Johnny Remington

[Johnny Remington @johnsmithy1996]

You are a fucking idiot then.

Femdom of religion was never about Muslims, or Jews or any other religion besides Christianity.

The first amendment was created so that the catholics in Maryland, the Baptists of Rhode Island, the Episcopalians in Connecticut and the Congregationalists of Massachusetts could all coexist with each other. It was a pan Protestant experiment, nothing more.

The founders and framers of the USA would be horrified to hear and think it treason to see so many Muslims, Hindus, Jews and others represented and protected under the 1st amendment.

These people are guests in this nation. And that is all they ever will be. Unless they turn from guests to conquerors. Which increasingly when we look at Europe seems to be their intent.

Regardless I will not share a nation or be countrymen with a group of people whose theology rests in the words of a warlord pedophile.

[Johnny Remington @johnsmithy1996]

Barely literate? Maybe? Never claimed to be a great writer. Though I do love to read.

Chud? Ehh. Depends on who you ask.

Doesn’t like my partner? What ever gave you that impression? I love my “partner” and we have an amazing life together. I just don’t like double standards. Which was my contention with the OP.

Also market? I’m shitposting for fun brother man. Idgaf about no market 😂😂😂😂

[Johnny Remington @johnsmithy1996]

@_parasocial @RealDianeYap Correct. It was my leaning on the use of auto correct that failed me in this situation. Excellent detective work!

[Johnny Remington @johnsmithy1996]

See the thing is that threats like these don’t really land anymore. The reason they don’t land is that most men already feel like this is their reality, anyway. Most men, if they are honest, will say that if they were suddenly unable to provide for their family, they think that their female significant other would abandon them.

Funny how most women don’t have nearly the same reservations about withholding sex for weeks, months or years at a time.

[Johnny Remington @johnsmithy1996]

@_parasocial @RealDianeYap 🤷🤷 auto correct can be a bit of a bitch sometimes. Unlike you who is just a bitch all of the time.

[Johnny Remington @johnsmithy1996]

@SuppressedNws1 Correct. Fucking pedophile cult.

[Johnny Remington @johnsmithy1996]

@Keir_Starmer When the government fails to enact justice, vigilantes will rise up. It’s sucks. It is wrong. But it is foreseeable by a first year polysci student. How tf did you and your cabinet not see this coming?

[Johnny Remington @johnsmithy1996]

@zarahussain999 @Keir_Starmer You should leave. And never come back. Pig.

[Johnny Remington @johnsmithy1996]

1. Idc about condoms. In fact it has always been the woman in my life that didn’t like them during sex.

2. Your dead beat baby daddy is not all men.

3. Your dead beat baby daddy is not all men.

4. Your dead beat baby daddy is not all men.

5. Men genneraly don’t mind women with opinions. But if you say you want equality, and you give a stupid opinion, don’t have a bad reaction when you get called out for it.

6. Yeah participating in and advocating for a disgusting practice that killed off nearly a third of my generation is pretty fucking extreme.

[Johnny Remington @johnsmithy1996]

Because they aren’t? Women are as a gender incapable of maintaining their physical safety against men and historically have been unable to maintain their safety against nature and the elements. That has been the case throughout all of recorded human history.

People like you are only confused by this because men in the western world have built a society so safe; created technology so marvelous that it created the illusion of equality between the sexes.

This illusion was produced and currently maintained by the collective consent of men. The moment men decided women don’t have rights or safety, women no longer have rights or safety. Please see Iranian revolution circa 1979 as a citation. Or half of the world currently.

[Johnny Remington @johnsmithy1996]

@Jassmini2 This was Sarcasm guys. Please don’t worry. I wasn’t being anti gun. Just misogynistic.

[Johnny Remington @johnsmithy1996]

@Jassmini2 You know what, I would love it, if immigrants and women had the same rights as guns in this country.

[Johnny Remington @johnsmithy1996]

@mroentnkr @Jassmini2 Hey bud,

You thought it was being anti gun. Don’t worry I was just being misogynistic and xenophobic. 🤣🤣🤣

[Johnny Remington @johnsmithy1996]

@thatsnotokay22 @MadelaineLucyH If that is what the couple decides to do, it would be logically consistent. Yes. Though I would argue that women are incapable of maintaining their own safety.

[Johnny Remington @johnsmithy1996]

Cool. Can you provide me unbiased scholarly sources that state that this method when used in the proper way with property tracking and consistent periods is only 76% effective?

Furthermore can you provide any scholarly source that when used properly with consistent period tracking, it is the least effective method compared to all other forms of birth control.

There may be this data. There may not. But I can almost guarantee you’re not going to provide it. What you will do is either provide a biased source or simply continue with antidotal examples and ad hominem attacks.

[Johnny Remington @johnsmithy1996]

*first year not first month. Read your biased ai source again. Which being in the first year and not month would indicate that it is an effective means of BC. but like all forms of birth control it needs to be used in the proper manner or it will be less effective.

Can you tell me exactly why your anecdotal experience would be more valid? Is it just your preference that it is so? Or are you simply doing an appeal to authority fallacy because your particular OBGYN’s didn’t recommend it?

[Johnny Remington @johnsmithy1996]

1. Criticizes my anecdotal experience with her own anecdotal experiences. Nice.
2. Puts up an ai generated summery as proof that this method of BC isn’t effective. With a cutoff google search that while you can’t see the whole query, the part that is visible would likely trigger a biased ai summery response.
3. Even with the biased ai summery, it still shows as 76% effective. Which would be in the same ball park as hormonal birth control when not used in the most effective manner.
4. Says I am the exception to the rule when her own stats would show that I am in the 76% of couples who showed it was effective. Last time I checked 76% wouldn’t be the minority position and it certainly wouldn’t make me an exception that proves a rule.

Year you really mogged me with your googling 🙄🙄🙄🙄

[Johnny Remington @johnsmithy1996]

Because I believe n objective morality. And I believe that this objective morality should be derived from Christian Ethics. And in that worldview it is wrong and immoral. 🤷🤷.

A person may or may not be able to decide whether or not they wish to partake in prostitution. That wouldn’t make it any more or less moral.

[Johnny Remington @johnsmithy1996]

@josh_uglyasf Absolutely not!

She needs to pay back every dollar with interest. 🤣🤣

[Johnny Remington @johnsmithy1996]

I will be brutally honest. Because on the skiff chance you aren’t engagement farming and need advice I think it better to do this that to lie.

You have a very pretty face. But your body could be a different story. If you are fat or have a bmi that makes you obese, that could be your problem.

Your face looks put together but if the rest of your hygiene is not together (ie. Lots of body hair, body odor, unhealthy dental hygiene) that can affect attractiveness.

Finally you can have all of these be non issues. But if when you open your mouth all you do is nag, belittle and berate him he will more than likely find you unattractive no matter what you look like. Inner ugliness can infect putter beauty the quickest.