@georgebell@6ixbuzztv Most street preachers are literally crazy. And this was also a 3 second clip…using your head you would assume de escalation took place prior…..
@IverTheGreat22@NotoriousKDE@Optimisticbger lol nah. If they advance and he jumps then they get investigated for that. At least this way when it’s looked at it’s clean for the police.
@KathrynLapp2026 Do you really think we wouldn’t pay income tax? You believe a dude that said to drink bleach? Omfg people are actually stupid. Job security for me though so I welcome people like you
@Doobyscoo1234@ABHank76467601@KirkLubimov Well this account is a backup Jensen’s the followers in 4 years since you’re still hung up on that. And I get it you’re pro government wasting money. That’s fine man. I’m not a fan of it and that’s my perspective.
@Doobyscoo1234@ABHank76467601@KirkLubimov You brought up the follower count, not me. Now you’re explaining that followers just magically appear from good conversations. You don’t get to open with a profile check and then act like you’re above it. The bigger issues don’t make the smaller waste disappear.
@Doobyscoo1234@ABHank76467601@KirkLubimov That’s the same energy as bickering girls in a group chat going ‘she only has 12 friends.’ When the actual argument runs out, the follower count is always the next move. Cute move little guy.
@ABHank76467601@Doobyscoo1234@KirkLubimov I can be pissed about both. The daily interest is a disaster. A $130M non-binding referendum that still couldn’t open on time is also a waste.
One doesn’t cancel the other, and ‘your friends’ doesn’t change the invoice.
@ABHank76467601@Doobyscoo1234@KirkLubimov The national debt interest is a disaster. Using it to defend a provincial $130M stunt is just ‘look over there’ with extra steps. One doesn’t excuse the other.
@Doobyscoo1234@WeAreCanProud You’re right, we won’t get anywhere. You started by defending a $130M non-binding referendum with missing furniture, then pivoted to federal waste, then childcare lotteries, then ‘all governments waste money so this is fine.’
That’s not side-stepping. That’s the entire defence.
@Doobyscoo1234@KirkLubimov All governments waste money so this one is fine’ is the softest defence possible.
You’re not arguing the $130M was well spent. You’re arguing that because other governments are also bad, we should stop noticing this one. That’s not principle. That’s just team loyalty
@Doobyscoo1234@WeAreCanProud You’re the one who dragged federal spending into a defence of Alberta’s $130M referendum. Now that it doesn’t land, suddenly they’re ‘two different topics
@Doobyscoo1234@KirkLubimov You’re fine with the $130M temp check the same way people are fine with burning money once they’ve already spent it.
Calling it useful because other governments waste more doesn’t make this one productive. It just means the bar is on the floor.
@Doobyscoo1234@WeAreCanProud Defending a $130M non-binding referendum by pointing at federal waitlists is wild. Both can be expensive theatre that mostly helps the connected.