공유하고 싶은 내용이 있어 요약 전달합니다.
"가장 취약한 이들이, 가장 큰 위험에 노출되었습니다."
지난 6월 24일 베네수엘라를 강타한 규모 7.2·7.5의 연쇄 지진으로 현재까지 확인된 사망자만 1,900여 명, 부상자 15,000여 명, 40,000여 명이 실종되었습니다.
뉴진스는 배임 누명으로 MHJ이 24년 8월에 기습 해임된 후, 표준 계약서에 따른 시정 요구를 24년 9월/11월 2회나 했으나 시정이 되질 않아 계약서에 따라 해지함. 그렇게 나간 멤버에게 협박한 것
<“동의하지 않으면 불법체류가 될 수 있다”는 취지의 이메일까지 보내며 당사자와 그 부모를 압박함>
📢 오늘의 형사고발과 별개로, 저는 국민신문고를 통해 어도어가 하니의 비자정보가 기사로 유출되었음을 인식하고도 후속조치를 미이행한 것을 비롯한 개인정보 보호법 위반 정황 및 의혹과 관련하여 개인정보보호위원회에게 행정조사 실시 및 과징금과 과태료 부과를 촉구하는 민원을 제기하였습니다
정회일 판사님, 지금 삶이 즐거우시죠? 근데 뉴진스 다섯 소녀들의 삶은 당신으로 인해 어떻게 됐는지 똑똑히 보시고 평생 참회하시길 바라는 충고를 드립니다. 앞으로 판결을 하실 땐 전관의 영향으로 편파적이지 않는다면 잘 모르면 공부좀 하시고 판결하고 아니면 님으로 인한 피해자 그만 만드세요
걍 막연한 생각들
어도어가 주장하는 해지 사유들이 ㄴㅈㅅ 모두가 함께 한 행동이라면, 같은 사유가 네명에겐 신뢰관계파탄이 아닌데 한명에겐 파탄이라고 할 합리적인 이유가 없다 생각함. 결과적으로 어도어 진술의 일관성과 신빙성을 약화함. 어도어는 그 이유가 ㄷㄴㅇ만 복귀과정에 비협조적이었다고 주장하지만 ㄷㄴㅇ측 변론이 사실이라면 애초에 그들은 동일한 기회를 주지 않았을 확률이 높음. 그렇다면 ㄷㄴㅇ만 협조적이지 않았다는 주장은 힘을 잃음.
또한 전소송 중 이미 알던 내용들인 경우, 만약 그것들이 진짜 위반행위였다면, 원고인 어도어는 얼마든지 유효소송을 다니엘에게만 취하할 수 있었고 가처분이 있었기에 집행을 할수도 있었는데 아무 조치도 취하지 않았고 끝까지 유효판결을 받아냈고 심지어 판결 선고날에도 돌아오라고 메시지 보냄. 이 부분 역시 어도어 진술의 일관성과 신빙성을 약화할 수 있다고 봄.
Press Conference on Filing a Criminal Complaint Against ADOR for Alleged Leakage of NewJeans Member Hanni's Personal Information
https://t.co/cVfcHbVGr4
- Kim Sung-soo, Cultural Critic
- Attorney Park Kang-hoon
To the respected people of Korea, and to the members of the press gathered here today,
We stand before you today with heavy hearts, but with an unwavering determination that we cannot and will not back down. Today, we are submitting a criminal complaint against ADOR Co., Ltd. and its executives and employees for alleged violations of the Personal Information Protection Act.
There was a young woman. An artist in her early twenties who came to a foreign country out of her love for Korean popular culture and, through nothing but her sincerity on stage, comforted the hearts of countless people. For her, a residency visa was not just a piece of paperwork, it was a lifeline that sustained her life in this country.
Yet that lifeline, her most sensitive and vulnerable personal information, was ruthlessly cast before the public by the very agency that was supposed to protect her.
The expiration date of a foreign resident's visa and the progress of any extension application are information known only to the immigration authorities, the individual concerned, and the agency handling the matter on the individual's behalf. Not even journalists could obtain access to such highly confidential internal information through ordinary reporting. So how could this top-secret information have found its way into the public domain behind the anonymous curtain of "multiple music industry officials"?
For a young woman in her twenties who came from another country, her agency was not merely a company. It should have been her only guardian in place of the parents who were far away, and the strongest shelter protecting her from the storms of the world. Instead, that very shelter invited the wolves inside, exposing her most vulnerable point to be torn apart.
Faced with this cruel betrayal, the agency stabbing an artist in the back after she entrusted them with her youth, we cannot help but ask, as fellow human beings:
What, exactly, was worth protecting that justified going this far?
This was not a simple case of negligence in which information accidentally leaked due to poor management. It was a deliberate and malicious act of exploiting an artist's greatest vulnerability to gain an advantage in a private legal dispute.
As the conflict over the exclusive contract intensified, visa-related information was leaked to the media in an attempt to neutralize the artist's position by creating the narrative that she was an "illegal immigrant."
The consequences were devastating.
Despite the fact that her visa remained valid, distorted reports flooded the media describing her as "currently an illegal immigrant." Dozens of articles even included the phrase "illegal immigrant" directly in their headlines. Eventually, reports were even filed with the authorities accusing her of being an illegal resident.
Can you imagine the overwhelming fear a young woman in her twenties must have felt when she woke up one morning in a foreign country to find the horrifying scarlet letter of "illegal immigrant" branded before her name?
A visa is not merely an administrative document. It is like an oxygen supply that allows someone to breathe, to step onto the stage they love and to meet the people who cherish them.
Yet the agency seized control of that oxygen line, even sending emails to the artist and her parents conveying the message that "if you do not consent, you could become an illegal resident," thereby placing them under pressure.
And what must her parents have felt, having sent their precious child alone to a distant foreign land?
They could do nothing but helplessly watch from across the sea as the dream their child had built through tireless effort, and, more importantly, their child's dignity, was stripped bare and torn apart.
Unable to bear the pain in her place or even rush to embrace her, they expressed their anguish through tears, stating:
"Speculative reports are even being published about the type of visa and its expiration date , personal information that there is no obligation to disclose, causing severe violations of our rights and interests."
The purpose of the Personal Information Protection Act is to protect individuals' freedoms and rights and to uphold their dignity and value.
An individual's right to informational self-determination, the right to pursue happiness guaranteed under Article 10 of the Constitution, and the right to privacy guaranteed under Article 17 are fundamental rights that no one has the authority to trample upon.
The foundation of the entertainment industry is trust between artists and the public. If the personal information of artists, who deserve the highest level of protection, can instead be turned into a weapon in a dispute, then this goes far beyond a private conflict between one agency and one artist. It gravely undermines trust in the healthy ecosystem of the entire popular culture and arts industry.
Those who actually carried out the information leak remain hidden behind the anonymous label of "multiple music industry officials." Their identities cannot easily be uncovered through ordinary administrative investigations or voluntary inquiries alone. Only compulsory investigative measures, such as searches and seizures and the examination of communications records, can clearly establish the source of the personal information leak, the route by which it spread, and the individuals responsible.
Accordingly, we earnestly request that the investigative authorities:
First, thoroughly determine the source and transmission route through which the personal information was provided to the media.
Second, identify the individuals responsible who remain hidden behind this veil of anonymity.
Third, hold the corporation accountable for its management and supervisory responsibilities so that personal information is never again weaponized as a tool in private disputes.
To the respected people of Korea,
The dream that a young woman carried to a foreign land must never be crushed in this way.
This is not merely the story of one idol standing beneath bright stage lights. It is the story of every young person in our time who devotes everything they have in pursuit of a better tomorrow. It is also the story of someone's beloved daughter.
If corporations wielding enormous capital and power are permitted to exploit an individual's vulnerabilities and trample upon their dignity, then there will be no young person left in our society who can safely dream without fear.
This criminal complaint is not simply about restoring one individual's reputation. It is about protecting the dignity and rights of everyone striving to pursue their dreams in this country.
We sincerely ask for the continued attention and support of the public and the media so that the truth may be revealed and justice may prevail.
Thank you.
대중문화산업법은 소속사가 업무상 알게된 비밀을 누설하는 경우에 1천만원 이하의 과태료를 부과하도록 규정하고 있습니다.
1달 전에 문체부에 하니의 비자정보 유출과 관련해서 행정조사 실시와 과태료 부과를 요청하는 민원을 제기했고, 법 위반이 확인될 시 조치를 취하겠다는 답변을 받았습니다.
말 너무 잘해서 탄산수 존나 마신 느낌
https://t.co/mixB7lqWcY
저들은 나와 민희진이 문화예술계 기득권 카르텔이고, 이 카르텔이 서로를 지키기 위해서 죄 없고 순진한 하이브라는 대기업을 괴롭히고 있다고 생각하더라고. 여기서 그냥 이해를 포기했지 뭐.
(..)
요즘 아무때나 기득권 딱지 붙여서 제 무지와 무능을 정당화하는 게 유행인가?
(..)
뉴진스 이야기하는데, 왜 ㅇㅇㄹ 때는 가만히 있었냐? ㅇㅇㄹ 때는 또 뭐고? 암튼 자꾸 선택적 흐린 눈이 어쩌고 하는데 당연하지, 엠병. 내가 관심 갖고 옳은 거에 내 목소리를 내지, 세상만사 모든 일에 내 목소리를 내면 나는 그냥 인간 재난문자지.
“ADOR Suspected of Leaking NewJeans Hanni’s Visa Information”… Cultural Critic Files Police Complaint
https://t.co/emPthJsNHS
Reporter Lee Jeong-guk
- Cultural critic Kim Seong-su files criminal complaint with Seoul Yongsan Police Station
ADOR, the agency of NewJeans, who recently celebrated their 4th debut anniversary, has been criminally reported on allegations of leaking visa-related personal information belonging to member Hanni, an Australian national.
Cultural critic Kim Seong-su held a press conference in front of Seoul Yongsan Police Station on the morning of the 28th and announced that he had filed a criminal complaint against ADOR and its employees for alleged violations of the Personal Information Protection Act.
Kim alleged that ADOR and the employees responsible for handling Hanni’s immigration status had unlawfully disclosed personal information obtained through their duties, leaked it without authorization, and provided it to third parties for purposes beyond those for which it had originally been collected.
According to the complaint, ADOR obtained and processed information during the course of managing Hanni’s activities and immigration status, including the type of her E-6 (Arts and Entertainment) visa, its expiration date, the progress of her visa extension application documents, and whether she had signed them. Kim claims that this information was publicly disclosed through media reports citing “multiple music industry officials” between December 2024 and February 2025.
In particular, Kim argues that details reported on February 11 of last year—including the preparation of Hanni’s visa extension documents and whether she had refused to sign them—were information that would have been difficult for anyone other than Hanni herself and agency personnel directly involved in handling the matter to know. Kim urged investigative authorities to identify the actual source of the information and determine how it was passed to the media.
The complaint also includes as evidence a statement released by the parents of the NewJeans members on February 12 of last year. At the time, the parents stated that approximately 70 speculative news articles had been published over two days discussing Hanni’s visa type and expiration date, and they expressed concern that her personal information and rights had been violated.
In February of last year, several entertainment media outlets reported that if Hanni left ADOR, she would no longer have a sponsoring agency, meaning she would no longer meet the requirements for an E-6 (Arts and Entertainment) visa and could become an undocumented resident. Following those reports, some anti-fans even went so far as to report Hanni to the Ministry of Justice as an undocumented immigrant.
오늘 버니즈들을 대신해서 어도어와 성명불상의 개인정보 유출자를 고발하러 용산경찰서로 갑니다. 오전 10시 짧게 기자회견문 낭독과 고발장 제출을 할 예정이고 곧바로 간단한 기자간담회를 인근 카페에서 할 예정입니다. 민감함 개인정보를 유출해서 아티스트를 좌표찍는 행위는 사이버불링입니다
@트친 누나들
저희 아버지가 췌장암에 걸리셨는데요..
최근 미국에서 효과 좋은 신약이 나왔는데, 아직 한국에 안 들어와서 못 쓰는 상황이에요.
한국 빨리 들어오게 해달라는 국민 청원인데, 동의 해주시길...
주변에 퍼트려주시면 감사하겠슴다🙏🙏
오류로재업
https://t.co/5ERupRGuIJ
여성 80여 명을 성희롱한 단톡방을 알렸습니다.
가해자에게 검찰이 구형한 벌금은 30만 원
피해자인 제가 선고받은 벌금은 300만 원
혼자 감당하기 어려워 모금을 시작합니다. 이 모금이 피해자가 혼자 남지 않는다는 연대를 보여주고, 뒤에 올 피해자들의 말하기를 응원하는 계기가 되기를 바랍니다