@Havochl_ I believe he just thought that hype deserves a short squeeze of epic proportions and since there were no takers he said fine I'll just do it myself
Chad
@0xQuit It's not possible that he didn't consider where the additional interest owned will come from, right?
I do think 13% on a maxed out pool is low but 50%, damn
@0xyanshu@0xQuit The hope is that a hack like that (reverted or not) motivates for a deep self-reflection on opsec practices and improvements
In reality, it probably means we will always need failsafes like that, and an "intervention threshold" should be clearly defined
@0xQuit This whole "code is law" was a good catchphrase but people take it too literally
I always thought of it as "programmed human wellbeing" - and since code can have flaws, we need failsafes until we fix all of them
Code has an external purpose, it's not self-referential
X will replace the water gun emoji with a real pistol and use a sharp knife emoji because freedom of speech
But then it will limit your post's visibility if you use them
Amazing work, carry on
@gainzy222 It's all a part of the "oh I'm just a silly china man who doesn't know much" act
It enforces the idea that cz is clueless so nobody suspects any malicious actions from him
"I just hodl and buidl, rusty with this twitter thing" πͺ