joao ˢᶜᶦ

entusiasta do brasfoot

[A @aster_ooooid]

Damn they’re all retarded

[Tomas Pueyo @tomaspueyo]

Brazil has one map

[joao ˢᶜᶦ @joao_mateus_b]

@joaoeigen Twitter me recomendou teus posts. Desde então, conquistaste um leitor. Tens boas críticas e com temas muito presentes no linguajar do povo (a saber: na…z1…/smo e comunismo). Estar letrado nesses 2 temas hoje significa ganhar no argumento de 95% da nação.

[John LeFevre @JohnLeFevre]

Chess has no height, no muscle, no referees, and no judges.

It's the purest meritocracy ever invented.

Men are overrepresented at the top of chess for the same reason they're 93% of the prison population.

More men at both extremes.

[Handre @Handre]

Socialism is impossible. Read that again.

Here is why:

1. Ludwig von Mises and the Calculation Problem; then 2. Friedrich Hayek and the Knowledge Problem.

They are distinct, and it's important to understand the difference.

Mises fired first. In his 1920 paper "Economic Calculation in the Socialist Commonwealth," he drove a stake through the heart of central planning by showing that rational economic calculation is impossible without private ownership of the means of production. Prices are not arbitrary numbers. They are signals generated by actual bids and offers between property owners who face real profit and loss. Strip away private property, and you strip away the bidding process. Strip away the bidding process, and prices become bureaucratic guesses. A Soviet planner deciding how much steel to allocate between rail construction and tractor manufacturing has no genuine price for steel because no one is buying or selling it freely. He is flying blind. The problem is structural, not administrative. Hire smarter planners, give them faster computers; it changes nothing. The information cannot exist without the market process that generates it.

Communists read this and realized Mises was right. They found a roundabout way to keep going. They would simply use prices from Western capitalist countries.

Then Hayek hit them with his 1945 essay "The Use of Knowledge in Society." His target was subtly different. Hayek accepted that prices aggregate information. His contribution was to identify what kind of information markets process: local, dispersed, tacit knowledge that no central authority can collect. A warehouse manager in Düsseldorf knows that his particular supplier is three weeks behind schedule. A farmer in Kansas knows the soil conditions on his specific plot after last month's frost. A textile merchant in Lyon knows which dyes his buyers currently prefer. None of this knowledge is written down anywhere. Much of it the people holding it cannot fully articulate. It lives in habits, relationships, and on-the-ground experience accumulated over years. No survey, no commissar's report, no algorithm extracts it reliably. You cannot copy it from one country to another.

Mises showed that central planners lack the mechanism to generate rational prices. Hayek showed that even if planners somehow had prices, they still could not possess the ground-level knowledge those prices encode. Mises's problem kills socialist calculation at the structural level. Hayek's problem kills it at the epistemological level. The two arguments are complementary, stacked on top of each other like floors of a building.

The Soviet Union ran this entire experiment in full. Central planners in Moscow set over 20 million prices by the late Soviet period. Shortages and surpluses coexisted everywhere. Bread rotted in one city while another city's bread lines stretched around the block. Planners were not uniquely corrupt or stupid. They were operating inside an institutional structure that made rational allocation geometrically impossible, exactly as Mises predicted in 1920 and exactly as Hayek's epistemology explained in 1945.

Every government price control, every production quota, every centralized allocation scheme you live under today repeats this mistake at a smaller scale. The mechanism fails whether the commodity is steel, housing, or healthcare. The scale changes; the logic does not.

[joao ˢᶜᶦ @joao_mateus_b]

@R38TAO Você acha que políticos deveriam ter resultado de QI aberto ao público? O QI dos candidatos iria influenciar no voto do povo? (sugestão: fazer teste padronizado da Sigma)

[joao ˢᶜᶦ @joao_mateus_b]

@R38TAO basicamente do quanto há de dinheiro em circulação
Que se estudar 10 minutos ja percebe que não dá pra ser verdade

[joao ˢᶜᶦ @joao_mateus_b]

@R38TAO Ae 38tao tenho um amigo que diz que tu esta errado num topico especifico de economia:

“o que ele aborda de inflação é uma inverdade
Coisa que ele fala para catapultar suas vendas de curso de btc. Basicamente ele fala q a inflação na verdade é medida pelo Indice m1 que é basicame

[joao ˢᶜᶦ @joao_mateus_b]

24 e 38% para quem teve um determinado aumento na linha de base desse biomarcador no sangue

[joao ˢᶜᶦ @joao_mateus_b]

Novas leituras JAMA:
Um biomarcador Tau-217 teve associação positiva para prognóstico de evolução para disfunção cognitiva na doença de Alzheimer. É uma coorte que vem desde 2004. Resultados mostram 478 indivíduos dentre os 2684 com disfunção, sendo o Risco Absoluto entre

[joao ˢᶜᶦ @joao_mateus_b]

@intankaveis Prazer aí Renatão e intankaveis, sempre acompanhando

[joao ˢᶜᶦ @joao_mateus_b]

Animais perigosos é um indie que explora o gênero serial killer/tubarões. Gostei bastante da imagem apesar dos efeitos especiais serem do nível de tiktok de indiano. Ninguém é desenvolvido o que torna o resto menos envolvente, além de ser previsível com final horrendo.
6️⃣

[joao ˢᶜᶦ @joao_mateus_b]

@daryldxen linda

[joao ˢᶜᶦ @joao_mateus_b]

meu irmão em cristo, olha a porra que eu tinha me metido

[joao ˢᶜᶦ @joao_mateus_b]

@daryldxen 😎

[joao ˢᶜᶦ @joao_mateus_b]

Hermes Trismegisto

[joao ˢᶜᶦ @joao_mateus_b]

calma williandovski