Jeremy Willis

[Jeremy Willis @jnwillis22]

@TTrades_edu Glad you found that. Hidden hazards for a lot of folks.

[Sama Hoole @SamaHoole]

The crime they see: 15,415 litres of water to produce one kilogram of beef. Every campaign, every documentary, every leaflet through the door since about 2012.

The crime they do: not reading the paper.

The figure is real. It comes from Mekonnen and Hoekstra at the University of Twente, and it is careful, peer-reviewed work. What the campaigns strip out is that the same authors split that number into three parts, because the three parts are not the same thing at all.

Green water is rain. It falls on the grass. The cow eats the grass. For beef, green water is about 94 per cent of that headline.

Blue water is the stuff that matters. Rivers, lakes, aquifers. The stuff that gets pumped, metered, fought over in court, and does not come back.

So here is the blue water, in litres per kilogram, from the same authors, same method, same units.

- Pistachios: 7,602
- Almonds: 3,816
- Walnuts: 2,451
- Dates: 1,250
- Cashews: 921
- Beef: 550

Read that last line again, then go and look at what is in your granola.

The 15,415 counts rain that fell on a Welsh hillside as a cost, against an animal that was standing in it, on land where nothing else grows, in a country where rain is the one thing we have never once been short of.

The pistachio is drinking fourteen times more of the water that actually runs out.

She is outside in the rain right now, getting blamed for it.

[Jeremy Willis @jnwillis22]

@TTrades_edu 500k is amazing and will be well deserved, not long now! Well done sir.

[Jeremy Willis @jnwillis22]

@TTrades_edu Funny, was just saying to a colleague this is one of my issues. Great timing T, thank you.

[Jeremy Willis @jnwillis22]

@IanRunkle Better than your typical courtroom drawing right there. See if you can set him up a recurring gig!

[Jeremy Willis @jnwillis22]

@nikitabier @Jason May I also suggest an addition to the Grok list where it says “explain this” or “is this true”, or perhaps to Grok itself. An “explain acronyms and abbreviations” function.

[Jeremy Willis @jnwillis22]

@TTrades_edu I’m in. What’s an hour compared to days of freedom?

[Jeremy Willis @jnwillis22]

@zokopoko1337 @TTrades_edu @_amtrades What a great take. There’s a lot of similarities isn’t there?

[Jeremy Willis @jnwillis22]

@TTrades_edu Slamming like button repeatedly…

[Jeremy Willis @jnwillis22]

@TTrades_edu By the daily profile, are you meaning AM’s profile, yours, or a manual read? I use your indicator and I had a bearish bias today.

[Jeremy Willis @jnwillis22]

@__0HOUR1_ A gentleman. We had Stampede Wrestling as a fundraiser at our school, got to set up the ring and provide security. Fun card, and he and Lethal Larry Cameron put on quite the main event.

[Jeremy Willis @jnwillis22]

@Bentrades_ttfm Not seeing it yet Ben, I might have wrong settings for DM’s. Try again?

[F🍁CK CARNEY🇨🇦 @bashscriptorz]

🚨 KILL BILL S-206 🚨
The Enforcement Switch Behind Every Other Bill

⚠️ The Distraction Strategy

Parliament is flooding Canadians with dozens of bills at once — each controversial, each alarming — for one reason: to hide the keystone bill that makes them all enforceable.

That bill is S-206.

Different sectors. Different rights. One enforcement engine.

🧩 The Pattern You’re Supposed to Miss

Yes, many bills are advancing at the same time — and they fall into familiar clusters:

Due Process & Court Rights

S-206 — Administrative Monetary Penalties (AMPs)

C-63 — Online Harms

C-27 — Digital Charter / AI regulation

Parliamentary Power Shift

C-26 — Critical Cyber Systems

C-11 / C-18 — Online Streaming & News control

Property & Land Control

C-234 — Agriculture restrictions

S-241 — Jane Goodall Act

C-49 — Atlantic Accord amendments

Speech, Assembly & Religion

C-63, C-261, C-70, C-9

Each attacks a different freedom.
All depend on one thing: the power to punish without courts.

🎯 The Keystone: Bill S-206

S-206 is the hub.
It allows federal departments to issue penalties without:

hearings

judges

trials

due process

common-law protections

meaningful judicial review

It turns agencies into investigator, prosecutor, judge, and enforcer — all in one.

That is not democracy.

⚙️ What S-206 Enables

Data alone cannot control people. Punishment does.

S-206 is the enforcement engine behind:

Digital ID

CBDCs

Carbon allowances

Smart-meter penalties

Travel scoring

Online speech controls

Zoning & land-use mandates

Biosafety / One-Health rules

Remove the keystone → the entire system collapses.

🧠 Why So Many Bills at Once?

Because if Canadians focus on S-206, the agenda dies.

The noise is intentional:

Scatter attention

Exhaust the public

Create outrage fatigue

Prevent organized resistance

Slip the core bill through unnoticed

This is how large control systems are built.

🏗️ The Digital Governance Architecture

What they’re building:

Digital ID → who you are

CBDCs → what you buy

Carbon scoring → how you move & heat your home

Online harms laws → what you say

Smart meters → how you use utilities

Biosafety rules → what you grow or own

None of it works without instant penalties.
That penalty system is S-206.

💣 If S-206 Falls, Everything Else Fails

If S-206 is stopped:

Digital ID enforcement collapses

CBDC controls collapse

Carbon rationing collapses

Online harms penalties collapse

Smart-meter enforcement collapses

Surveillance becomes information-only

Remove the hub → the wheel falls off.

📢 The Message Canadians Must Hear

The other bills are distractions.
S-206 is the enforcement engine.

If we fight 20 bills, we lose.
If we stop one, we win.

Kill Bill S-206 — now.

🏛View the current status of Senate Bill S-206 here: https://t.co/CCp5NHb8T4

[Jeremy Willis @jnwillis22]

@TraderSumo1 I think with my risk mgmt I would have as many as I could afford but only trade a certain amount of them at a time. But it would be cost dependant. Excited to see this post, you must be getting closer to launch.

[Jeremy Willis @jnwillis22]

Friends, I’m in a bind. If you get this and are of the mind, a small prayer would be much appreciated. Thank you.

[Jeremy Willis @jnwillis22]

@BrianRoemmele 🫡

[Jeremy Willis @jnwillis22]

@champagneszn777 For what it’s worth, I gave my ideal scenario in a prop firm to Grok on here and asked it to find the five closest examples to it. Found some options I wasn’t even aware of.

[Jeremy Willis @jnwillis22]

@hiattb @MBrant75 Great seats Brian. Looks like a blast.

[Jeremy Willis @jnwillis22]

@Axel_bitblaze69 Why v5? TradingView on pine script v6 now, boots v5 versions out?