Jodster N

Politically incorrect, unvaccinated, conspiracy-theorist asshole. I repost relevant shit but you won’t like my truths. 😬👍

[Jodster N @JodsterN]

@kacdnp91 @Jikkyleaks Well it IS almost mid-terms and another DemPanic is needed for mail in ballot voting.

[Jikkyleaks 🐭 @Jikkyleaks]

@CatsRule2023 This is bad

[Jodster N @JodsterN]

@tomselliott @WesternLensman Sounds like a former presidential candidate that took her first bong rip.

[Jodster N @JodsterN]

@Gunblaze1969 Knowing Trudeau, it probably started out as three fully assembled deck chairs

[Jodster N @JodsterN]

@HPM1984Concord @DNIPulte Well that was a load of horseshit

[The Vigilant Fox 🦊 @VigilantFox]

In 2016, Del Bigtree convinced a top infectious disease doctor to do something public health has avoided for decades: conduct a study comparing the health outcomes of vaxxed vs. unvaxxed children.

Dr. Marcus Zervos vowed to publish the results no matter what.

The results were devastating for the vaccinated, and Dr. Zervos ultimately chose not to publish the study.

When confronted about it, he said bluntly: “Publishing something like that, I might as well retire. I’d be finished.”

Here’s what the study revealed:

• Vaccinated children were 4.29 times more likely to have asthma.

• Three times higher risk for atopic diseases (like eczema).

• Nearly six times higher risk for autoimmune disorders, a category that includes more than 80 different diseases.

• 5.5 times higher risk for neurodevelopmental disorders.

• 2.9 times more motor disabilities.

• 4.5 times more speech disorders.

• Three times more developmental delays.

• Six times more acute and chronic ear infections.

• Among nearly 2,000 unvaccinated children, there were zero cases of ADHD, diabetes, behavioral problems, learning disabilities, intellectual disabilities, tics, or other psychological disorders.

The study’s conclusion was equally striking. It states: “[I]n contrast to our expectations, we found that exposure to vaccination was independently associated with an overall 2.5-fold INCREASE in the likelihood of developing a chronic health condition when compared to children unexposed to vaccination.”

When science uncovers an inconvenient result, it often gets buried, or the data is twisted until it produces the outcome “The Science” wants.

How do you think Vioxx, a migraine and arthritis pain drug, made it to market?

An estimated 100,000 people died before the manufacturer (Merck) finally decided it was too dangerous to keep prescribing.

And Vioxx wasn’t an isolated case.

Roughly 1 in 3 drugs approved by the FDA get pulled or receive a major safety warning LONG AFTER they get prescribed to millions of people.

If Vioxx could be approved without the danger being flagged during trials, what else is on the market today that people assume is safe?

Perhaps the most important question is: how do they get away with rigging these trials in the first place? 🧵

[Jodster N @JodsterN]

@vesperdigital @ShaunRickard67 @GadSaad Transfer every stock you own to Sprott $PSLV. Redeem for physical. Sell for cash. Move to crypto. Tell the Liberals to fuck themselves.

[Jodster N @JodsterN]

@CallMeFebel @MorbidKnowledge The squatters aren’t homeless if they’re occupying someone else’s home. You’re a great guy.

[Jodster N @JodsterN]

@GadSaad As a Jew, you should have been aware of the benefits of accumulating physical gold and silver.

[Ava- I Love My USA! 🇺🇸 @WEdwarda]

@DNIGabbard He lied and lied over and over again.

[DNI Tulsi Gabbard @DNIGabbard]

Today, on my final day as Director of National Intelligence, I’m releasing never-before-seen communications and documents exposing how Dr. Fauci provided millions in US taxpayer dollars to fund dangerous gain-of-function research at the Wuhan lab, worked with politicized elements within the Intelligence Community to suppress the truth about his actions and hide the virus’ lab-leak origins, and lied to Congress while under oath in 2024. It’s time you know the truth.

https://t.co/3YJSstB7d4

[Kris Eriksen @KEriksenV2]

Will you consider leaving social media entirely or Canada, if Bill’s C-2, C-8, C-9, C-11, C-22, C-34 & 63 become Law?

[Jodster N @JodsterN]

@ScottPresler Don’t give in. Don’t give up. For every voice you hear giving you support, Scott, there are 100 more silent supporters in the wings.

[Jodster N @JodsterN]

@RWMaloneMD Deer populations in eastern Canada have exponentially exploded. Rodents, birds and deer are the dominant vectors for tick transfer. This will not end well

[Ivano Defazio 🇨🇦🇮🇹🇺🇸 @DefazioIvano]

American Glenn Beck dives deep into Canada's Liberal corruption.

[Pierre Kory, MD MPA @PierreKory]

Temporal association is one of the most telling data points for a diagnostician. To learn that over 9,000 of the Covid vaccine deaths reported to VAERS occurred within 2 days of injection and were willfully ignored by the CDC and FDA is both unconscionable.. and unsurprising.

[Jodster N @JodsterN]

@DumbFoxFurry I didn’t know X had a mental disorder where it thought it could be another app.

[🏴‍☠️🇨🇦 GC 🇺🇸🏴‍☠️ @ce_msm]

C’en est fini de la liberté d’expression au Canada.

Les libéraux font passer en force les projets de loi suivants :

- C-9 (loi contre la haine)
- C-22 (accès légal/surveillance)
- C-34 (sécurité numérique)

Trois projets de loi qui, ensemble, anéantiront nos droits fondamentaux.

- C-9 (Loi contre la haine) :

Élargit considérablement la définition de la haine (haine/diffamation), supprime les défenses religieuses établies de longue date pour l’expression de bonne foi et facilite les poursuites criminelles sans le consentement du procureur général. Critiquer, prêcher ou même afficher certains symboles pourrait désormais vous valoir des accusations criminelles. Finies les protections pour la liberté d’expression religieuse et les débats publics sensibles.

- C-22 (accès légal) :

Oblige les fournisseurs d’accès Internet à conserver les métadonnées pendant un an, facilite l’accès à vos données par la police et le SCRS et permet au ministre d’imposer des droits d’accès (des portes dérobées déguisées). Surveillance de masse de vos communications numériques sans mandat. Votre vie en ligne devient totalement transparente pour l'État.

- Projet de loi C-34 (Loi sur la sécurité numérique) :

Ce projet de loi crée une puissante Commission gouvernementale de la sécurité numérique qui dictera aux plateformes, aux chatbots et aux services en ligne ce qu'ils doivent censurer, comment vérifier l'âge des utilisateurs et comment se protéger contre les contenus préjudiciables. Contrôle d'âge obligatoire, plans de sécurité imposés, amendes colossales et pouvoir discrétionnaire étendu pour décider de ce qui est acceptable. Une censure centralisée au nom de la protection des enfants. Ensemble, ces trois projets de loi transforment le Canada en un État de surveillance et de censure généralisée.

Vous ne pourrez plus parler, partager ni même penser librement sans risquer d'être signalé, surveillé ou poursuivi. Les voix dissidentes, les critiques de l'immigration, les débats religieux, les opinions controversées, tout devient risqué.
Roman Baber l'explique parfaitement dans cette vidéo de 9 min 36 s. Regardez-la avant qu'il ne soit trop tard.

Ce n'est plus de la gouvernance. C'est la mort de la liberté d'expression telle que nous la connaissions au Canada. Les libéraux ont choisi de bafouer totalement les droits des citoyens.
Réveillez-vous !
Partagez ce message.
Résistez !
Le temps presse.

[ThePersistence @ScottPresler]

IT’S OFFICIAL

I’m now an elected official in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.

Thank you to every single voter that elected me in the May 19th primary.

I will be in person at the Summer meeting to represent Beaver County, PA.

[Valerie Anne Smith @ValerieAnne1970]

SHOCKING NEW STUDY: Sunscreen USERS Face DRAMATICALLY HIGHER Skin Cancer Risk

A massive UK Biobank analysis of 470,000+ people just revealed:

- Invasive Melanoma: +292% higher risk
- Basal Cell Carcinoma: +140% higher risk
- Squamous Cell Carcinoma: +126% higher risk

These alarming signals held strong even after adjusting for age, sex, skin type, tanning ability, sunburn history, sunlamp use, and time spent outdoors.

You slather on hormone-disrupting chemicals that get absorbed into your bloodstream… block vitamin D (your body’s #1 cancer shield)… and end up with*triple the melanoma risk?

Sunburns are bad — but this “protection” is making things far worse.

Time to ditch the chemical cocktails. Sensible sun + mineral zinc if needed. Your skin deserves better.