Now recruiting Fall 2026 interns for our UCSD and SDSU college credit program!
Join the 23 students whoβve already built AI-native skills while exploring the dynamic world of life sciences.
Explore testimonials and past projects on our intern page and blog.
No prior experience required; just curiosity, initiative, and a strong work ethic.
Looking forward to learning with you!
https://t.co/wYtVxQj61L
@FaceTheNation@margbrennan It would have been great if @margbrennan could have handled her emotions better and had a more productive and mature discussion. I'm really interested in learning about both sides and learning.
@MarkHalperin@RandPaul is there a website that serves as a searchable evidence database for this case? or is the public tasked with pulling all the pieces together themselves?
@bradloncar@BiotechTV@NoubarAfeyan I'm still confused by leaders saying he was "thrust" into the situation. I was a lab tech at Harvard in 2001, and even then we were discussing a future pandemic. I always assumed there was a communication plan in place....
Curious how leading AI models differ beyond just benchmark scores? Check out this case study by UCSD intern Daniel David, who explored practical prompting strategies and operational insights for teams working at the intersection of science, data, and digital content.
The report also includes a clear breakdown of AI tokens, subscription tiers, capabilities, and the unique strengths of different models, helping marketers and scientific teams choose the right tool for the right task.
https://t.co/ulhzBXDsle
Is editorial content gaining momentum in life sciences?
Editorial-style content has become a major growth strategy in industries like tech/AI and finance, but in life sciences, it's often been a tougher sell.
Why? Because executives understandably want to see a clear connection between marketing investments and business outcomes. When budgets are tight, it's easier to prioritize activities with more direct attribution.
So how do you know if an editorial content strategy is right for your life science organization?
1. You have something genuinely unique to say.
Editorial content works best when you have a unique perspective, a differentiated approach, novel data, or a product that challenges conventional thinking. Simply repeating or reframing what everyone else is saying won't move the needle.
2. Timing matters.
Not every company is ready for a large editorial investment. Early-stage companies may need to focus on foundational messaging, product-market fit, and lead generation first. As organizations mature, editorial content can become a powerful way to build credibility, educate the market, and establish thought leadership.
3. Think long-term, not campaign-by-campaign.
Editorial content rarely produces overnight results. Its value compounds over time by building trust, improving discoverability, strengthening brand authority, and creating a library of content that continues to work for you long after publication.
4. Measure what matters.
Success isn't just clicks and views. Look at indicators such as share of voice, branded search growth, website engagement, media mentions, speaking opportunities, analyst interest, and sales conversations influenced by content.
The life science companies that consistently invest in educating their market often become the companies their market trusts most.
Listen more in this clip where Alison Guzzio and Elie Diner share their perspective on how editorial content is evolving in life sciences and how organizations can determine whether it's the right fit for their growth strategy.
#LifeSciences #ContentMarketing #ThoughtLeadership #BiotechMarketing #LifeScienceCommunications #EditorialContent #BrandBuilding