Hulk Hogan vs Sylvano Sousa from Dec. 29, 1979! I was told this was a missing Hogan match never posted online before and people were looking for it. Finally found it!
@TheLapsedFan
https://t.co/UQN8OHZq11
🚨🎙️Wayne Rooney: “Arsenal have been robbed tonight” 🤯
Rooney 🗣️ “I’ll be completely honest, Arsenal were absolutely robbed tonight, there is no other way to put it. You look at that foul on Noni Madueke in the box; it’s a stonewall, 100% clear penalty. How the referee or VAR hasn't given that is beyond me, and it completely changes the dynamic of a Champions League final.
But for me, the moment that truly gave it away the moment you knew exactly what the referee was doing was that halftime whistle. To blow the whistle right as Arsenal are literally standing there about to take a corner? I’ve played this game a long time, and you rarely see that unless there’s a blatant bias. It was shocking, and it set the tone for everything that followed.
In the second half, it became a totally different game, and not because of the football. The referee made absolutely sure that every single 50/50 call, every little nudge, and every major decision went straight to PSG. It completely killed Arsenal’s momentum. But to be fair, I’m not even surprised. We saw the exact same story when they played Bayern Munich earlier in the tournament. The officiating was heavily skewed then, and it’s happened again on the biggest stage.
PSG might be lifting the trophy, but they cannot honestly look at themselves in the mirror and be proud of the way they’ve won this final. To win the biggest prize in club football like that? It leaves a horrible taste. Arsenal deserved so much more tonight.”
@b0uncingbabyb0y@Fabian_Manu2025@bt3 Because fouls don’t usually “cancel out,” but simultaneous offenses can result in the referee selecting the more serious offense. In this case the referee rightly judged the foul on Raya to be more egregious. Anyway we won the fuckin trophy. :)
@GigglingGanon Rights are rights. You can hate this guy but the second people like this stop their audits and agitating videos, those rights will disappear. You don’t have to like his methods, but people doing this are an integral part of ensuring those rights stay intact. Quit being cucks.
250,000+ gamers. 100+ countries. One shared passion for cricket. 🌍🏏
What started as a vision at LightFury Games from India 🇮🇳 is now turning into a global movement.
Closing soon, Get your Early Access pass here: https://t.co/pUaJWSfI1V
Today in things that make me proud to be Mayor: PS 889's ‘Hyper Pigmentation’ are officially two-time Minecraft champions at the City's Annual Video Game Festival.
Gaming is a largely male-dominated industry, but teams like Hyper Pigmentation show us it doesn't have to be.
As New York City remains a top recruiter of gaming jobs, we're also making sure the next-generation of engineers and game designers look more like our city.
@b0uncingbabyb0y@Fabian_Manu2025@bt3 And it would probably be a foul and penalty If the foul on Raya hadn’t been correctly reviewed and reversed by VAR
🚨🎙️| Ian Wright on the penalty decisions in yesterday’s Arsenal vs Atlético Madrid match, with reference to the current IFAB Laws of the Game and UEFA VAR guidelines:
🗣️ “Listen, watching this game, I have to say, this kind of refereeing and VAR chaos is ruining football. It’s becoming unwatchable.
First, Arsenal’s penalty, the one on Gyokores. By the book, it’s a foul all day. You come through the back, you don’t play the ball, you disrupt the player’s balance, that’s careless at minimum. The law is crystal clear on that. So yes, penalty. No controversy there.
Now Atlético’s handball… and this is where I have a problem. The law says if your arm makes your body unnaturally bigger, you’re taking a risk. Fine. But it also talks about context, deflections matter. The ball hits the leg first, then the arm. So now you’re telling me we ignore the deflection just because the arm is slightly away from the body? That’s a selective reading of the law. If you apply the spirit of the rule, that’s not a penalty. If you apply the strictest possible interpretation, maybe it is. But you can’t pick and choose when to be strict.
Then the second Arsenal penalty on Eberechi Eze, and this is the one that exposes everything. The referee gives it in real time, meaning he judged the contact as meaningful. The law says VAR only intervenes for a clear and obvious error. So explain to me how is that a clear and obvious error? There’s contact on the shin, the player is impeded, it’s not imaginary. At that point, VAR is re-refereeing the game, not correcting mistakes.
So what’s the pattern here? When it benefits Atlético Madrid, we go strict on the letter of the law, arm slightly out, penalty. When it benefits Arsenal, suddenly we go ultra-demanding ‘is the contact enough? let’s overanalyse it.’
That’s not consistency. That’s interpretation depending on outcome.
And this is why fans lose their heads because the same rule is being applied three different ways in the same game.
Don’t tell me about laws if you’re not going to apply them the same way every single time.”
.@RepHuffman: "They are doing this knowing full well that every single time sulfide-ore copper mining has been tried, it has polluted the surrounding environment."
"I’m standing with the millions of people who refuse to let a corrupt president sacrifice our public lands and waters to prop up polluters. America's wilderness belongs to Americans, and we’ll keep fighting.” https://t.co/yNcpy1p9SF