Jeremi DeHainaut

Father of nut jobs, master of no one

[Jeremi DeHainaut @jerrydmaxlil]

@covie_93 Why is this desecrating the White House? I have no clue why people have this take on this. It’s dirt bikes. Lots of people like this shit. I like this shit.

[Jeremi DeHainaut @jerrydmaxlil]

@BarbaraComstock You’re clueless. MAGA knows Iran is a threat that needs to be dealt with and a few months of high gas prices is well worth the risk. These fights represent America kicking ass and being a unique unpredictable force. Exactly what every immigrant came here to do. Sit down.

[Jeremi DeHainaut @jerrydmaxlil]

@CTID326376 🇺🇸 🇺🇸 🇺🇸 🇺🇸

[Jeremi DeHainaut @jerrydmaxlil]

@ImBreckWorsham I voted for exactly this!!!! And fucking up Iran and Venezuela and all of chinas cheap black market oil and closing the fckn border and kicking illegal fraudsters stealing taxpayer money the fck out! God bless ‘MERICA!!! 🇺🇸 tonight will be epic!!

[Jeremi DeHainaut @jerrydmaxlil]

@EdKrassen Relax and watch the show. So stupid. You clowns all just want to bitch and speak some sort of dumb ass moralism to spite a little bit of fun. Sit the fck down and relax and watch the fights. They’re gonna be great and GOD DAMN ‘MERICA!!! Does shit right. LFG!!

[Jeremi DeHainaut @jerrydmaxlil]

@harryjsisson This post is so dumb. This is peanuts. Focus on something important.

[Jeremi DeHainaut @jerrydmaxlil]

@MarkMaddenX It’s fckn fun. They are great fights. I’ll watch and enjoy every second. Fucking ‘Merica!!! LFG!! You have no fckn clue what Lincoln would think of this. Ridiculous! He’d prob love it.

[Jeremi DeHainaut @jerrydmaxlil]

@RoKhanna @BernieSanders Just stop the fraud first, please

[Jeremi DeHainaut @jerrydmaxlil]

@JoshYohe_PGH The problems is the narrative that our system is broken. There’s no doubt some struggles going on, but we live in the best times of humanity and everyone wants to bitch about it. This is a sign of prosperity. I don’t give a shit I can’t afford this ticket.

[Jeremi DeHainaut @jerrydmaxlil]

@MarkKaboly That’s a good trade for Cleveland. Weird take.

[Jeremi DeHainaut @jerrydmaxlil]

@MarkMaddenX Every single time. Try it caprese style with some basil mozzarella and roasted cherry tomatoes.

[Jeremi DeHainaut @jerrydmaxlil]

@SullyCNBC Probably a lot less vol too.

[Jeremi DeHainaut @jerrydmaxlil]

@MarkMaddenX This is the NFL covering all the bases. Gotta make sure you placate every demo, including the middle age wives/moms. Vrabel is seething at the behind the scenes. Total NFL HQ mandate.

[James Lindsay, anti-Communist @ConceptualJames]

What you see almost endlessly from Tucker Carlson, "Comic" Dave Smith, Theo Von, etc., and the rest of the blackpillers amounts to a Critical America Theory. I'm not making this up. I'm explaining.

Critical Theory was developed by neo-Marxist Max Horkheimer of the Frankfurt School in 1937. In an interview in 1969, Horkheimer explained what the Critical Theory is. He said (closely paraphrasing):

"I developed the Critical Theory because we [Western neo-Marxists] realized we cannot articulate the good or ideal society on the terms of the existing society. What we can do is criticize those aspects of the existing society that we wish to change."

In other words, a Critical Theory believes everything is so captured and corrupted by power and those who benefit from systems of power that it isn't even possible to talk about a better situation in clear terms. All that's available is criticism of why the system/society isn't better than it is. This activity has come to be known as identifying or "making visible" the various "problematics" in the existing system.

A Critical Theory OF SOMETHING would focus this general mode of engagement into a particular domain.

For example, a Critical Theory of Race in America would believe that racism is so endemic to a society and embedded within its systems to the benefit of whites that we cannot articulate a true "antiracist" vision on the terms available to us. All we could do is identify where "racism" manifests and criticize it for being there.

We call that program "Critical Race Theory" because it is a Critical Theory of Race. What it does in practice is
(1) identifies "hidden racism" in everything (criticizing those elements of the existing (racial) system they wish to change), called "identifying problematics";
(2) induces more people to think this way;
nothing else.

What a Critical America Theory would look like is not being able to articulate what a good or ideal America would look like on the terms of the existing America but criticizing those elements of America as it exists that we wish to change.

That is, it would look for everything America isn't doing perfectly according to some ideal standard that doesn't exist, probably cannot exist, and cannot even be articulated and "make those problematics visible" in the hopes of changing the system.

Leftists, including the whole of Critical Race Theory, do this endlessly. From Derrick Bell's (founder of CRT) 1970 book, Race, Racism, and American Law, forward, it is a relentless racial Critical America Theory. That's why it exported poorly and often hilariously to other countries that don't have the same law or racial history.

Howard Zinn's A People's History of the United States (1980) is another example, a very naked example, of a work of Critical America Theory. Specifically, this book goes through every chapter of American history, from pre-founding (Christopher Columbus) to the present (1980 at the time) and catalogues how America cheated "the people," mainly workers, indigenous, racial minorities, and women (the intersectional coalition).

What I'm telling you is that the blackpillers of Podcastistan and X, etc., very notably including Tucker Carlson, are doing a socially conservative variation on Critical America Theory. Whether Carlson or "Auron MacIntyre" (nhrn) from The Blaze, the undertone of every message is plainly "you don't hate your (real) country enough" as compared against an imaginary ideal that doesn't, can't, and won't ever exist.

The Blackpill Comics all do the same thing, relentlessly identifying "problematics" and alleged hidden systems of control that delegitimize the country as it actually is against a standard that isn't even real.

The thing is, Critical America Theory is a Critical Theory of America. That is, it is a Critical Theory. That is, when you participate in this slop, you are taking on a critical consciousness about America. Having a critical consciousness is being WOKE, by definition (of Woke). This slop is Woke.

When this Critical America Theory slop takes on a socially Leftist slant, we call it Woke Left (or just Woke).

When this Critical America Theory slop takes on a socially conservative or Rightist slant, we call it Woke Right (which is just Woke too).

They are both Woke. They are both toxic. They are both false enlightenment into a kind of terrible darkness, entitlement, malice, despair, hatred, and failure.

Reject Critical America Theory. Love your country. It's great, and it's worth it.

[Gene Steratore @GeneSteratore]

Having reffed both sports at a very high level, I can tell you that the atmosphere in basketball and dealing with coaches is very different.

It’s all game long, a constant back and forth, and there is a mutual understanding between basketball refs and coaches. It’s part of what makes reffing it so much fun.

I’m happy that Roger Ayers (who always referees games at a Final Four level) handled the end of the game the way that he did.

This was not a confrontational situation. Uconn hit a buzzer beater a few seconds before the viral moment between Ayers and Hurley.

Ayers is telling Hurley that the game isn’t over yet (there was a clock adjustment from 0.02 to 0.04 - which is notable for catch and shoot). Hurley isn’t physically contacting him, he’s just between Ayers and the scorer’s table.

I’ve been in some wild environments/end of game scenarios both in basketball and football. They feel surreal and you are in a state of shock to an extent.

This is how great officials handle these situations, so kudos to Roger Ayers and congrats to UConn.

[Gummi @gummibear737]

Iran was trying to use the North Korean model to get a nuke: create sufficient conventional deterrence so you won’t be challenged in acquiring one (it’s called the Seoul Hostage Problem).

This has been explained over and over since day one.

Everyone claiming shifting goalposts or no imminent threat has been lying.

The reason North Korea was allowed to get nukes is because Seoul (and its 10 million inhabitants) is within artillery and rocket range of North Korea.

During the 1994 nuclear crisis, the Clinton administration seriously considered airstrikes on North Korea’s Yongbyon reactor but backed off precisely because of the artillery threat to Seoul.

Iran was trying to accomplish the same by stockpiling missiles and drones which would have had the same deterrent effect. The proof is what Iran has been doing in the past month: attacking all its neighbors in order to pressure the US to stop attacking it

Beyond this, they were building medium-range ballistic missiles that could reach Paris and London, meaning all of Europe could be held hostage as they built a nuclear bomb.

The reason Iran has not built a nuclear weapon until now is not because it couldn’t, but because it knew it would be attacked and denied this capability.

So by allowing them to continue developing this conventional deterrence, you would be allowing Iran to get a nuclear weapon.

And unlike North Korea, Iran is led by an eschatological death cult

Reagan saw nuclear mutually assured destruction (MAD) as both morally bankrupt (because of the innocent-body-count problem) and dangerously fragile because it assumed flawless rationality between adversaries…this means it only takes one irrational actor to destroy the world.

Working backwards from the conclusion that Iran’s Islamist regime must never have a nuclear weapon, it was necessary for the US to attack Iran to deny it the conventional capacity to hold the entire eastern hemisphere hostage.

Every European leader knows this and behind the scenes praises the US for this action. But they are cowards, held hostage by their own internal Muslim populations, and so adopt these ridiculous public positions.

This was never about Israel. And if your argument is that Iran should be allowed to get a nuclear weapon then you are a fool and a traitor to western civilization…you’re a useful idiot

[Jeremi DeHainaut @jerrydmaxlil]

@20th_Centurygal Pavement

[Jeremi DeHainaut @jerrydmaxlil]

@carlquintanilla @gtconway3d The US didn’t do this to them. They got into bed with corrupt communist regimes and murderous theocracies. How the heck can it be anyone’s fault but their own?

[Jeremi DeHainaut @jerrydmaxlil]

@TheOnlyEsta Voice of reason in a sea of frauds

[Jeremi DeHainaut @jerrydmaxlil]

@MaryLTrump I voted for @JohnFetterman and cant wait to again. Didn’t betray me. Only made me a bigger fan.