@TeeHallums What worries me more is that such a poorly conceived game with soulless design and dull gameplay is being so overhyped. This game won’t have any lasting effect on the video game landscape outside of opening the floodgates for more AI-generated dreck with “a twist”.
@stonedpomgrante @ReadsA_lot @kaylamellis_ Hilarious if you think that proves anything.
Colds develop because of our immune response to viruses we are exposed to. Mild colds tell me that my immune response is doing as it should.
@stonedpomgrante @ReadsA_lot @kaylamellis_ Man, so predictable.
Those reports come from individual state health departments. Are you saying they are all lying to make raw milk look bad? Now, that’s wild.
@stonedpomgrante @kaylamellis_ Then they didn’t have lactose intolerance or that milk had very little lactose in it. Either way, lactose intolerance is due to inactivity of lactase. If the milk has lactose, it will cause problems, regardless of pasteurisation.
Pasteurisation simply removes pathogens.
@ReceiveandStab Yet the Switch remains my most played console with the best library of games since the PS2. Nintendo doesn’t need to outperform in technical prowess, they’re already ahead where it truly matters.
@ThatSamWinkler Portal 2 remains one of the games I regard as literally flawless - it has not one thing I can malign. Humor is subjective, but I have a strong feeling these posts are heavily affected by some altering of minds.
@MaddenDude_ @eemoin@ENirenberg We lack screening tools for most clinical diagnoses - that doesn’t stop us from making them. The definition of sepsis from S-3, along with how we gauge organ dysfunction, are both crystal clear. S-3 mostly emphasizes that we should not be calling any marked immune response sepsis
@MaddenDude_ @eemoin@ENirenberg I have no qualms with it be used as an adjunct, knowing its limitations. I’ve only ever seen it used within the context of the old S-2 criteria. S-3 didn’t endorse qSOFA as a replacement, but a tool to research further. 1/2
@firdeboer_85@eemoin@ENirenberg Neither qSOFA nor SIRS are appropriate screening tools. S-3 only proposed that qSOFA be analysed as a screening tool, not be wholesale adopted. The guidelines continue to emphasise that SIRS does not define sepsis anymore.
@MaddenDude_ @eemoin@ENirenberg Assuming we can diagnose a complex pathophysiologic process based on an arbitrary 4-point score was inappropriate to begin with. Instead of continuing to use SIRS, we should be focusing on how to triage patients into the sepsis pathway in an evidence-based manner. 2/2
@MaddenDude_ @eemoin@ENirenberg I think S-3 is more specific and less confusing than anything that came before it. SIRS is an awful diagnostic tool because of poor specificity and has unacceptably low sensitivity for a screening tool (~90% in the ICU). Problem is, most people didn’t read S-3. 1/2