Using governmental power to compel equal outcomes is as far from God’s plan as you could get
The law of consecration will be completely voluntary and run by the only perfect man to walk the earth
And if this seems like a subtweet, that’s only because it is
@cdshaw99@disneycaroline ... especially since most of these are drastically reduced by proper habits (not cancer, I’ll give you that-I need to research)
BUT avoiding these anecdotal downsides is no reason for giving up the protective, sensory and lubricant properties of the unaltered male anatomy 3/3
@cdshaw99@disneycaroline I think I see how you could have that view.
If you define “healthy” as a set of physiological conditions that statistically lead to the least amount of health complications under any and ALL habits/ routines (including poverty and neglect) then you’re right. no skin no risk
1/3
@cdshaw99@disneycaroline However,
Assuming that “healthy” means optimal first-world cleanliness (and in my theist perspective: intended function), one should be very careful not to mistake the many variations in TYPES of possible hygienic issues as a high likelihood for one to happen...
2/3
@cdshaw99@disneycaroline Medically speaking it is definitely not healthier.
Unless you mean that it allows boys to go 2 weeks unbathed without concequece, circumcision is purely cultural (ancient).
The foreskin is neurologically analogous to the clitoral surface