麦克吴

心外无物

[Jay炼金师 @JayHhdmg]

卧槽，这踏马太毒了

DeepMind 掌门人、诺奖得主 Demis Hassabis 刚刚把延续了上百年的现代学校教育底裤彻底扒光了：

全球几十万名数学老师每天关在办公室里，为同一门中学数学课重复手搓着一模一样的 PPT，这简直是人类智力资源最荒诞的工业级空转。

很多人至今还把名校名师的课堂讲授当成稀缺资源，拼了命去抢学区房和重点班，

但 Hassabis 直接用最冷酷的第一性原理砸碎了这个幻觉，

标准化的知识灌输从来不配占用昂贵的线下课堂，死记硬背和刷题完全应该被踢出教室，交给能按每个孩子毫秒级反应速度实时调频的私人 AI，加上全世界最顶尖的那几个大师录好底层大课，就足以把全球基础教育的讲授环节一次性彻底平替。

过去两百年里，学校本质上是一座把千差万别的碳基大脑强行塞进同一条流水线、按同一个节拍器拧螺丝的工业时代兵营，

老师沦为了人肉复读机，学生被困在��燥的题海里比拼谁更像一台劣质硬盘，
而一旦 AI 和顶级大师把标准化的知识传递彻底接管，线下教室唯一剩下的合法存在价值，就只剩下了机器永远无法通过权重计算出来的五个维度：

人际博弈、复杂项目实战、创业野心、创造力，以及最致命的判断力。

这里有一个极度冷酷的反直觉真相：
当个性化 AI 把考高分的边际成本砸穿地板，按标准答案培养出来的做题家，在出校门的那一刻就已经直接沦为了算力废料。

未来的阶层分化，从来不再取决于谁的脑子里背下了更多现成的公式，
而是取决于当 AI 把一万种完美方案同时拍在桌上时，谁拥有拍板做决定的判断力，谁能攒起一个活人团队去把事情干成，

所以别再逼着孩子在死记硬背的泥潭里跟硅基芯片比拼记忆容量了，当流水线式的教书匠和做题家同时迎来历史性失业，谁能先把教室变成训练人性直觉与创业野心的实战沙盘，谁才能在算力时代拿到唯一不被平替的入场券

[The 48 Laws of Power @48LawsofPowerr]

You can recover from a mistake.

Recovering from a damaged reputation is much harder.

Never treat your name as something disposable.

Law 5: So Much Depends on Reputation. Guard It with Your Life.

[硅谷王川 Chuan @Svwang1]

大部分风投行业从业者外表光鲜，装逼很厉害，但实际上分钱很少，有苦说不出。比如下面这个成功的案例，即使 VC 在估值一千万美元的时候投资十万美元，即使几年后有 1700倍的回报，计入各种摊薄之后实际回报只有 250倍。 两千五百万美元的回报，分到 VC 基金的就是五百万美元，再分给底下真正干活的，还要按照实际打工时间再摊薄，再扣完税，也就只能拿到一万美元。

剩下 95%以上不成功的案例，就只能喝西北风了。但仍然要继续咬牙对外强充硬汉，继续装逼。

这个行业真正极少数赚钱的，主要还是靠把基金做大， 收管理费的创始人。

[Nassim Nicholas Taleb @nntaleb]

Let me be blunt. Those who are afraid of AI feel deep down that they are impostors & have no edge. If you have a 1) clear mind, 2) a deep, not just cosmetic, undertanding of your specialty, 3) and/or are original enough to reinvent yourself when needed, AI will be your friend.

[Morris @Morris_LT]

为什么说：赚辛苦钱的人，花钱是没有爽感的？因为他们衡量消费的单位不是金钱，而是时间、体力、压力和忍耐。一顿昂贵的饭，在他们眼里可能是几天的辛苦；一次旅行，可能意味着几个月的积蓄。每一笔支出，都能换算成自己曾经付出的代价。于是，消费带来的快乐，很容易被失去金钱的痛苦抵消。真正的问题不是钱赚得少，而是收入与个人劳动高度绑定。当财富只能依靠持续付出换取，人就很难从容地消费，因为花掉的不只是钱，还有重新赚回这笔钱所需要的生命时间。只靠出售时间赚钱的人，连享受时间都容易产生负担。

[麦克吴 @JinFengWu10]

@Morris_LT 如何卖书

[麦克吴 @JinFengWu10]

@ray2kcreations 谢谢你

[麦克吴 @JinFengWu10]

@Morris_LT 看起来你对自己的父母挺失望

[麦克吴 @JinFengWu10]

@activationfunc 是伟大的中国人民发明了这一切，不要什么都归因到一��领袖身上，个人的力量是完全无法媲美一个系统的

[麦克吴 @JinFengWu10]

@435hz 是的，塔勒布说过同样的话，交易净化了关系

[麦克吴 @JinFengWu10]

@elonmusk 你总是如此极化

[Race 🕊️ @multiplanet1]

Larry Ellison, the co founder of Oracle and one of the wealthiest people on earth, once described his friendship with Elon Musk in terms that revealed something nobody else in Elon's life has been willing to say publicly. He said Elon has almost no friends. And the few he has cannot reach him when it matters.

Ellison is one of the only billionaires who has maintained a genuine personal friendship with Elon over decades. He sits on the Tesla board. He invested early. He has described their relationship as one where he is frequently the person who calls Elon at 11pm not to discuss business but to ask if he's okay. The answer, according to Ellison, is usually some version of "I'm working." Not fine. Not good. Working.

Ellison has described the particular loneliness of being Elon's friend. The friendship is real but access is intermittent. Elon responds to texts about engineering problems within minutes. Texts about personal wellbeing can go unanswered for days. The prioritization is not conscious cruelty. It is the same architecture that every partner has described: the system processes mission critical inputs first. Personal inputs are queued.

The detail Ellison shared that cuts the deepest: he said there have been moments where he genuinely worried about Elon's mental state and could not get through. Not because Elon was ignoring him. Because Elon was in a state of focus so total that external inputs, including from the one person calling specifically to make sure he was alive, were not registering. The man who can process rocket physics and factory logistics simultaneously cannot always process a phone call from a friend who is worried about him.

Ellison is 82 years old. He has known Elon for over 20 years. He has watched every marriage end, every public crisis unfold, and every near bankruptcy threaten the empire. He remains. Not because the friendship is easy. Because the man he is friends with has almost nobody else who calls to ask if he's okay without wanting something in return.

The richest man alive has one friend who calls at 11pm to check on him. The friend is also one of the richest men alive. The friendship exists in a stratosphere where the normal support systems (family, community, coworkers who care) have been replaced by employees, investors, and partners who all need something. Ellison needs nothing from Elon. That is why the friendship works. And that is why it is almost alone.

[麦克吴 @JinFengWu10]

@___lilyvalley 记住你们的侵华战争罪行，几千万中国人死亡

[☆ @literarrium]

Nothing kills the human soul like being in the wrong place with the wrong people.

- Fyodor Dostoyevsky

[Steven Pinker @sapinker]

AI could push back against public irrationality like conspiracy theories, fake news, & medical quackery. Whereas social media optimize for sheer engagement (clicks, likes, & reposts), AI is sold as a useful product that aids decision-making in the real world. For all the problems of LLMs, they're less likely to send users down a conspiratorial rabbit hole. This may restore the influence of epistemically responsible expertise. So argues the philosopher Dan Williams @danwilliamsphil https://t.co/hv0n5EzREq

[麦克吴 @JinFengWu10]

@paulg 你要这么说，中国历史上全是独裁统治，你对中国一无所知，全是西方价值观

[Anish Acharya @illscience]

One of the concepts I’ve been thinking a lot about lately is that AI dramatically changes the supply-side economics of creating content, software, games, etc., but doesn’t necessarily change consumer demand.

Consumers have always been interested in sex, money, and status at a base level. Perhaps a more generous view is self-expression, community, and experiences that move them forward on their personal hero’s journey.

I think a real challenge for consumer founders is connecting these supply-side miracles to latent consumer demand.

True customer empathy is very rare, and so much of software is an act of self-expression rather than an act of creating utility or joy for the customer. Founders love the software they make because it tells their story, but customers are interested in their own stories.