@mar67268@LuisOrozco09 See, the thing is what you want actually sucks and is uninspired. It’s a stupid idea that’s been done before. And, if the replies are any indication, that makes total sense given who you are (nobody)
It’s a small world in NYC politics as reporters run into Curtis Sliwa in Midtown after mayor’s presser. He’s asked many including what he thinks about the campaign to stop Mamdani from attending the 9/11 ceremony. “Ridiculous,” he said. “He’s the mayor. Stop being sore losers.”
@wodunit It’s weird that I’ve got to give you a break for checking my pfp for something to use before arguing—even weirder that my handsome visage stuck with you enough to become part of your “engagement.”
But if I must - I’d say this about covers the gap:
https://t.co/mixjm6B24l
@wodunit For clarity - zero interest in arguing with you, some rando. Just here to signpost to everyone who else sees this stupid tweet that the moron who drafted it doesn’t know what they are talking about.
Also
“Are you blind?!?!” Into “I don’t see how this looks…” true combo. Lmao
You are incorrect.
There's no connection between sexuality and gender identity. A man can be gay, straight, bisexual, or otherwise, and identify as masculine, feminine, or neither.
If you wanted artistic depictions of "robust masculinity," as you say, you can always go back to J. C. Leyendecker, a German-American immigrant responsible for producing some of the best commercial art during the early 20th century. Leyendecker, who is widely believed to be gay, created "The Arrow Man" for Arrow Shirts and hundreds of The Saturday Evening Post's covers. If you're into menswear, as I am, you are undoubtedly familiar with his work, as he created much of the menswear art during that period. "Trad" corners of Twitter also often put his art forward today as representations of "traditional Western society."
Or you can check out Osmar Schindler, whose works are markedly homoerotic. See Muskelspiel (Muscle Play, 1907) and Germanic Warrior with Roman Helmet (1902), pictured in the second and third slides below. These images celebrate "robust masculinity," but there are often layers of meaning, which makes his work interesting.
What you're hinting at is a stereotype that has always been around but, in my opinion, crystallized after the trial of Oscar Wilde. In his essay "Out of the Closet," Max Mosher writes about some of this history. An excerpt:
“Pansy, Nellie, swish, queen: the fairy went by many names, but one thing universally acknowledged was that he wasn’t a ‘real man.' Sexual theories of the time suggested that homosexuals were women in men’s bodies, unnaturally devoid of masculinity. But the easily recognizable identity proved useful for lonely men desperate to find each other. Gay men flocked to the stereotype like fairies to a flame. [Later], masculine gays felt alienated from an identity that didn’t represent them; early queer activists worried that the fairy stereotype gave the community a bad name.”
In the 1970s, gay men rejected this "fairy" stereotype and embraced over-the-top representations of masculinity, often forms connected to the working-class male. In San Francisco, some of these men were known as "The Clones" or "The Castroids" (for how they would hang around Castro Street, a historically LGBTQ+ area of the city).
Moser continues: “Clones had taken the look of the working-class male and sexualized it, emphasizing muscles through tight t-shirts, and shapely buttocks through deliberately shrunken jeans. The Clone Look was, in fact, a deconstruction of the traditional male, a kind of ‘butch drag.’ By dressing like ‘real men,’ clones had discovered that masculinity was a performance with costumes no less contrived than the fairy’s tailored suits or the radical drag queens’ gowns. The Clone Look, the first style to say it was okay to be both gay and masculine, may have encouraged thousands of men to come out.”
Today, much of this aesthetic has been co-opted by the far right, as conservatives wear skin-tight Buffalo plaid shirts, stretch denim, and work boots.
Regardless, I don't care for the original image not because it depicts masculinity — which I'm totally fine with and in fact have built a career in writing about as an aesthetic — but because it's cliché.
To be sure, it's remarkable as photojournalism, as it captures the moment when Secret Service agents rushed Reagan out of the Augusta National Golf Club when someone crashed the gate and took people hostage in 1983.
But people are not necessarily reacting to that moment; they are reacting to the semiotics of the image. I find the image cliché because it's so inert and overdetermined. There are no layers to the image; people are just into the accumulation of masculine tropes in a small frame — preppy clothes (symbolizing wealth), semi-automatic weapons (violence), and a sense of urgency (ACTION!!). I find it cliché the same way I find it cliché when a certain kind of guy loves referencing the Scarface scene where Tony Montana says "say hello to my little friend." The red-carpeted mansion (wealth), shootout with semi-automatic weapons (violence), and fast-paced scene (ACTION!!) have some obvious appeal. But... it's also pretty cliché.
You are easily impressed by low quality symbols, which is perhaps why our current political moment is so exciting for you.
@AuthenticoLucha@bjorkingmypean@westcoastwinter No, it wasn’t particularly odd. Most non-twitter fried people understood it as a simple “wild this exists - what’s the rules on making a biopic about a guy.” Ur just a frustrated guy it seems lmao
@laserlazuli I might be speaking out of school here, but I felt the couple who died were - far and away - the most likable and morally righteous characters in the movie. Their deaths served to highlight how corrupt Gladys was and create payoff. But they were no less real or well rounded.
you’ll be shocked to learn Flock’s biggest investor is Andreessen Horowitz who is also an early seed investor in Free Press (both in 2021) which is oddly not disclosed in this segment
EA - I have a crisp one hundred dollar bill right here in my hand. put the Dead Space IP in the other and you walk away with raw profit. one benjamin. that's cash, baby
@_Hero_Hei_ It’s so funny that half of you guys—this specific brand of whiny demanding anti-art chud—are Vtubers. You can’t even attach your face to the what you’re pushing because you are either:
a) too pussy/insecure
b) grifting and cant stand behind it
c) are that sincerely lame