John Entermann

Ret. Physical Therapist

[John Entermann @jenterm1]

@MarioNawfal This leaves me wondering why the white ear buddha does not ask his guest how on this earth does she know this juicy inside intel - and with certainty?!

Or did I miss his ask?

[John Entermann @jenterm1]

What about the inauthentic irony here?

Whether it be Snyder, or this anonymous re-poster - what does it say about the strength of your serious certainty, when you choose to express it with hyperbole?

It’s at least an insult to serious readers who know it is imprecise, and therefore dishonest speech - to claim that, “NOBODY in the world thinks Trump is strong. NOBODY.” (emphasis mine.)

Alas, a weak post.

[John Entermann @jenterm1]

@MarioNawfal … but another special human like yourselves took that walking video - enabling you both to post about your special points. Yes?

[John Entermann @jenterm1]

“So accurate” … “Exactly”
‘Off to the races’ again. This time, those Texans!

Thanks for a refreshingly different post Gandalv - with your point, “not an American thing. It is a human thing”

Just wondering about the “faintly competitive” that is “underneath” this very ‘human thing,’ including the political “loud bit.”

Faintly? The wondering is about how boring it could be at the “proper party” you envisioned?

Especially if the “long table”-talk lacks robust political, personal and pious debate … faint and barely audible??

[John Entermann @jenterm1]

This account’s ideological campaign bombards on - same ordinance, different day:

TRUMPIANS ARE TRAMPS

Or blitzed today with Mr. G’s signature hyperbolic precise speech:

“Not a single” T-tramp “clown” rises to my/our/their “character.”
… or something.

This dreadfully dull drumbeat does come dressed with colorful and sophisticated prose.

I show up for that.

I also like to show up when an occasional ceasefire descends here - like the recent and useful melanoma education.

[John Entermann @jenterm1]

@RealCandaceO Not sure if the ol’ wily Candace sarcasm will suffice to punish the critics and skeptics - or to splain this particular phase of the family vacation with fisherman George.

[John Entermann @jenterm1]

I thought a few days on, it might dawn on me why someone would reply as you did, or now define “reply” itself.
It hasn’t ’dawned’ yet, likely because I’d need to clairvoyantly read your mind to discover your hidden ‘why.’

But credit is due for clarifying what you deem to be “a reply.”

I was obviously a bit naive in assuming it would be tethered to usual conversation, like response to a thread or the content of a post. Indeed, if you had even resorted to good ol’ name-calling like “smart ass,” at least you’d be descriptive of this poster and with some accuracy to boot!

Thanks of course to a free speech platform - you could evenreply with your local weather report, if “exactly” wished.

Your actual reply still landed as untethered, with your theory-as-fact that I “won’t be around” as long as you will be (proof from my bio’s “retired” mugshot?).
Then more “exactly” - you’re even “glad” about it!?

So all wrapped up in little more than a dozen words (if only I were so pithy):

While freely redefining rules of reply, you deftly dodge the bother of disclosing to this old geezer why you’re “glad” he’ll be outta here soon.
And I can imagine you being ‘bothered’ if you strayed from “exactly” the reply you needed - like engaging with my pet peeves with Gandalv, or in other profile posts.

To wrap, and indulge in a little gladsome conjecture of my own:
Instead of imagining your non-disclosure as some intimidation tactic hoping for some squirming under the dismissive disdain - maybe I’m way overthinking this guy!?

Maybe, it’s nothing more than ‘relief-glad’ that sooner-than-later the world and me will be freed from reading the geezer’s long-winded bloviating?

Even simpler (and another credit due):

You took on the initiative of reply (your brand to be sure) - likely more that the majority of X-readers manage!

So for engaging - thanx!

[John Entermann @jenterm1]

Maybe the way YOU “intended” your repost is exposed quite accurately in the Ra! Ra! of your replies.

Roughly, ‘lTrump’s a tramp.’

Couldn’t help but notice, ‘you posted a new bio likeness of your anonymous-self.’

But rather than divine your motive, I’ll just stay bemused by your ongoing posting flamboyance. That, despite the hyperbolic dishonesty.

And there’s been some doozies in the last 24 hours …
and of those, many could only remotely be honest certitude, if Dr. G. was a literal fly-on-the-wall with massive ears and eyes - on the power-walls of:

The EU, Russia, the Middle East and of course the ‘Footballer’s’ Whitehouse and Mar-a-Lago!

Alas, it seemeth such is the size of the ego (or similar chutzpah), triggered by the wiles of the current White House Resident.

[John Entermann @jenterm1]

As a frequent poster, Mr. Scaramucci launches with “actually …”

It’s surely reasonable for a reader to expect some factual conclusion to follow - that is, after sorting lesser prior notions.

However, in the Mooch’s case, past posts reveal earnest conclusions of certainty (‘actually’) - ad infinitum.

Today’s creative one is an alleged Trump flaw that will “actually … save us” from the scourge of the enigmatic flawed Trump:

“his disorganization.” Really.

Believe me - as an intrigued follower of this psychic chutzpah (but not a fan), there’s much more to come!

Actually.

[John Entermann @jenterm1]

“Only”??

A buddy retort shirt:

1. This is a joke - not literal, but maybe biased.
2. Nearly all jokes express partial truths (even teeny-weeny-partial ones).
3. In America there’s still freedom to risk offending someone (I think).
4. The shirt’s 5 hint at just a partial list of important stuff that Americans get to scrap about.
5. Some in America would dare to wear that shirt proudly (+ the MAGA hat!). Others never, ever … just about like most country’s personality split.

So “only” Mario?
Your laughing emoji could imply one of those partial-truth-jokes on the US enigma.

Or do I paranoidly sniff out a tad scorn from the ‘only’/more sophisticated Europeans (or even the Dubaideans?) - for the US riffraff?

Regardless, a Mario-vagueness seems to rule this post.

[John Entermann @jenterm1]

@SD3pete @Microinteracti1 Allrightythen!

Is it still a “reply” when nothing in it touches on the subject matter, for good or ill?

Especially since this one seems to exclusively touch on ill-will for the poster - even with a measure of glee?

[John Entermann @jenterm1]

@TaraBull Superficially by pigment, maybe ‘Poland putting Poland first?’

Deeper, no one seems aware that anyone else exists.

Maybe a worldwide “notice?”

[John Entermann @jenterm1]

It seems just pseudo window dressing to drag the US VP’s “suicide” comments into your otherwise relentless messaging:

‘Europe and Anonymous Me are SUPERIOR.’

And this every-post-fixation thing is distinct from the more obvious dishonesty of plucking 2 words, “civilizational empathy” from the VP’s context.

It only needed ‘giving the devil-JD his due’ - that he was obviously referencing the ‘suicidal empathy’ of unfettered, un-assimilated immigration.

But the rage seems to rule and redirect.

Look over there at our superiorities …

[John Entermann @jenterm1]

This anonymous account has long-gone made clear with repetition, its disdain for the US and our unboxable quirky President’s every move.

So I have a cliff note for this predictable ditto-post - formulaic:

US + Trump = Half-wits

This same ‘oily’ post with it’s not-so-slick attempt to smear the half-wit Trump with a genius Exxon exec’s wisdom - you cropped nicely yourself with the sarcasm, “Genius, really.”

And that, much like the end-post spasm a few hours later on Canada’s aluminum genius, v’s the half-wit: “Well done, Donald.”

Another ‘half-wit’ post …

We get it already! You’re flat-out full-wits over there!
Genius, really.

[John Entermann @jenterm1]

@Maccabi226km @MarioNawfal Ha! Sort of like, ‘I really don’t know … but I’m certain of this!’
- if I get your drift, with my seriously scant French?

[John Entermann @jenterm1]

“A masterclass in incompetence …”. Oui? Sérieux?

The French, irrefutably have gifted us some good things.

Besides the Statue of Liberty readily coming to mind, I’ve also thought of another - while this post of yesterday aged a little in my mind-cellar (as even an average French wine should).

The ‘another’ is a gift from 19th century French psychiatry:
“Delusions of grandeur” - a delusional disorder gifted not long after the Statue, right into our own now-coded APA “Delusional Disorders” (F22). But I digress …

When I read the Senator’s lofty geopolitical judgment, “a masterclass in incompetence,” I queried PDQ … from what possible delusional heights of grandeur would a Senator lob such an oratorical certainty?

Just as quick from the ether (my own facetious heights) came the reply: PRESIDENT MURPHY, of course! Or even higher!?

Even after climbing down from my sarcasm perch, I’m still left with a wonderment. i.e. given the every-post repetition of this ‘grandeur’ - what’s the point?

Thinking here of the (now quaint) notion of President Buchanan’s Senate as “The world’s greatest DELIBERATIVE body.”

As one of the Senator’s 1M+ Followers (not a fan), it’s delusional for me to view this relentless bombast as ‘deliberative’ in the sense of educational, thoughtful and nuanced.

But then it sure looks ‘deliberate’ - with the same habitually looping, hyperbolic firehose.

Maybe I’m still puzzling over what, or whose fire he’s after??

Oh, I was remiss in not pointing out that TDS seems inadequate to diagnose this Murphy’s Law Of Loquaciousness.

After all, homegrown and non-French, it’s not even officially codeable yet - as is DOG (“Delusions of Grandure”).

Still wondering …

[John Entermann @jenterm1]

MARIO’S GREAT ASSUMPTION: (all-caps are catchy)

See, right there in the middle of his all-caps: “SABOTAGE”

So why “IF” or assume only a sour spicy thing? What if Bibi actually had a sweet smart idea that the Donald recognized as such - or visa versa?

But to “IF”~along dramatic conspiracy verbiage of “blackmail” & “sabotage” - especially if dropped in the same sentence as the already-deviled Netanyahu … ahh, a spicy brew indeed!

Assumption that sells!

It likely sells too - from a likeable influencer with alluring guests, in an exotic location, strategically close enough to virtually peak under the Persian carpet.

So surely such a poster has insider evidence for my conspiracy!?

Then again, from the influencer’s chair …

Nuancing beyond (or before) “sabotage” is TOUGH work.

And how about UNCOMFORTABLE:
- admitting how little one might actually know about a near-mystical Middle East
- or confessing near-ignorance about the skill, motivations or trajectory of the Trump team’s deal making.

ASSUMPTION (as ass-u-me): Does have a sorry history of ‘making an ass out of you AND me.’

[John Entermann @jenterm1]

Thanks for clarifying.

Hopefully it still landed, that Epstein was not ‘another of Trump’s appointees’ as you stated?

But I do see now that you were simply declaring Epstein along with Netanyahu, to have “easily duped Trump.”

Do you have anything further ‘clarifying’ - as evidence that Trump is ‘so easily duped,’ expressed by you (and Joe K.) as if beyond debate?

Or maybe any support/insight not expressed by Joe?
Or that Joe (or others) have offered, and I missed it?