Great margin of safety at $25 for great long duration marcellus + haynesville shale assets. Don’t see how this doesn’t work. Unless you’re a nat gas bear from here.
$WHK is paying a $2.00/share annual dividend (8% yield) at a ~77% CAD payout ratio. That puts annual CAD (comparable to FCF) at a low end of $2.50/share (10% yield). I think the acquisition runway is strong and DC + export demand is a long term tailwind.
@DDBlakeFischer Good to know! Thanks for doing the work. Would you consider fabless a tier below all of these in terms of durability? I feel like there’s more competition for NVDA and AVGO between eachother, AMD, etc. Just feels like there’s less barriers to entry.
@DDBlakeFischer What about down cycle? I would imagine operating under capacity hurts TSM margins far more than say ASML, not just because maintenance capex is higher but reccuring mix is lower (ik this also decreases down cycle but at least margins stay high).
@DDBlakeFischer Agree on valuation for the EDA companies. For TSM it’s simply the capital intensity. It’s as durable as any other company on this list but due to the capital intensity I think you can capture the same upside through cycle with equipment names (ASML, KLAC) with better economics.
Nobody should be investing in semis right now without having read Ed Chancellor’s book on investing through market cycles.
I see investors I respect using NTM PE to value cyclical businesses at the top of the cycle. Yes. A single year’s estimated earnings. 🤦♂️
Looks like value might finally be emerging in energy royalties and semi equipment names after this rotation today. Added to $TPZ.TO, looking at $TPL $PSK.TO $ASML $LRCX $APH if they drop further.
@ReneSellmann Fair enough. Generally a sector I avoid. I haven’t done any research on $RDDT but honestly I think there is a real moat / tailwind here. Personally, the more the internet gets saturated with AI, the more i turn to reddit because I seek authentic human thinking and opinions.
@invest091 Yeah, they have the only landfill in all of vermont which is an incredible asset. Also the fact that they are smaller means every acquisition has a proportionally larger contribution to growth compared to the big 3. Enjoy your research!
@invest091 Ahh fair enough. The whole take private situation with $GFL is weird and I already don’t love their leverage. $CWST and $WCN are the only two in my investible universe. $CWST has some incredible scarce assets in the northeast and roll-up acquisitions are very margin accretive.
@CamperdownCo Increasing the proportion of positive outcomes in your distribution just gives you more ways to win and a larger margin of safety. So many want to concentrate just to concentrate, I guess risk management isn’t cool.
@CamperdownCo You absolutely don’t need to own a little of everything, however, I think many retail investors underestimate how many great companies there are out there. There are many more genuinely durable businesses with strong tailwinds and operating leverage than you think.