Let me be ABUNDANTLY clear:
Temporary Protected Status is just that: TEMPORARY.
Democrats tried to turn this into a defacto amnesty program. President Trump put a STOP to it.
If you are in the country without status, you are here illegally. Illegal aliens have two choices — they can either accept a $2,600 stipend and a flight home to self deport, or they will be removed.
There's been a tsunami of ingratitude from 3rd worlders who've arrived here in recent years, scamming our system and breaking laws day 1, then throwing their weight around, making demands, protesting in our streets
We've finally reached the point where a majority of Americans- the ones who actually built and sustain the greatest nation in world history- are tired of being hectored and lectured by people from shithole countries that they're owed more free stuff, have nothing to learn from our culture, and demand apologies for the 'legacy of colonialist white supremacy'
Ok, go back to Durkadurkistan, lecture us from over there. Good luck keeping power on and water clean.
Thank you for your attention in this matter.
I want to address this accusation. Rand openly acknowledged her position, and there's no hypocrisy in it.
First, the "fake name" is a myth. She used Ann O'Connor, a version of her real married name. Her husband was Frank O'Connor. There was no alias and nothing hidden. The records were public, recovered through a routine FOIA request.
Now the principle, which she stated plainly. A man forced to pay into a system has every right to reclaim what was taken from him. In fact, only the opponent of the welfare state has a clean moral right to it, because he never sanctioned the theft, while its supporters endorse the very crime.
It is not contradictory to oppose a system and still take back your own money. I oppose Social Security. I will still cash the check, because it is my money, seized from me by force, and I will never recover what I paid in.
Refusing it frees no one. It only lets the looters keep what they stole. Reclaiming what is yours is not accepting the system. It is refusing to be its victim twice.
You want him under oath? Good. Then let's start with what you said under your own byline.
You claimed Musk's DOGE cuts "possibly sentenced 4.5 million children to death." That is a charge of mass killing. And your evidence is a Lancet projection, a statistical model built on assumptions, not one counted body. You took a forecast and turned it into a body count because the target was a man you wanted to destroy.
That is the accusation you should be put under oath to defend. Name the children. Produce the deaths. You cannot, because they exist only in a spreadsheet.
Musk asked where the taxpayers' money was going, and the answer turned up a $550 million bribery scheme. You answered by inventing 4.5 million corpses.
One of you wants accountability for stolen funds. The other manufactured a massacre out of a model. Don't pretend you're the one defending the truth.
Why did Fauci's NIAID and USAID send $44 million in U.S. taxpayer funding to the Wuhan scientist studying "the risk of bat coronavirus emergence" who later became the world's first known COVID-19 case?
It's almost as if Fauci's NIAID and USAID funded the creation of COVID-19...
Source: @WhiteCoatWaste, @TheChiefNerd
California is basically pre-revolution USA. The ballot-harvesting-assisted appointments of CA political “leaders” + the extraordinary tax increases = taxation without representation.
This new tax, if signed by Newsom, will give them another $900m with which to lose/flush down the toilet/enrich themselves. This is ON TOP of the sales tax increase that mysteriously passed after “late-arriving ballots” were counted last month.
I guess those who voted for Gavin Newsom love this kind of thing.