

[jerss @jelars]

@apryl1776 @Betty_A_Scott @NoCapeNoProblm Also this was not an order issued against both parties. Only one party is being issued a warning here for misusing the docket.

[jerss @jelars]

@apryl1776 @Betty_A_Scott @NoCapeNoProblm Sorry, I'm like, a real lawyer, so maybe I'm just more sensitive to things like "judicial tone" and "threats to sanction"

[jerss @jelars]

@apryl1776 @Betty_A_Scott @NoCapeNoProblm April I fear we did not read the same court order, or if we did that perhaps you don't know how to read.

[jerss @jelars]

@apryl1776 @Betty_A_Scott @NoCapeNoProblm He struck the letter because the allegations contained in it were "improper," "irrelevant," and "potentially defamatory." And warned of sanctions if the attorneys brought it up again. And struck the related affidavit. This judge does not want to hear these allegations ever again

[jerss @jelars]

@KilluaMaraj @MariaPia174292 @Novajmorea @PopBase Yes, if Taylor Swift signs an affidavit tomorrow then I sure have egg on my face

[jerss @jelars]

@KilluaMaraj @MariaPia174292 @Novajmorea @PopBase Sure. But even in that hypothetical scenario, if I'm Blake's attorney, I will be using this judge's order to make an objection to that letter being used as evidence in any other case in the future. Which is a thing they can do.

[jerss @jelars]

@KilluaMaraj @MariaPia174292 @Novajmorea @PopBase I think you are confusing credibility with relevance. If the judge doesn't think it's credible (i.e. believable) in this case, it's unlikely he'd buy the allegations in another context.

[jerss @jelars]

@KilluaMaraj @MariaPia174292 @Novajmorea @PopBase The use of the words "libelous" and "potentially defamatory" don't give me the vibe that the judge found it particularly credible