JNTrade

[JNTrade @JNtrades]

@ChrisCamillo @ChrisCamillo the easy money of this Robinhood chain trend is owning hood why don't you look into it?

[kooshiar @kooshiar]

Secretary @marcorubio

Iranian immigrants have long contributed to the U.S. economy, especially in STEM, medicine and AI. Most strongly oppose the Islamic regime and support the goal of a strong and secure USA under President Trump and your leadership.

Over the past few months, many have faced serious hardship due to the USCIS hold. They are here legally and often hold advanced degrees. Returning them to Iran would place them in danger and risk sending highly trained experts in strategic fields back to the Iranian regime.

We would greatly appreciate it if you could revisit this decision.

Thank you for your consideration.

[Hichkas @HichkasOfficial]

@BernieSanders "Thousands dead already"

Yes. Thousands of Islamic Republic terrorists.

We Iraninans asked for U.S. and Israel's help.

So we are greatful that Trump and Bibi are attacking the shit out of your Islamist friends.

#JavidShah
#ThankYouTrump
#ThankYouBiBi

[Mario Nawfal @MarioNawfal]

🇺🇸🇮🇷 New Yorkers took to the streets in Manhattan chanting "Trump, Bibi Thank You!" to celebrate the Iran strikes and Khamenei's death.

[JNTrade @JNtrades]

@felixhhaas @Lovable UI library

[Felix Haas @felixhhaas]

Ultimate Prompt Library for UI 🔥

I’ve been quietly building something I wish existed when I started designing with AI.

A complete UI design prompt library that helps you master different visual styles: expressive, cinematic, minimal, premium, nostalgic, warm, technical (20+ design styles in total).

Each style includes:
👉 When to use it
👉 Key vocabulary that trigger the style
👉 Copy-paste prompts for real UI work
👉 Pro tips for next-level results

Comment "UI Library" + repost and I'll share the link with you

[Hardfork ANTON @Anton__BTC]

@LillyAnoop Check the last 25x longs on daily TF, matching the bottom target of the expanding diagonal.

[Hardfork ANTON @Anton__BTC]

Short squeeze in progress, IMO.

Due to sheer amount of shorts, I consider a leading diagonal to be more probable than an impulse.
For the same reason, the leading diagonal may go higher than I initially anticipated.

However, those shorts may be owned by the market makers, thus red marked impulse remains a probability.

[Hardfork ANTON @Anton__BTC]

Bitcoin price.
This continues to be my primary scenario.
This time I'm adding the rejection area estimate.

[Titan @Washigorira]

#Ethereum 🚀 $6,700 Target in 2025.

#ETH is advancing within a right-angled descending broadening wedge on the weekly chart.

📌 First stop: $4,100 (short-term target).
📌 Once the breakout is confirmed, the $6,700 price objective could be next.

Patience is key.

[Elliottwave Forecast @ElliottForecast]

$SPX is currently showing minimal swings within the Grand Super Cycle. What comes next is unlikely to be subtle — either a sharp crash or a super bullish acceleration.

We've laid out all possible scenarios in our latest article:
🔗 https://t.co/fqhI0VVggV

Without question, this is shaping up to be one of the most critical periods for global indices in recent history. #elliottwave #trading $SPY $ES_F $NQ_F $YM_F $DJ_F $DAX $FTSE $NKD_F #SPX #NASDAQ #DOWJONES

[CrediBULL Crypto @CredibleCrypto]

Bitcoin continues to look solid af here.

Not expecting any major dips as we continue to climb.

At this point if the idea is correct we should absolutely not see 110k or below and realistically would not even expect a retest of our range highs at 112k at this point.

This bodes well for the entire market.

Let's get it fam.

$BTC

[CrediBULL Crypto @CredibleCrypto]

A follower pointed out that the idea I shared below is a literal textbook example of a complex correction ending with a triangle as a "Y" wave that can be found in Frost and Prechters "Elliott Wave Principle" on pg. 53.

I've added the image from the book on the chart for reference.

Beautiful spot and a great example of how these things can realistically be found and pre-emptively identified in actual markets. Of course this is not the ONLY possible combo, but it helps when you have an idea of the type of PA (and potential variations) you may be looking for at any given time.

$BTC

[JNTrade @JNtrades]

@mattshumer_ Would like to test it.

[Hardfork ANTON @Anton__BTC]

Quoted post update.
Bitcoin is printing orange scenario, but with blue depth.

[Meet Kevin @realMeetKevin]

⚠️VERY Unpopular DeepSeek opinion ⚠️

Most, including the CEO of Microsoft, say:
➡️ Price down.
➡️ Demand up.

Here's why this is wrong and why Nvidia stock is crashing.

The CEO of Microsoft is using an economic 101 (5th grade / elementary) analysis. Price down, demand up. This only works if BUYERS are PRICE SENSITIVE.

In order to understand if "demand will go up," we must understand the ELASTICITY OF DEMAND.

Basically, how much does demand go up when the price goes down?

Well, let's ask: What's the price for different groups?
➡️ Users? $0-20/mo
➡️ Small/med Businesses? $0-$120/mo
➡️ Mega enterprises? Price doesn't matter right now; they're spending billions whether it's worth it or not.

Okay, so for the individuals up to medium businesses, price means is basically $0. So reducing price shouldn't affect their demand.

They use what they need and move on.

For mega enterprises / mega caps, price is irrelevant: they're willing to spend BILLIONS anyway without any calculation of ROI.

MAYBE this is good for schools/research institutions as they can use A LOT for cheaper. This is potentially an increase of demand. Outside of research, though:

Therefore, it stands to reason:
✅ A change in the price of AI is unlikely to change the demand for AI.

This sounds counterintuitive. But the point is:
➡️ There's no lack of supply.
➡️ The price is near 0 for those who care about price
➡️ The price doesn't matter for those who don't care about price

Therefore, DeepSeek, IMO, does not meaningfully change demand for AI. There is nearly NO price sensitivity.

HOWEVER, cheaper MegaCap AI spend may boost EPS at companies relying on AI.
➡️ Apple can do their AI work with less $
➡️ Microsoft can do their AI work with less $
➡️ Meta can do their AI work with less $
➡️ Tesla can do their AI work with less $

⚠️So big companies will be able to conduct their AI-work with less hit to EPS / bottom line. This is good for basically ALL companies EXCEPT:
➡️ Chip designers (Nvidia/AMD/Arm)
➡️ Manufacturers/related (TSM/ASML)
➡️ Chip adjacents (SMCI/water cooling/servers/Dell)

But it actually SUPPORTS existing businesses using AI at the mega-cap scale - where demand won't necessarily go up, but SAVINGS will go up.

Now on Nvidia.
➡️ If demand for AI doesn't go up meaningfully
➡️ And existing demand can be satiated with 1/20th the chips
Then Nvidia goes from growing at 30% per year in 2025
To potentially negative growth.

At 30% EPS growth the next 4 years, Nvidia trades for 1.7 PEG (good). At 5% growth, it trades for a 10 PEG (bad).

That's why the stock is falling.

In addition to growth writedowns, the true risk now is... GDP.
➡️ If we staked our GDP on AI, and GDP growth turns negative, we face layoffs and recession.
➡️ We want to avoid that. So, hopefully, GDP isn't as reliant on AI as it appears it may have been in 2023/2024.

[Elliott Wave Unc @CryptoKnee]

#BTC
Still on the fence about the degree here.
Looking at the EWO and typical Wave 5 targets, we usually see a bit more.
Trading a potential wave 5 of wave 5 of wave 5 is risky—been burned before.
Not all out, just more cautious and examining closely.
#Elliottwave #Priceaction

[Bluntz @Bluntz_Capital]

from an EW perspective every single wave within this bull run on $btc can potentially be accounted for now imo.

every subwave within the w5 that started back in august AND 5 waves from within the cycle bottom lows.

can we go higher from here? sure its possible, does this mean you should 100% cash out? probs not, because youll likely just fomo back in at any sign of strength.

as i said yesterday though, at least taking some chips off the table would be wise.

[Bluntz @Bluntz_Capital]

for anyone curious, this is how i think the next few weeks plays out for $btc

[Bravos Research @bravosresearch]

The yield curve has just un-inverted

This also happened in 1990, 2000, and 2008

All 3 ended in sharp economic downturns

Is this time different?

A thread 🧵