@Mattsav16882679@CsTominaga LOL, even though the individuals sending the data clearly indicated they were conducting a test, CSW still had no shame in lying.
@CsTominaga@369bsv BSV fell from $500 to $30, and lost 50% of the subsidy due to the halving, so BSV miners lost 99.8% of their income. So do you think BSV collapsed? Lol.
@369bsv@CsTominaga If the subsidy suddenly becomes zero, BTC will continue to survive and BSV will die. This is the reality. So what you should worry about is how to increase the use of BSV, rather than fantasizing about BTC dying. Because it is your BSV that is really facing the threat of death.
@CsTominaga@369bsv LOL, no one stipulates that BTC must maintain the current computing power. The decline in revenue will cause some computing power to leave, so what? If you are not a miner, why do you care about these?
@369bsv@CsTominaga Usage is not going to magically appear, especially if you continue to make up lies and attack everyone in order to support a scammer. People will just get sick of you lunatics and stay away from BSV.
@369bsv@CsTominaga TPS is not money, you can claim you support 1 trillion TPS, but if no one uses it then it is 0. Anyway BTC does have $200,000 in fees per day, which is enough to support the operation of the nodes, so why should they worry? But your BSV only earns $1 in fees per day.
@369bsv@CsTominaga You really don't understand. Assuming that the current subsidy for miners is zero and they only rely on transaction fees to survive, then BTC miners can have $200,000 in transaction fees per day, while BSV will only have one dollar.
@369bsv@CsTominaga The real future is that no one will use BSV. After losing all subsidies, BSV miners will only receive less than $1 in fees per day. BTC can receive $200,000 in fees per day, which is enough to keep the network running.
@369bsv@CsTominaga Although you don’t understand how miners work, you should at least think about this question: why Kurt, who once boasted that he “only mines BSV”, transfer his computing power from “more profitable BSV” to BTC.
@369bsv@CsTominaga You don’t seem to know that BSV is also halving again and again, and the plan you expect of “replacing block subsidies with transaction fee income” has not appeared in BSV. Obviously, BSV will die sooner anyway. BTC can adjust its plan to adapt to changes at any time.
@PhotoKuro_@CsTominaga CSW is just trying to act like a great builder and attract followers by belittling others. The reality is he is the one who has not built anything and has been making up lies his whole life.
@369bsv@CsTominaga Didn't Craig tell you that there is no 51% attack? Because miners will not break the law. Lol.
You don't need to worry about 51% attack because it will only attack large transactions. And you can avoid losses in many ways, such as increasing the number of confirmations, KYC.
@tradastraya@CsTominaga@MichaelBulmer20@nondualrandy@grok All products built on BSV died, and it was obviously not the fault of the builders. These builders built many successful products after leaving BSV. The reason for BSV's death was CSW's lies and malicious lawsuits. This made users hate BSV and refuse to use BSV-related products.
@CsTominaga@nondualrandy@MichaelBulmer20@grok It's ironic that an old man who started dozens of companies in his lifetime without building any valuable business, just one scam after another, is now trying to teach some successful entrepreneurs how to build a successful product.
@CsTominaga LOL, guess when Craig will start insulting Jimmy and Calvin. Craig actually hates these idiots who lick his ass every day. But he won't show it until those people stop indulging in his lies.
@369bsv@CsTominaga No, even if the block subsidy is reduced to 0, BTC can maintain a hashrate that exceeds BSV just by relying on the current fee income. The remaining miners can continue to make money. If BSV is not worried about hashrate now, why should BTC worry?