おごさん

@ji_all5

call me おごD 主にエレ片のケツビリスナー。 TBSラジオ聴き既婚初老。RNおーるごで活動していた時期もありました。ラジオ聴き。ソロキャンプに行ってコンデジで星空を撮るのが好き。趣味テレビ番組の録画（見ない）あとテントサウナやってます。

県民

Joined September 2014

1.1K Following

723 Followers

89.8K Posts

Pinned Tweet

おごさん @ji_all5

about 4 years ago

久しぶりのキャンプ

ji_all5 retweeted

むり

@murinomiyu_jp

about 23 hours ago

年上彼氏のプレゼンが草ww 確かに、彼女をロック画面にする彼氏はいても彼氏をロック画面にする彼女は見たことないかも

187

666

ji_all5 retweeted

Aisar

@aisarcore

1 day ago

A judge dropped his pants off at a dry cleaner in Washington DC. The cleaner lost them. He sued for $54 MILLION. The cleaner offered him $12,000 to settle. He said no. He lost the case, lost his job and was suspended from practicing law. – Roy Pearson was an administrative law judge in Washington DC, the kind of person who spends their days deciding whether other people's lawsuits have merit. – In May 2005 he dropped a pair of gray trousers off at Custom Cleaners, a small dry cleaning shop owned by Korean immigrants Jin and Soo Chung. – When he came back to collect them the pants were missing. The Chungs said they had found a pair they believed were his. Pearson said they were not his pants. – He demanded $1,000 for a replacement suit. The Chungs refused. – So Pearson filed a lawsuit. He initially asked for $67 MILLION. He later reduced it to a more "reasonable" $54 MILLION. – His legal argument was built around two signs in the window of the dry cleaner. "Satisfaction Guaranteed" and "Same Day Service." – Pearson argued those signs represented an unconditional unlimited promise and that any customer who was not satisfied could demand any compensation whatsoever. – The $54 MILLION broke down as follows. – $500,000 in attorney fees even though he was representing himself. – $2 MILLION for personal inconvenience and mental distress. – $90,000 to rent a car for ten years to drive to a different dry cleaner and $51.5 MILLION in additional damages on behalf of every DC resident he claimed was at risk from misleading dry cleaner signage. – On the witness stand Pearson broke down in tears. – He had to take a break from testifying because he became too emotional while questioning himself about his own emotional distress. – The Chungs made three settlement offers. $3,000 then $4,600 and then $12,000. Pearson rejected all three. – The two years of legal fees forced the Chungs to close two of their three dry cleaning shops. – Judge Judith Bartnoff ruled in favor of the Chungs. She ordered Pearson to pay their court costs of $1,000. She wrote in her ruling: "A reasonable consumer would not interpret Satisfaction Guaranteed to mean that a merchant is required to satisfy a customer's unreasonable demands." – Pearson appealed and the appeal was rejected. He appealed again and was rejected again. – He lost his judgeship in 2007. He sued for wrongful termination. He lost that too. > In 2020 the DC Court of Appeals suspended him from practicing law for 90 days. They called his damages figure "shocking" and said his litigation tactics had "crossed the boundary into abusiveness." A judge who spent his career deciding if other people's lawsuits had merit sued a dry cleaner for $54 MILLION over a pair of pants. Turned down $12,000. Lost the case. Lost his job. Lost his law license for 90 days.