YUICHI🛸

[YUICHI🛸 @jjkkigg]

@mikechow4 This will create a reason to invest in IOTA, and there is a possibility that it will become a major player in the field.

[YUICHI🛸 @jjkkigg]

@mikechow4 Now that this goal has been achieved, the trade infrastructure can begin.

IOTA will demonstrate real-world use cases that have not been shown in the coin market before, and once that happens, a new narrative will be established.

[YUICHI🛸 @jjkkigg]

@mikechow4 While IOTA has undergone a long period of trial and error to resolve its technical debt, leading to the perception that Codiside was its ultimate goal, its true objective was to secure technology that is fully usable in the real world.

[YUICHI🛸 @jjkkigg]

@mikechow4 However, the most critical process for IOTA at present is establishing a narrative.

[YUICHI🛸 @jjkkigg]

@mikechow4 A fact many investors overlook is that, in addition to burning, storage deposits must be locked up for each object during tokenization.

This occurs when tokenizing various documents, and since they must be stored for several years, it has a long-term lock-up effect.

[YUICHI🛸 @jjkkigg]

@mikechow4 In reality, simply maintaining close to 1800 TPS can lead to near-deflation through burning.

However, more IOTA can be used.

[YUICHI🛸 @jjkkigg]

@mikechow4 Because IOTA is designed based on real-world demand and developed in collaboration with governments and institutions, it can be easily adopted into the real world.

[YUICHI🛸 @jjkkigg]

@mikechow4 The lower the gas fees, the greater the difference in added value.

Consequently, as the number of transaction executions increases infinitely, the revenue from added value grows even larger.

[YUICHI🛸 @jjkkigg]

@mikechow4 The scale of global trade transactions is enormous, a completely different dimension from retail transactions.

In fact, IOTA developed Starfish to support these large-scale transactions, and thanks to its low gas fee model, large-scale real-world use is possible.

[YUICHI🛸 @jjkkigg]

@mikechow4 While it is true that lower token prices allow for higher fees, this applies equally to Ethereum gas fees.

However, if the actual added value outweighs the gas fees, paying the fees is advantageous.

[YUICHI🛸 @jjkkigg]

@mikechow4 In other words, retail IOTA investors effectively generate profits through a structure in which they receive funds from the trade infrastructure.

This is sustainable and can grow in scale over time.

[YUICHI🛸 @jjkkigg]

@mikechow4 This phenomenon of actual demand represents a demand to purchase IOTA using the trade infrastructure budget, which is to burn and eliminate all of it without the need to sell it again.

[YUICHI🛸 @jjkkigg]

@mikechow4 Furthermore, because the added value of trade infrastructure is very high, their profits are greater even if the price of IOTA rises.

In addition, they can hedge gas fees through staking rewards by investing directly in IOTA.

[YUICHI🛸 @jjkkigg]

@Tattvamasi68 @IOTA_Deutsch The actual users of IOTA are not crypto retailers.

The actual users are governments, enterprises, and agencies.

When they are ready to use it on a large scale, network traffic could increase suddenly.

[YUICHI🛸 @jjkkigg]

@iotacreamies 1 more plz

[YUICHI🛸 @jjkkigg]

@X_DigiEmpire @nineB_insight 양자컴퓨터는 80년대에 논의되고 90년대말에 최초로 기초적인 개념이 구현되었습니다.
당시 비트코인 설계하면서 양자컴에의한 보안문제는 충분히 예상가능합니다.

저는 그것보다 반감기로 채굴자들 보상문제로인한 보안문제가 더 일찍 일어날거 같네요.

[YUICHI🛸 @jjkkigg]

@YounghoYh_PARK 은행들은 리플넷을 사용하지만 XRP는 사용하지 않습니다.

[YUICHI🛸 @jjkkigg]

@User1984Tangle @cb_becl1 @cryptobobberx @HankMoody089 Twin