Ghana ๐ฌ๐ญ, Cape Verde ๐จ๐ป, Egypt ๐ช๐ฌ, Senegal ๐ธ๐ณ, South Africa ๐ฟ๐ฆ, Morocco ๐ฒ๐ฆ and Cote d'Ivoire ๐จ๐ฎ have all qualified for the Round of 32 at the 2026 FIFA World Cup.
Bro, if itโs really 0.1% daily, thatโs 36.5% p.a. simple interest (about 44% compounded). Ghana T-bills are around 11% p.a. currently. For a โsavingsโ product, that return is unusually high. The question is: how exactly is the interest calculated and whatโs the underlying risk?
@jengajar If the returns come from lending, then the real discussion is the quality of the loan book, not the companyโs risk appetite.
Risk appetite doesnโt generate cash flows. Performing loans do. Whatโs your current NPL ratio?? Loan to deposit ratio? interest rate on loans ?
@0nly_FactsHere@jengajar Loansโ is fine in theory, but the details matter.
Whatโs their deposit-to-loan ratio? Whatโs the pricing on those loans to sustain 0.1% daily returns 36% annually: whats their NPL ratio?
Credit risk is the whole business and defaults donโt disappear because returns are promised
@0nly_FactsHere Exactly and I agree on the caution. We have seen enough in this market to question anything that sounds โtoo good.โ
My only position is simple: they should just clearly explain the structure, regulation, and where the returns are coming from or funds are invested in. @jengajar
@drkab_1@jengajar 1. Where exactly are funds invested to generate 0.1% daily?
2. Is this return fixed or performance-based?
3. What protects my capital if returns fall below target?
4. Which regulator in Ghana approves this product?
5. Can you show historical performance proving sustainability?
@drkab_1 If this is marketed as a low-risk savings product, how are they generating enough returns to comfortably pay 36.5% p.a. When Ghana T-bills which is seen as the benchmark for low risk is are 11% p.a.?
36.5% oooo lol thatโs too good to be true bro.