@cravinriver@ShaneNYC212@yoshithepatriot I am sorry do you read your own posts?
“Whether it be 99/100 or 95/100. The claim made by someone of 99/100 was obviously hyperbolic.”
I thought 99/100 was hyperbolic?
Whether it be obviously hyperbolic or 95/100 is that really what you said?
To what degree is it hyperbolic?
@ShaneNYC212@cravinriver@yoshithepatriot You read what he wrote?
“The larger point is that most likely a round shot at that distance is going clean through the neck. Whether it be 99/100 or 95/100. The claim made by someone of 99/100 was obviously hyperbolic.”
@cravinriver@ShaneNYC212@yoshithepatriot OHHH so now we are at “most likely” and I should just take your word for it that it is 95-99% which isn’t 99.9%… don’t think for a second that I missed you dropping a zero and a nine.
Or I could take google’s AI power of 15-25% of men’s necks or 85-95% of all humans.
@cravinriver@ShaneNYC212@yoshithepatriot Well you claimed 999/1000 times they would go clean through the neck… so either this is the 1/1000 where it didn’t OR THE WAY MORE LIKELY you don’t believe it was a 30-06 round that killed him.
Of course both the prompts blew out of the water the 999/1000.
@cravinriver@ShaneNYC212@yoshithepatriot So you are bad faith, gotcha. I will go with the updated figure i posted when i swapped the prompt to man’s neck. 15-25%
@cravinriver@ShaneNYC212@yoshithepatriot I could slightly alter the prompt, keep everything the same but remove “human” and replace with “man’s” (eliminating women and children) and look what I get.
@ShaneNYC212@cravinriver@yoshithepatriot You are watching the video of a Fing 50 cal shot at what amounts to point blank range and comparing that to a 150gr round at 150 yards?? Seriously, there is something like 7 times the amount of force in this example versus what happened to Charlie. You are a clown.