Tu vēl neesi izlēmis, par ko balsot?
Es apkopoju deputātu deklarācijas un publiskos datus vienā vietā.
Lai tu varētu izdarīt informētu izvēli.
Izmeklē un dalies ar interesantiem atradumiem → https://t.co/djykqVcWY2
🚨Two Cargo ships at anchor in the Shannon Estuary, Ireland
Nothing out of the ordinary, right?
Wrong. These two, MONTSERRAT owned by Latvian Alpha Shipping and KARIN owned by Estonian Hansa shipping are waiting to on-load Alumina at Aughinish & bring it to Russia
#Alumina22
When we welcomed the start of dialogue with @YouTube, we said we trusted it would lead to consistent results.
Today it has. YouTube has begun global removal of videos promoting Alabuga and other sanctioned entities. We welcome this decision and expect the process to continue.
Alabuga is a Russian weapons factory. The Shahed drones assembled there are killing Ukrainian children in their beds, striking maternity hospitals, and destroying residential buildings across our cities on a near-daily basis.
Alabuga is recruiting teenagers, some as young as 15, to work on those very production lines. Platforms that carry promotional content for Alabuga are not neutral service providers. They are part of the chain that sustains that production and enables Russian atrocities.
YouTube recognised this and acted. Structured, direct dialogue with a platform of global reach produced a global result. We are grateful for that.
We now call on all other major platforms to act without delay. The Alabuga recruitment campaign is active. It targets young people. It operates across multiple platforms simultaneously.
Every day of inaction is another day that content recruiting teenagers to a sanctioned weapons manufacturer reaches its intended audience on the open internet.
We are ready to extend the same dialogue to any platform prepared to act on the same basis.
Would the US national hockey team fly to Berlin in 1943 to play an exhibition game? Imperialist and terrorist Russia is no better than fascist Germany was. And criminal and murderer Putin is no better than Hitler!
@gatisozols@VisockisJuris@normundsbergs Muļķības, komisija NEPRASA kukijus. Nevienas iestādes top lapai kukiji nav vajadzīgi. Un arī otrā limeņa lapām nē. Un pie autorizācijas tos var apvienot ar neskaitāmajām piekrišanas formām abos virzienos (kas arī ir idiotisms).
Ukraine’s mid-range drone campaign is ripping apart Russian supply lines, and Moscow faces an impossible trilemma trying to stop it:
There are simply no cheap, efficient, and low-manpower solutions to protect Russian logistics.
Ukraine will face the same issue in the future.
Ukraine has held a decisive advantage for several months with its mid-range strike drones. Utilizing AI-enhanced and Starlink-integrated technology, these low-cost systems, including the Hornet drone, fly over 100 kilometers behind the front lines to accurately destroy Russian logistics under heavy jamming.
This strategic window of opportunity will not last forever. Russia will eventually improve its own mid-range capabilities, which are already far from non-existent, and turn this tactic back on Ukraine. The Ukrainian military must exploit this current edge and inflict maximum damage on Russian logistics networks before that shift arrives.
Even when Russia upgrades its tech, blocking Ukraine's drone campaign will remain an absolute nightmare. Because these drones are nearly immune to electronic jamming, Moscow is forced to physically stop them. They are so cheap to produce in high numbers that using traditional air defense interceptor missiles makes no economic sense.
Russia will likely turn to alternative countermeasures, such as deploying protective nets over roads, centralizing logistics into heavily defended convoys rather than vulnerable single trucks, and using anti-drone interceptor drones.
However, Russia faces a structural trap: they cannot field a solution that is simultaneously cheap, efficient, and doesn’t require too much manpower. They can only choose one or two out of three. Cheap interceptor drones require a lot of manpower along key roads. Lower-manpower systems with more range are far too expensive to deploy by the hundreds.
This dynamic provides a vital lesson for Ukraine. The Ukrainian military must immediately start preparing for the day Russia scales up its own mid-range drone campaigns (which is already starting to happen). Developing somewhat sustainable solutions right now is the only way to protect Ukrainian logistics when Russia’s tech allows it to copy this strategy
No, in fact if you model the Russians own air alerts issued to civilians, this is approximately the trajectory taken by UA drones to hit St. Petersburg and/or Ust-Luga.
@didzisdejus iedvesmoja ar savu angļu valodas eksāmena treniņu rīku — tā pati problēma bija arī matemātikā.
Uzbūvēju https://t.co/YfoTvf1N23: 1500+ reāli CE uzdevumi (2009.–2025.), bezgalīgi ģenerēti uzdevumi, paskaidrojumi katram solim. Bezmaksas.
Politiķiem un viņu tehnologiem, kas kampaņā pret progresīvajiem pazaudējuši mēra sajūtu paskaidroju:
Pērn VSAA man izmaksāja daļu no tēva uzkrātā 2. pensiju līmeņa.
Naudu, ko es labprāt nekad nebūtu saņēmis.
Ņirgas par potenciālu invaliditāti vispār ir jauns līmenis.
Ukrainian POW Oleksandr Hrytsiuk was returned weighing around 50 kilograms, covered in bruises, missing fingernails, with a broken nose after months of torture and starvation. There are hundreds of stories like these.
This is what Russian captivity means for Ukrainians
@PeterisJur@ugunsdzeseji Tāpēc, ka stulbi. Tāpat kā vairums citu valsts iestāžu mājaslapu kam kukiji nafig nav vajadzīgi kamēr nav personalizācijas. Tāpēc ka mājaslapas piegādi viņiem piegādā tikpat stulbi piegādātāji.
In some very real sense, Ozempic was invented in 1990. Pfizer ran the human trials and just never published them.
They showed it lowered blood glucose in diabetics, slowed gastric emptying, and killed hunger; the same 3 things that make Ozempic work today.
The joint venture agreement said internal data stayed internal, and that was that. Pfizer killed the program in 1991. The reasoning, as far as I can tell, was that nobody would ever want an injectable diabetes drug besides insulin.
So, the license went back to the hospital in Boston that held the patents.
Novo picked it up in 1992 and spent the next two decades building liraglutide, then semaglutide.
It's insane that data sat in a filing cabinet for 30+ years.
I only know this because Jeffrey Flier, one of the Harvard scientists in the room, finally wrote it up. He's in his late 70s and didn't want the history to die with him.
This makes you wonder what else is in those filing cabinets.
Ozempic could've existed 27 years ago.