i was readin' prof @mm1124 mamdani's book, "slow poison", and i found some inconsistencies with the events and dates he mentions that surround the expulsion of asians in 1972
i'm not sure whether to take 'em as honest editorial mistakes or the usual attempt to distort the facts and events surroundin' the expulsion
amin first publicly talked about the expulsion of asians on AUGUST 4, 1972 while in tororo speakin' to his troops
the next day, AUGUST 5, was cooperative day and in a speech on radio commemoratin' it, amin gave the ultimatum for britain to remove all Asians with british passports (all 80,000 of 'em) within 3 months, by NOVEMBER 8
then came his AUGUST 8 pronouncement in which he claimed "divine guidance" for the move
the timeline gets completely wrecked when prof. mamdani mentions that "…lord rippon flew to kampala on DECEMBER 9, without an appointment, and met a quick rebuff. he was told by officials that amin had a very tight program and could only give him an appointment a week later, on AUGUST 15…"
this is a massive chronological blunder because lord rippon actually flew in and had that historic meetin' at command post in kampala on AUGUST 15, 1972
by printin' DECEMBER 9 instead of early august, the book creates an impossible loop where an event in december leads to an appointment four months earlier in august
plus, it breaks the logic of the next pages where amin cancels professional exemptions on AUGUST 17 as a direct retaliation to that very AUGUST 15 meetin'
anyway, let me go finish my 1st book of the month
Uganda's President appoints members of the cabinet following his dairy not constitution. He's enjoying the debate surrounding his choice of Minister of State for Internal Affairs. This isn’t a mistake — it’s classic Museveni testing the waters and watching everyone react
Btw, Mzee knew exactly what he was doing with that appointment.
Whether you agree with it or not, it was a calculated move, not an accident.
Goodnight.
This is what @YusufSerunkuma thinks about Anita Among's exit. While she's gone, you probably still can't place a finger on the actual reason she was exited and exited in that manner. Maybe listening to this will guide your thoughts.
In the lively debate sparked by my brother @StKyamutetera’s thoughtful critique of @kasujja’s new style at the Uganda Media Centre, I want to weigh in with respect for the old ways and real conviction for smart change.
Government communication is indeed a serious national duty. It shapes Brand Uganda, reassures investors and diplomats, and keeps citizens informed on security, policy, and economic opportunities. Lengthy, formal releases have long delivered the needed context, nuance, and credibility, especially for diverse audiences. A hybrid approach, with a sharp summary plus full background, still makes sense for complex issues. These concerns are valid and show institutional wisdom.
Yet we must face the reality of today’s attention economy. Nobel laureate Herbert A. Simon warned back in 1971 that in an information-rich world, “the wealth of information creates a poverty of attention”.
Official statements now compete with endless scrolls, memes, and short videos. If citizens, especially the youth and busy professionals, never read dense prose, then the traditional method risks becoming more performative than truly effective.
Brevity, when handled with skill and accuracy, is not a lack of seriousness. It is strategic adaptation so that messages are actually seen, understood, and acted upon.
This is why frameworks like Axios Smart Brevity, developed by Jim VandeHei, Mike Allen, and Roy Schwartz, are now used by governments and public institutions worldwide. They rely on sharp headlines, one-sentence leads, bullets, and easy scanning, all grounded in cognitive science.
The payoff is higher engagement, better retention, and quicker spread of accurate facts, while still pointing people to deeper details.
Guidance from the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) echoes the same point: modern government messaging must be clear, relevant, accessible, and truly audience-focused to fight misinformation and build public trust.
Alan Kasujja, with his strong BBC journalism background, is not turning the Media Centre into entertainment. He is humanising and modernising a vital institution, making government more readable for Ugandans who live on smartphones and short attention spans, all while keeping the substance intact. His bold shift wins initial attention in the formats people actually use, then earns credibility through consistency and truth.
I commend Alan for this courageous step.
As Uganda chases ambitious goals like tenfold economic growth, our communication must meet citizens and the world where they are. It needs to be noticed and trusted. Of course, this innovation calls for ongoing iteration, consultation, and professional judgment, qualities Alan has in plenty.
In a nutshell, we should honour legacy norms, but relying on them alone risks irrelevance.
Alan’s approach, refined with care, strengthens Brand Uganda by making it agile, relatable, and effective. Uganda deserves communication that truly connects in the 21st century.
Well played, Alan, keep leading with clarity and courage. @UgandaMediaCent@UgandaMFA@UgEmbassySA
The Constitution was meant to be a national covenant, not the President's personal diary. Every time a political obstacle emerges, a constitutional amendment seems to follow. That's why many Ugandans view talk of further changes with suspicion rather than surprise.
@regesa At this point, Uganda's Constitution risks looking less like the supreme law of the land and more like the President's diary—amended whenever political circumstances demand a new chapter. The question, is there any provision that remains beyond alteration?