The problem with socialism is, you eventually run out of other people’s money. I love my dawgs, am kind to others ( mostly) despite their questionable politics!
@DaleVince I’m no lover of anything Labour do but I thought from the off that Healey seemed the best of a bad bunch The man has shown integrity as has the war hero Al Carns. All Starmer says is his 1st priority is the safety of UK. Empty words from a complete Bull💩ter
THE DOSSIER #15: Keir Rodney Starmer – The Blueprint
A Palestinian ambassador stroked your arm on live television. Nuzzled close. Whispered into your ear. The Prime Minister of the United Kingdom stood paralysed while the world watched a foreign agent handle him like a marionette.
That was not an incident. That was a portrait. The defining image of your premiership. The single frame that explained everything.
Because you have always been someone else's instrument.
Born 2 September 1962. Southwark. A toolmaker father. A nurse mother. Named after Keir Hardie because your parents wrote your career before you drew breath. Reigate Grammar. Leeds. Oxford. Harvard. LSE. The working-class costume tailored on Savile Row.
You are not a self-made man. You are a manufactured one. The Fabian Society shaped you. The Trilateral Commission claimed you that secretive CIA-linked global elite network you joined while serving in Corbyn's shadow cabinet, off-the-record, accountable to no British voter. The networks you serve have never been British. The interests you protect never were.
The Original Sin ..........
You became Director of Public Prosecutions. Five years. The power to act. The duty to act. The evidence in front of you.
You looked away.
Rochdale, 2009. The CPS dropped charges against grooming gang suspects citing "victim credibility concerns." Twelve-year-old girls. Drugged. Raped. Trafficked. The institution you led called them unreliable witnesses to their own destruction.
Jimmy Savile, same year. Case closed on your watch. "I wasn't told," you said. The Director of Public Prosecutions wasn't informed about Britain's most prolific paedophile. Either you lie or you were asleep. Both are disqualifying.
Maggie Oliver, the whistleblower, the detective who saw the bodies, named your CPS as bearing "great responsibility" for the failures. She was there. She knew. She named you.
You learned the technique that defines you in that decade: look away when looking away serves the careerist. Protect predators when prosecuting them is inconvenient. Choose institutional comfort over child safety. Every day since has been an application of that lesson.
The Pattern Becomes Policy ..........
December 2024. You appointed Peter Mandelson United States Ambassador. The official vetting warned you in writing of "general reputational risk" because of his Epstein ties. You knew Mandelson stayed at Epstein's property after Epstein served jail time for soliciting a minor for prostitution.
You read every warning. You appointed him anyway.
The man who shielded grooming gangs as DPP elevated a paedophile's friend to the highest diplomatic rank in the Atlantic alliance. This was not error. It was continuity. The same instinct, larger scale.
September 2024. Ten million pensioners stripped of winter fuel payments. Up to £300 each. You sat in Number 10 while the elderly chose between food and heat. "We are fixing the foundations," you said. "It's the right thing to do."
Then you took £100,000 from Lord Alli. Suits. Glasses. Concert tickets. A flat for your son. The Prime Minister who froze pensioners dressed in donated tailoring. "Let me be crystal clear," you said. You were never clear. You were calculated.
February 2025. Chagos. British sovereign territory surrendered to Mauritius. £100 million per year for the privilege of being humiliated. You called it international law. The British people called it treason.
March 2026. One hundred pages of files released. The New York Times, Reuters, Bloomberg, the Guardian, AP every serious newsroom on earth confirmed the receipts. You were warned. You proceeded. Mandelson now under police investigation for allegedly leaking government documents to a dead paedophile.
April 20, 2026. You stood in the Commons and admitted you "inadvertently misled Parliament." Inadvertently. The barrister who built a career on precision. The man who wrote the 900-page Human Rights Act manual word by word. "Inadvertently." The weasel grammar of a guilty man hoping no one parses the verb.
The Domestic Record ..........
You ran two-tier policing and called the people who noticed it "far-right." You arrested grandmothers for tweets while gangs raped children in plain sight. You called working-class grief "thuggery." You called legitimate fear "Islamophobia." You called concern about borders "racism."
You hiked employer National Insurance and killed fifty thousand jobs. You broke your own fiscal rules twice. Bond markets fled. Capital fled. Skilled workers fled. The economy you inherited at 1.5% growth you handed to recession.
Your children attend private school. You live in grace-and-favour residences. You holiday in donor villas. You preach sacrifice from luxury you neither earned nor declared. You are the champagne socialist made flesh and the toolmaker's son is the costume you wear to the gala.
The Verdict of Your Own Side ..........
By May 2026, one hundred Labour MPs had publicly called for your resignation. The New York Times: "viscerally disliked." The Lowy Institute: "conclusively sapped of his authority." The party you led to landslide victory writes your obituary in public, in real time, before you have left the building.
You are not betrayed by enemies. You are buried by allies. There is no clearer verdict in democratic politics.
The Blueprint ..........
You did one good thing for Britain, and you did it by accident.
You gave us the manual.
Every appointment must be reversed. Every policy must be unwound. Every institution you touched must be rebuilt. Your premiership is the instruction text for national destruction, and reading it backwards is the path home.
You are not a Prime Minister. You are a warning carved into our recent history. The cautionary tale every future leader will be measured against. The negative reference point. The example of what one man can do to a nation when he serves Davos before Doncaster, donors before pensioners, ideology before instinct.
The toolmaker's son who learned only to dismantle.
The prosecutor who protected predators.
The barrister who broke a country with words.
The Prime Minister who stood paralysed while a foreign ambassador whispered orders into his ear, and the British people understood, in a single frozen frame, exactly what had happened to their country.
We saw you, Sir Keir.
The world saw you.
History has seen you.
And history does not forgive what it has seen.
Your betrayal of Britain is now complete. Permanent exile awaits. Congratulations. You are The Dossier.
@alfie_beachlife@InTheTrenchesUK@PaulTaylorIeng When I saw this when it happened, I’ve never felt that uncomfortable in a very long time. It’s actually nauseating. What a creepy man that ambassador is. God only knows what’s going through Starmer’s mind. But at that point I knew we could never trust him.
@LeeHarris Those nice people saying oh how wonderful to see them nibbling away at the vegetation 😄clearly are not gardeners- either that or they’re very rich to be able to keep replenishing said plants over and over 🤦🏼♀️ I love seeing them too, but not in my garden!!!!
@Chotapegs@LeeHarris I’ve discovered putting ground coffee around the plants has stopped the slugs and snails this year - the local garden centre offers them for free as well if you don’t have a coffee machine, which luckily we do. Wish I’d know about them earlier.
@forever_ro68936@LeeHarris I feel your pain I don’t mind them going on most parts of our land but we’ve got a deer proof fence and gate around the main garden which stops them. However that only works when people shut the gate! Last week left open overnight = no roses the next day 😭
@TedUrchin@UKLabour Are you speaking of the man that told us all his first priority to the citizens of this country is to keep us safe- that man?
If so, he’s not doing a very good job of it is he? 🤯
@MsN_JESSE@FayeKnoozIV@columeastwood How profound this man was. But those politicians didn’t listen did they & all those poor souls that were killed or seriously maimed over the years by those he warned us about would still be here with us now, if they hadn’t been so liberal in their actions
@Keir_Starmer@kier_Starmer Wasn’t you saying only the other day and indeed multiple times in your tenure, your first job is to protect the citizens of our country?
Well, you’ve clearly failed haven’t you!
.@Keir_Starmer, your statement says you have absolutely no tolerance for abhorrent scenes of violence like this on our streets.
With respect, tolerance is not the issue. Nobody tolerates a near beheading on a residential street in Belfast. The question your statement carefully avoids is prevention. And prevention requires honesty about a pattern your government has consistently refused to name.
A man in his thirties, a Somali national, pinned a man to the ground on a residential street and stabbed him repeatedly in the face and neck. Members of the public intervened with a hurling stick. A woman required hospital treatment for the stress of witnessing it. This happened in Northern Ireland, a place that has known more than its share of violence, and even there residents said they had never seen anything like it.
Your government has presided over record small boat crossings. It has failed to proscribe the IRGC despite repeated promises. It has blocked the grooming gang inquiry for a year before being forced to concede it. It has spent £10 billion on asylum accommodation contracts. It has actively resisted measures that would have reduced the number of unvetted individuals entering and remaining in this country.
The victims of these attacks are not statistics. They are British people, going about their lives on their own streets, who were failed before the attack happened. Failed at the border. Failed by a system that prioritises the rights of those who arrive illegally over the safety of those who were already here.
Your thoughts are with the victim. So are ours. The difference is that thoughts are not policy. Thoughts do not secure borders. Thoughts do not remove individuals with no right to be here. Thoughts do not protect the next victim, whose name we do not yet know, on a street we cannot yet identify, from an attack that has not yet happened.
How many more before the thoughts become action?