@francisdeng@AnonRadDoc I had a similar experience and didn’t realize how amazing it is until after I was an attending. Nothing else can compete. It blows my mind how low quality StatDx is comparatively.
@francisdeng Absolutely agree with you, but yes. But feel like any nuance in stroke imaging has already been lost to CT/CTA for all. Used to have to fight to get reflexive CT perfusions cancelled on dizziness patients.
@NeilPowrie@northwoods1980 But is that the context of what it was studied in? Seems like a potential misapplication. All I can find in general is language that it should be used to stratify osteopenic patients.
@northwoods1980@NeilPowrie I agree this isn’t correct but I caved a while ago and started putting in the score “for reference” because clinicians kept complaining. Do you have a reference on the FRAX website? Having trouble finding it there.
@francisdeng Want to use this terminology, but often feel there are cases where I’m not sure. Any guidance in the literature on when to call “non-fracture deformity”? Feel like there are plenty of cases where I’m not sure, though I’m guilty of overusing ambiguous language when I don’t need to
@francisdeng Do you put caveats on overestimation when it’s near the 30 mL threshold? Assuming they used the same simple volume calculation so best to just leave be, but clearly inaccurate in many cases depending on hemorrhage morphology.