@DaneMooreNBA@KyleTheige You know these numbers are squishy. Randle plays alot more with the starters,as does Gobert. Numbers can be used to manipulate as well as enlighten reality.
@BillSimmons Yeah right,Brunson is better than Gervin ๐ Your rating system is a joke,it doesn't pass the eye test. Your reputation as an analyst of basketball talent has dropped a fair deal imo.
@sage_alex I don't want the clogged lane if Gobert stays. Would be a great defense true. With the Wolves saying McDaniels is untouchable the trade is kinda a mute point anyways. Imo this coming out of Milwaukee to boost trade value. Guess we'll find out.
@sage_alex TSJ is 26 in July and has no right hand,I'm fine losing him,he ain't no Ryan Rollins. It's the Naz and McDaniels,2 firsts that make me balk.I guess I'm just averse to the risk involved with his age,calf issues and having no team to play with Giannis and Ant after the trade.
@sage_alex I thought you were referring to the McDaniels,Naz,TSJ and two firsts ask from Milwaukee. If it's some Randle/Gobert offer from the Wolves then yes it's bad offer.
@sage_alex Salary filler?Yeah right ๐ And he's not in his prime for christ sakes. He'll be 32 in dec(older big man),has had 4 calf injuries in 3 years and plays about 75 percent of the time. That deal sucks for the Wolves imo.
@squaresense@NDebo11@sam_amick@eric_nehm@TheAthletic@JonKrawczynski He's had 4 calf strains in the last 3 seasons,and is an aging big man(big red flag imo). As someone said,not counting last season,he's missed 25 percent of games the last few seasons. But have faith, Connelly hasn't met a risky trade he doesn't love.
@NDebo11@sam_amick@eric_nehm@TheAthletic@JonKrawczynski He's not in his prime by any stretch. And he's become injury prone. Milwaukee is way overvaluing his worth. Any team that offers big big for him is falling into trap. He'll be hurt halfway thru this season,bank it.