@glennkirschner2@xtrixcyclex Let us not be mistaken, it is the Republican Senate that will be on trial.
Can a corrupt Senate collude with a corrupt President? How will the Constitution deal with that?
@SecularOutpost Interesting. I’m thinking necessarily true == tautology -> vacuous. Or were you thinking necessarily true == factual; the issue with the second is facts require intersubjective concordance? Or perhaps I don’t understand
@SecularOutpost Best argument I’ve heard against this is the teleological argument that god is the first cause.
(Without which nothing else would have started to exist)
Kind of neat really, the cause IS the end.
@SecularOutpost I probably condensed that too much. What I’m trying to get at is with common intersubjective experience I can use just a few words to conjure up entire universe for someone else.
@SecularOutpost I think I see where your mind is going, however, given a lack of agreement aren’t we just assessing degrees of objectivity that result from different methods?
Please consider our minds are the ‘truth tellers’ and our minds are not all alike and vary over time.
@SecularOutpost Oh come on, that totally depends on your point of view 😂
The serious question is how do our minds choose which meaning is appropriate in a given context? How do we think of that, pragmatism in action?
The Content Moderation Council hath spoken. Trump is reinstated. We’ll see what happens next, e.g., if he moves back to Twitter what’s the impact on Truth Social? Lots left to play out here, but given his candidacy, this is probably the right decision. For now.
The Content Moderation Council hath spoken. Trump is reinstated. We’ll see what happens next, e.g., if he moves back to Twitter what’s the impact on Truth Social? Lots left to play out here, but given his candidacy, this is probably the right decision. For now.