The most shameful part of this is that the media is doing it intentionally. You have to purposefully not do your job for so many of these stories to consistently be unreported. It just doesn’t work that way naturally. People are making conscious decisions for political reasons to ignore these stories & young Americans watching TikTok & insta still think ICE murders people because Alex Pretti was killed while interfering in a law enforcement operation & putting himself at risk. The real murderers get away with it because the media runs cover for them & pushes one false narrative after another. They are not objective observers - they are complicit/co-conspirators.
Tell us you have no clue what the First Amendment says without telling us, you journalistic subtard.
No one is preventing CNN, Politico or the desiccated husk of MSNBC from writing or broadcasting whatever the hell they want.
However, they have no First Amendment right to privileged White House access.
And if you think there is such a right, then think it through. That means every citizen journalist on X has a First Amendment right to privileged White House access.
That makes about as much sense as your moronic, ill-advised, dysfunctional, ill-informed and wholly irrational post below.
Psyops psyops everywhere.
Ignore the sudden heavy anti-Trump push. It's not genuine. In fact, whenever you see a heavy political push come out of left field all in unison, it's programming. Paid agenda or bot-pushed.
🚨Study involving 1.7 million children has found that Myocarditis & Pericarditis only appeared in children who had received COVID mRNA vaccines.
Not a single unvaccinated child in the group suffered from these heart-related problems.
CNN is a real hard hitting truth seeking news organization and absolutely not a radical Leftist narrative pushing propaganda organization.
They will be missed in the White House…
Every glib, arrogant, virtue-signalling celebrity who’s broadcast the lie that kids will kill themselves if not allowed to transition deserves to have this read aloud to them non-stop through a megaphone for a year.
The city of Spokane is refusing to waive demolition permit fees for fire victims. After losing EVERYTHING, victims have to pay $500 to cap the water and sewer lines under their burned out house. What the fuck is the point of paying taxes? Just like California, Washington uses taxpayer dollars to buy crackpipes and heroin needles for unemployed homeless drug zombies, but when you, the working class taxpayer, lose everything you have through no fault of your own, you still have to pay for this?
These city leaders are so fucking petty they'll still force fire victims to pay $35 for permission to demolish their own destroyed home. Why? You couldn't just waive it? For $35? Yeah, it's not a lot of money, but that actually makes it worse...forcing a fire victim to cough up a meager sum that in NO way actually funds the process in any meaningful way just shows that you are doing it out of spite. Just a nice little "fuck you" to the peasants.
Additionally, the state of Washington is forcing fire victims to pay sales tax to replace the items they lost in the fire. Again...why? The state was never factoring in that revenue...it never existed on the balance sheet BUT for the fire. Government is collecting a windfall from people's LOSSES. There's literally zero need to collect taxes on shit that people already owned.
Back during the mid 90's floods, the state legislature passed a sales tax exemption for victims replacing their stuff. If they don't do this in their next leg session, they all need to go. The one thing WA did is cut property tax on their burned out homes, which is the absolute least they could do.
You assholes never maintain your forests, everybody lost everything, their pets burned alive, and now you're going tack on an extra 9.1% to the cost of rebuilding their lives...for what? Not to mention the fact that a couch today costs probably 2x as much as when they first bought the one they just lost. I fucking hate these people, man.
When Trump was banned from every major social media platform as the sitting President of the United States, CNN and MSNBC celebrated.
Now that they’re banned from the White House, they’re suddenly fans of the First Amendment?
They don’t have a Constitutional right to be on White House grounds, no one is infringing on their ability to do reporting. They’re welcome to do that from their studio.
Yes. In October 2009, Obama White House officials deliberately tried to exclude Fox News from a multi-network interview pool with the TARP pay czar. Emails show them saying “we’d prefer if you skip Fox.” Other networks refused to proceed without Fox, so it was reversed. Aides later confirmed a willingness to freeze Fox out of interviews.
Yes. The administration regularly barred independent photographers from many events and released only official White House photos instead. Nearly 40 news outlets, including the WHCA, protested this in 2013 as replacing independent journalism with visual press releases.
After the first Trump administration, my family spent money we did not have on lawyers because of multiple partisan Democrat led investigations into President Trump.
I watched as many of my friends also had no idea how to pay expensive legal bills because they simply served their country.
You can’t convince me Democrats won’t do this again.
Just so we’re clear: The Left does not get to decide how you raise your kids, practice your faith, or exercise your constitutional rights.
Those freedoms belong to you.
No. The First Amendment does not give CNN a chair in the West Wing.
What the First Amendment actually does
It stops the government from jailing reporters, shutting down a paper, or passing a law that says “this network may not publish.”
It does not create a right to a White House hard pass, a seat in the briefing room, or a question in the Oval.
The press can print whatever they want from the sidewalk. They still have cameras, websites, and the whole country. That is the freedom. Access to the building is not the freedom.