Jimbojines

[Jimbojines @jimbojines]

@DrewPavlou At this point, how does anyone view brownoids with anything other than contempt?

[Jimbojines @jimbojines]

@hasanthehun Unc? You’re pushing 40

[Jimbojines @jimbojines]

@SwannMarcus89 He wrote a prompt. Not insane at all.

[Jimbojines @jimbojines]

@mikkelele_ Dumb pollack

[Oz Katerji @OzKaterji]

Kyiv is being bombed more in September 2026 than at any point since the full-scale invasion began more than 4 years ago.
Have you seen that leading the news in the UK? Any front pages? No.
This is our top story every night at @TVPWorld, because Central Europe simply cares more.

[Jimbojines @jimbojines]

@DerekPederson3 @SpaghettiKozak I am a relatively normal man sexually and I do not want to fuck a fourteen year old. I think that it is extraordinarily weird and disgusting for any grown man to want to fuck a fourteen year old.

[Oz Katerji @OzKaterji]

She explicitly said she opposed sending weapons to Ukraine, and when Mehdi asked her, she did not walk that statement back and just waffled on about how she opposes Putin.

It's embarrassing watching people defend her despite everything she says & does.
https://t.co/hxWChHBfp1

[anya @anyaxmar]

shameless both of them, nothing more tiring atp than constantly trying to hide your dogshit opinions on ukraine (notice how mehdi doesn't actually push her to say yes or no on whether she supports arms being sent to ukraine) behind calling every ukraine supporter pro-netanyahu

[Oz Katerji @OzKaterji]

Mehdi doesn't push her because his goal in this interview is to launder her reputation, not to scrutinise her views.
https://t.co/N3QwsE4hni

[Right_in_the_middle @right_inthe_mid]

I’ve spent a lot of time in “male spaces.” The worst you’ll hear is a lewd comment about a woman being desirable, or a remark about an “easy” woman.

I’ve been forced to spend a lot of time in women’s spaces (by nature of being a woman) and will regularly hear open contempt for how gross, evil, unlovable, inhuman, and pathetic the average woman thinks the average man is. Or, worse, bragging about mistreating a normal, undeserving man. There is 0 recognition that this is bizarre or cruel behavior.

So, actually, the men’s “locker room” is a pale evil in comparison.

[Jimbojines @jimbojines]

@andrew_mohrman @omibaloney Yeah that’s why he campaigned strongly for Kamala Harris last election.

[Daniel Friedman @DanFriedman81]

Every time you see one of these guys unconscious on the sidewalk or building a nest out of garbage, keep in mind that he will consume four or five times the economic resources you will this year.

People think “homelessness” is a matter of housing, but every time this guy takes a ride in an ambulance, which he probably does every few weeks, it will cost the city six months of your rent.

Hundreds of thousands of tax dollars will be spent on outreach, healthcare, criminal justice response and social services and none of it will do anything.

[Olga Patlyuk 🇺🇦 @OlgaPatl]

Could you please let me know whether your news media have covered the situation in Oleshky? Have there been any mentions of Oleshky in your news reports?

[Jimbojines @jimbojines]

@AdemLuz I would rather play Cards Against Humanity with a sweet but slightly annoying girlfriend and her sweet but slightly annoying friends then hang out in the finest strip club snorting the purest cocaine with hookers who can quote Shakespeare and Joyce.

[Woofers @NotWoofers]

Another instance of the Russians specifically hunting down a civilian walking dogs in Kherson. This is something they have done repeatedly as part of a campaign of terror, which they proudly upload themselves on Telegram to mock Ukrainians and brag about their crimes.

[Vasyl Myroshnychenko @AmbVasyl]

People in Oleshky and Hola Prystan are starving

[Jimbojines @jimbojines]

@Cheesymanfredo William T. Vollmann

[Michael Weiss @michaeldweiss]

I'd encourage everyone to read the Danish military intelligence assessment in full, and not rely on excitable social media upsums.

Here is the top line: "The Danish Defence Intelligence Service (DDIS) assesses that Russia will intensify its hybrid war by carrying out more frequent attacks against the West and NATO, with greater consequences for the targeted countries than in the past. This could include destructive cyber attacks that cripple critical societal functions as well as sabotage attacks that carry a high risk of casualties."

In other words, Russia will continue doing what it's already doing (terrorist attacks against hard and soft targets, cyberoperations), only more so. This is an uncontroversial assessment across Western intelligence services, so far as I've been able to determine.

DDIS continues: "At the same time, there is a low but growing risk that Russia will launch a limited military attack against one or several NATO countries bordering Russia....Such a limited military attack could take the form of isolated strikes with long‑range weapons on infrastructure that is vital to the support to Ukraine. In this situation, Russia might then claim that the weapons only struck NATO territory because they were jammed by Ukraine. It could also be a so-called false flag operation, where Russia uses Ukrainian‑made drones to attack a NATO country."

The scenario envisaged here (a low but growing risk) is a plausibly deniable conventional attack by Russia. The objective would be twofold. First, to sow panic and confusion in the targeted country or countries, and encourage skepticism of the official government version of what just happened. "Maybe it was the Ukrainians." "Maybe it was an accident." "Maybe no attack took place and the deep state is trying to foment World War III."

Thirty seconds on this hellsite should be enough to convince you that counterfactual narratives would be easy enough to amplify, especially in countries with elections forthcoming. A "limited military attack" psychologically would just be a heightened form of "hybrid" war because it's designed to overwhelm and demoralize the population and make its think that supporting Ukraine just isn't worth it since those not at war are now liable to become collateral damage.

The second objective of such an attack would be to gauge NATO's response to it -- and this is key bit, because, as DDIS also states:

"Russia will likely carry out military attacks only if it assesses that such attacks will not result in a war by triggering a collective NATO military response. However, Russia is likely uncertain about what could trigger such a war. Consequently, there is a risk that Russia assesses that the NATO countries will not respond collectively, especially if Russia assesses that the United States cannot or will not support the European NATO countries in a potential war against Russia." (Italics added.)

You wouldn't be wrong to detect a hint of political messaging here. (All intel services deny they do any such thing but they all do.) This is Denmark, a country that just stared down a possible U.S. invasion and annexation of Greenland, which would have meant the disintegration of NATO.

Trump has spent his entire second term (and much of his first term) doubting the Inviolability of Article V. His Pentagon has given NATO allies questionnaires to fill out to prove their worthiness as allies, while it undergoes a force posture review with ominous media leaks about what Bridge Colby and his minion might do (25,000 U.S. troops withdrawn, a scuppered U.S. base in Poland, etc.)

Now comes a frenzy of intelligence reporting across Europe about a possible Russian attack on NATO, all kickstarted by a CIA briefing delivered to the Poles, Scandinavians and Balts months ago with a warning that they're probably on their own if and when such an attack happens.

Never let a good crisis go to waste... Russia isn't sure what would trigger a war with NATO, so how might NATO make it sure? A "limited military attack" can be deterred if Washington telegraphs its intent to enforce Article V in word and deed by stating clearly and repeatedly what would constitute a casus belli in 2026 and, of course, by keeping U.S. troops in Europe.

[Iryna Voichuk @IrynaVoichuk]

People are eating weeds in Oleshky because there is almost nothing else left to eat.

There is no electricity, water or gas. Some people eat once a day. Shops are closed and medicine is scarce. Leaving means facing mined roads, with no agreed humanitarian corridor.

Around 6000 people remain there. At least 200 of them are children.

[nana @erenlovings]

please, speak about oleshky. thousands of ukrainians are starving to death in russia occupied city. they haven’t received humanitarian aid since may, russia attacks vehicles that try to deliver food or evacuate civilians. the city is isolated, they don’t have food, medicine