Skeiv lærer som følger HamKam og Storhamar Håndball. Eurovision-entusiast. Sett til sammen 70 sesonger Survivor og Big Brother USA. Bruker Twitter mest til FPL.
Things banned from US World Cup:
1. Fans' water bottles👇
2. The Iranian football team
3. The striker for the Swiss team
4. Walking to some stadiums
5. The spirit of football
Switch. It. Off.
Exclusive @TheAthleticFC
FIFA make last-gasp change to World Cup stadium rules: BANNING fans from bringing refillable plastic bottles, so fans must buy water in stadia
As of May, empty bottles permitted so fans could refill amid heat concerns. Not now
https://t.co/OuyjvgPoxN
@itsnotclocking@KamBigBrother Fair point. I guess if he assumed a vote at F4, there was a 75% chance someone other than Aubry won that F4 immunity, ie a 75% chance he would have been good
@ellierileyoh@survfan1@RizgodWatch You know what, you’re probably right. And then Aubry will win FMC and the whole game to underly the absolute stupidity of J and J taking eachother instead of going up against her in FMC in a serious attempt at getting her out and keeping Rizo in
@RizgodWatch At least now he has arguments to make at FTC. His game is being seriously undervalued by the other players because he’s young and a newbie. Although next to Cirie what would he even say? Given he didn’t even win any immunities himself
@RizgodWatch Exactly. Were people expecting him to just give up and decide who else should win? He’s still a player in the game even if he has extremely slim chances of winning.
@survfan1@RizgodWatch He’s getting to F3 regardless. He’s a dream to sit next to with this jury, would be a moronic move to take him out at 4. I love Cirie and was rooting for her, but keeping her in would have ran the risk of immediate loss had she pulled off one of two miracles in immunity/fire
@TheBigBroTea@Hawtproper Aubry has literally had confessionals about her wanting to sit next to Rizo. I’d assume Jonathan sees the same thing. Joe and Rizo has a bond. I’d be shocked if he wasn’t the one taken to F3 by whoever wins final immunity tbh
Premier League fans deliver damning verdict on VAR. 75% of 7,946 fans polled by the Football Supporters’ Association “didn’t support the use of VAR”. Too long, too forensic, too much of a joy killer, fans say. Findings shared with Premier League and PGMO.
92% of fans surveyed “agreed” that “VAR has removed the spontaneous joy of goal celebrations” (82% of them “strongly agreed”).
85% of match-going fans “strongly disagreed” with the notion that “VAR makes watching football more enjoyable”. And 83% of those watching on TV.
85% of match-going fans “strongly disagreed” that “VAR decisions are generally resolved in a reasonable amount of time”. Echoed by 83% of those watching on TV.
Only 18% agreed that “VAR has improved the overall accuracy of refereeing decisions”.
72% are “concerned about the expansion of VAR beyond its current remit”.
79% “strongly disagreed” with the suggestion “that the match-going experience is better with VAR”.
67% “strongly agreed” that they preferred “watching games that are played without VAR to games with VAR”.
84% “strongly support” goal-line technology.
34% “strongly opposed” to the idea of a challenge system (two per game per team).
“These findings back up the FSA's previous survey in 2021, where fans expressed misgivings about the introduction of VAR,” says Thomas Concannon, @WeAreTheFSAPremier League network manager.
“The vast majority are reporting the same concerns five years on - the loss of spontaneity when celebrating goals, and an overall worsening of the match-going experience. We have shared the survey results with the Premier League and PGMO, and look forward to discussing its findings with them.” Fans surveyed of all PL clubs and all ages (Under-18 to 65+).